Incidental findings during follow-up scans in oncological patients

Background and aim To assess the prevalence of incidental findings during follow-up scans of patients with oncologic pathology. Methods 499 follow-up scans from different patients with cancer pathology were retrospectively analyzed. Findings which were not suspected by the clinician or known from previous scans were considered as incidental lesions. We excluded lesions that were already suspected by the clinician or were already recorded in the patient’s history before the initial computed tomography (CT) scan. The CT scans were performed on two different machines (“Siemens Somatom Sensation, 64 slices, Erlangen, Germany” and “Siemens Somatom Emotion, 16 slices, Erlangen, Germany”). Most of the patients had a native scan followed by a thoraco-abdominal-pelvic image acquisition after the injection of intravenous contrast media. Results 28% of the patients had unsuspected incidental findings. The prevalence of incidental findings was similar: 56.6% of them were found in men and 43.4% in female patients. In 6 cases (1.2%) the presence of unsuspected pulmonary embolism was discovered. From these cases, 5 (83.3%) had metastatic disease at the moment of the follow-up CT scan and 1 (16.6%) had metastasis-free disease. In 17 patients out of 499 (3.4%) we incidentally made an important discovery which either changed the cancer therapy or required immediate treatment. Conclusion Incidental findings are not rare in oncological patients and the radiologist has to be aware of their presence in order not to overlook them and to correctly diagnose them.

[1]  V. Margulis,et al.  Outcomes of RCC patients with venous thrombus presenting with pulmonary embolism: A multicenter analysis of 782 consecutive patients. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  Seon-Han Kim,et al.  Preoperative chest computerized tomography in patients with locally advanced mid or lower rectal cancer: Its role in staging and impact on treatment strategy , 2010, Journal of surgical oncology.

[3]  M. Gianni,et al.  Prevalence and clinical history of incidental, asymptomatic pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. , 2010, Thrombosis research.

[4]  J. Klaase,et al.  Preoperative Staging with Chest CT in Patients with Colorectal Carcinoma: Not as a Routine Procedure , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[5]  William B Hall,et al.  The prevalence of clinically relevant incidental findings on chest computed tomographic angiograms ordered to diagnose pulmonary embolism. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  William W Mayo-Smith,et al.  The incidental adrenal mass on CT: prevalence of adrenal disease in 1,049 consecutive adrenal masses in patients with no known malignancy. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  J. Coyne,et al.  Should indeterminate lung lesions reported on staging CT scans influence the management of patients with colorectal cancer? , 2007, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[8]  M. Keane,et al.  Prevalence and significance of asymptomatic venous thromboembolic disease found on oncologic staging CT. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  F. Nwariaku,et al.  Adrenal masses in the cancer patient: surveillance or excision. , 2007, The oncologist.

[10]  L. Broemeling,et al.  Incidental pulmonary emboli in oncology patients: prevalence, CT evaluation, and natural history. , 2006, Radiology.

[11]  G. Scagliotti,et al.  Prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma in a contemporary computerized tomography series , 2006, Journal of endocrinological investigation.

[12]  T. McLoud,et al.  CT angiography of pulmonary embolism: diagnostic criteria and causes of misdiagnosis. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[13]  S. Kanazawa,et al.  Intrapulmonary lymph nodes: thin-section CT findings, pathological findings, and CT differential diagnosis from pulmonary metastatic nodules. , 2004, Acta medica Okayama.

[14]  M. Levine,et al.  Venous Thromboembolism and Cancer: Risks and Outcomes , 2003, Circulation.

[15]  M. Korobkin,et al.  Imaging of adrenal incidentalomas: current status. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  Melvyn Korobkin,et al.  Adrenal masses: characterization with combined unenhanced and delayed enhanced CT. , 2002, Radiology.

[17]  B. Grant,et al.  Clinical suspicion of fatal pulmonary embolism. , 2001, Chest.

[18]  J. Olsen,et al.  Prognosis of cancers associated with venous thromboembolism. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  K. Inagaki,et al.  Intrapulmonary satellite nodule of lung cancer as a T factor. , 1998, Chest.

[20]  P. Pellikka,et al.  Clinical recognition of pulmonary embolism: problem of unrecognized and asymptomatic cases. , 1998, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[21]  G D Rubin,et al.  Unsuspected pulmonary embolism: prospective detection on routine helical CT scans. , 1998, Radiology.

[22]  G. Gazelle,et al.  Characterization of adrenal masses using unenhanced CT: an analysis of the CT literature. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  L. Quint,et al.  CT time-attenuation washout curves of adrenal adenomas and nonadenomas. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  T. Byers,et al.  Predilection of lung cancer for the upper lobes: an epidemiologic inquiry. , 1984, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.