Task reward structure shapes rapid receptive field plasticity in auditory cortex

As sensory stimuli and behavioral demands change, the attentive brain quickly identifies task-relevant stimuli and associates them with appropriate motor responses. The effects of attention on sensory processing vary across task paradigms, suggesting that the brain may use multiple strategies and mechanisms to highlight attended stimuli and link them to motor action. To better understand factors that contribute to these variable effects, we studied sensory representations in primary auditory cortex (A1) during two instrumental tasks that shared the same auditory discrimination but required different behavioral responses, either approach or avoidance. In the approach task, ferrets were rewarded for licking a spout when they heard a target tone amid a sequence of reference noise sounds. In the avoidance task, they were punished unless they inhibited licking to the target. To explore how these changes in task reward structure influenced attention-driven rapid plasticity in A1, we measured changes in sensory neural responses during behavior. Responses to the target changed selectively during both tasks but did so with opposite sign. Despite the differences in sign, both effects were consistent with a general neural coding strategy that maximizes discriminability between sound classes. The dependence of the direction of plasticity on task suggests that representations in A1 change not only to sharpen representations of task-relevant stimuli but also to amplify responses to stimuli that signal aversive outcomes and lead to behavioral inhibition. Thus, top-down control of sensory processing can be shaped by task reward structure in addition to the required sensory discrimination.

[1]  J. Fritz,et al.  Differential Dynamic Plasticity of A1 Receptive Fields during Multiple Spectral Tasks , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  D H HUBEL,et al.  "Attention" Units in the Auditory Cortex , 1959, Science.

[3]  Norman M. Weinberger,et al.  Learning strategy trumps motivational level in determining learning-induced auditory cortical plasticity , 2010, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[4]  Norman M Weinberger,et al.  Encoding of learned importance of sound by magnitude of representational area in primary auditory cortex. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Katherine M. Armstrong,et al.  Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortex , 2003, Nature.

[6]  M. Kilgard,et al.  Cortical activity patterns predict speech discrimination ability , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  W. Schultz,et al.  Preferential activation of midbrain dopamine neurons by appetitive rather than aversive stimuli , 1996, Nature.

[8]  André Brechmann,et al.  The cognitive auditory cortex: Task-specificity of stimulus representations , 2007, Hearing Research.

[9]  Gonzalo H. Otazu,et al.  Engaging in an auditory task suppresses responses in auditory cortex , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Cortical remodelling induced by activity of ventral tegmental dopamine neurons , 2001, Nature.

[11]  S. David,et al.  Adaptive, behaviorally-gated, persistent encoding of task-relevant auditory information in ferret frontal cortex , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  M. Kilgard,et al.  Cortical map reorganization enabled by nucleus basalis activity. , 1998, Science.

[13]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Representation of negative motivational value in the primate lateral habenula , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  James L Olds,et al.  Differential development of conditioned unit changes in thalamus and cortex of rat. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Nima Mesgarani,et al.  A computational model of rapid task-related plasticity of auditory cortical receptive fields , 2010, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[16]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Experience-Dependent Adult Cortical Plasticity Requires Cognitive Association between Sensation and Reward , 2006, Neuron.

[17]  C. Schreiner,et al.  A synaptic memory trace for cortical receptive field plasticity , 2007, Nature.

[18]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Attention improves performance primarily by reducing interneuronal correlations , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Mounya Elhilali,et al.  Monkey Frequency-Modulation Encoding in the Primary Auditory Cortex of the Awake Owl , 2001 .

[20]  Michael M Merzenich,et al.  Perceptual Learning Directs Auditory Cortical Map Reorganization through Top-Down Influences , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Mounya Elhilali,et al.  Task Difficulty and Performance Induce Diverse Adaptive Patterns in Gain and Shape of Primary Auditory Cortical Receptive Fields , 2009, Neuron.

[22]  M. Nicolelis,et al.  Neuronal Ensemble Bursting in the Basal Forebrain Encodes Salience Irrespective of Valence , 2008, Neuron.

[23]  H. Scheich,et al.  Nonauditory Events of a Behavioral Procedure Activate Auditory Cortex of Highly Trained Monkeys , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  E. Knudsen Fundamental components of attention. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  D. Diamond,et al.  Physiological plasticity in auditory cortex: Rapid induction by learning , 1987, Progress in Neurobiology.

[26]  E. Fehr,et al.  Resisting the Power of Temptations , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Jonathan Z. Simon,et al.  Robust Spectrotemporal Reverse Correlation for the Auditory System: Optimizing Stimulus Design , 2000, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[28]  M. H. Goldstein,et al.  Evoked unit activity in auditory cortex of monkeys performing a selective attention task , 1976, Brain Research.

[29]  K. Pribram,et al.  Effects on delayed-response performance of lesions of dorsolateral and ventromedial frontal cortex of baboons. , 1952, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[30]  Harvey A Swadlow,et al.  Task difficulty modulates the activity of specific neuronal populations in primary visual cortex , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  J. Edeline,et al.  Rapid development of learning-induced receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex. , 1993, Behavioral neuroscience.

[32]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[33]  J. Gallant,et al.  Attention to Stimulus Features Shifts Spectral Tuning of V4 Neurons during Natural Vision , 2008, Neuron.

[34]  S. David,et al.  Does attention play a role in dynamic receptive field adaptation to changing acoustic salience in A1? , 2007, Hearing Research.

[35]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[36]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  An Integrated Microcircuit Model of Attentional Processing in the Neocortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  D. Margoliash,et al.  Neuronal populations and single cells representing learned auditory objects , 2003, Nature.

[38]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Perceptual learning and top-down influences in primary visual cortex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  H. Scheich,et al.  The combination of appetitive and aversive reinforcers and the nature of their interaction during auditory learning , 2010, Neuroscience.

[40]  Robert C. Liu,et al.  Dissecting natural sensory plasticity: Hormones and experience in a maternal context , 2009, Hearing Research.

[41]  W. Freeman,et al.  Change in pattern of ongoing cortical activity with auditory category learning , 2001, Nature.

[42]  Georg M. Klump,et al.  Methods in Comparative Psychoacoustics , 1995, BioMethods.

[43]  J. Bakin,et al.  Induction of a physiological memory in the cerebral cortex by stimulation of the nucleus basalis. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  E. Niebur,et al.  Modeling the Temporal Dynamics of IT Neurons in Visual Search: A Mechanism for Top-Down Selective Attention , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  E. Rolls,et al.  A Neurodynamical cortical model of visual attention and invariant object recognition , 2004, Vision Research.

[46]  John C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Auditory Cortex Spatial Sensitivity Sharpens During Task Performance , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Plasticity of human auditory-evoked fields induced by shock conditioning and contingency reversal , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  J. Fritz,et al.  Rapid task-related plasticity of spectrotemporal receptive fields in primary auditory cortex , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[49]  J. Fritz,et al.  Adaptive changes in cortical receptive fields induced by attention to complex sounds. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.