Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Shamma. Speech processing in the auditory system. II: Lateral inhibition and the central processing of speech evoked activity in the auditory nerve. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] B C Moore,et al. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] D Byrne,et al. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] Q J Fu,et al. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] Brian R Glasberg,et al. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.
[6] G. Studebaker,et al. Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] Christian Lorenzi,et al. Speech masking release in listeners with flat hearing loss: Effects of masker fluctuation rate on identification scores and phonetic feature reception , 2006, International journal of audiology.
[8] M. Sachs,et al. Representation of steady-state vowels in the temporal aspects of the discharge patterns of populations of auditory-nerve fibers. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] S. Rosen. Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[10] D J Van Tasell,et al. Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] R. Shannon,et al. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] Frédéric Berthommier,et al. Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise , 2006, Hearing Research.
[13] R. Plomp,et al. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] B. Moore,et al. Effect of the speed of a single-channel dynamic range compressor on intelligibility in a competing speech task. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] Brian C J Moore,et al. Prediction of absolute thresholds and equal-loudness contours using a modified loudness model. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] A. Macleod,et al. A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use. , 1990, British journal of audiology.
[18] I. Pollack,et al. Effects of Differentiation, Integration, and Infinite Peak Clipping upon the Intelligibility of Speech , 1948 .
[19] Mary T Cord,et al. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[20] Laurent Demany,et al. Consequences of cochlear damage for the detection of interaural phase differences. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] Mischa Schwartz,et al. Information transmission, modulation, and noise , 1959 .
[22] B. Moore. An introduction to the psychology of hearing, 3rd ed. , 1989 .
[23] Harvey b. Fletcher,et al. Speech and hearing in communication , 1953 .
[24] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] M F Dorman,et al. The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6-20 channels. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] Thomas Baer,et al. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing‐impaired and normally hearing people , 1997 .
[27] Zachary M. Smith,et al. Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception , 2002, Nature.
[28] Brian C J Moore,et al. Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[29] B C Moore,et al. Development and evaluation of a procedure for fitting multi-channel compression hearing aids. , 1998, British journal of audiology.
[30] Michael K. Qin,et al. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] G E Loeb,et al. Spatial cross-correlation , 1983, Biological Cybernetics.
[32] N. Kiang,et al. Acoustic trauma in cats. Cochlear pathology and auditory-nerve activity. , 1978, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.
[33] L. Demany,et al. Modulation detection by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1998, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[34] John Bamford,et al. Speech-hearing tests and the spoken language of hearing-impaired children , 1979 .
[35] R Plomp,et al. The effect of a hearing aid on the speech-reception threshold of hearing-impaired listeners in quiet and in noise. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[36] B. Moore,et al. Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech. , 1989, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.
[37] S P Bacon,et al. Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[38] Brian C J Moore,et al. Moderate cochlear hearing loss leads to a reduced ability to use temporal fine structure information. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[39] C W Turner,et al. Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[40] B C Moore,et al. Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speech. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[41] Brian C. J. Moore,et al. Discrimination of the fundamental frequency of complex tones with fixed and shifting spectral envelopes by normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects , 2003, Hearing Research.
[42] Matthew H. Davis,et al. Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[43] B. Moore,et al. A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss , 2004, Hearing Research.
[44] B C Moore,et al. Detection of frequency modulation at low modulation rates: evidence for a mechanism based on phase locking. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[45] O Ghitza,et al. On the upper cutoff frequency of the auditory critical-band envelope detectors in the context of speech perception. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[46] Christian Lorenzi,et al. The ability of listeners to use recovered envelope cues from speech fine structure. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[47] S. Bacon,et al. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[48] Brian C J Moore,et al. Side effects of fast-acting dynamic range compression that affect intelligibility in a competing speech task. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[49] M. Dorman,et al. Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[50] B. Moore. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1977 .
[51] S. G. Nooteboom,et al. Intonation and the perceptual separation of simultaneous voices , 1982 .
[52] M W Skinner,et al. Amplification bandwidth and intelligibility of speech in quiet and noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1983, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[53] Brian C. J. Moore,et al. Frequency discrimination of complex tones by hearing-impaired subjects: Evidence for loss of ability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Hearing Research.
[54] R V Shannon,et al. Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.
[55] R. Bracewell. The Fourier Transform and Its Applications , 1966 .
[56] Richard L Freyman,et al. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[57] M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller,et al. Cognitive aging and auditory information processing , 2003, International journal of audiology.
[58] B. Moore,et al. Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency, measured in several ways. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[59] Deniz Başkent,et al. Speech recognition in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss as a function of the number of spectral channels. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[60] Brian C J Moore,et al. New Version of the TEN Test With Calibrations in dB HL , 2004, Ear and hearing.
[61] Brian C J Moore,et al. Detection of frequency modulation by hearing-impaired listeners: effects of carrier frequency, modulation rate, and added amplitude modulation. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[62] Emily Buss,et al. Temporal Fine-Structure Cues to Speech and Pure Tone Modulation in Observers with Sensorineural Hearing Loss , 2004, Ear and hearing.
[63] B. Moore,et al. Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[64] M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller,et al. Effect of age on detection of gaps in speech and nonspeech markers varying in duration and spectral symmetry. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[65] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[66] E. D. Boer. Pitch of Inharmonic Signals , 1956, Nature.
[67] J M Festen,et al. Relations between auditory functions in impaired hearing. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[68] Q. Summerfield,et al. Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with different fundamental frequencies. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[69] T. Houtgast,et al. Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[70] A. Palmer,et al. Phase-locking in the cochlear nerve of the guinea-pig and its relation to the receptor potential of inner hair-cells , 1986, Hearing Research.
[71] C. Turner,et al. High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[72] A. Ryan,et al. Neural phase-locking properties in the absence of cochlear outer hair cells , 1981, Hearing Research.