Doctrinal and applied TQM in relation to dominant models of organisation: A comparative study

Total Quality Management (TQM) is examined in five organisations in light of the assumption that its implementation is an ongoing negotiated order rather than an objective reality as often accepted by the literature. Guided by a theoretical framework identified by Spencer (1994) and a qualitative methodology suggested by Miles and Huberman (1994), the perceptions of a cross section of organisational members in five organisations are used to establish the nature of applied TQM in terms of mechanistic and organismic 'mental models' of organisation and the degree to which applied TQM varies from the basic doctrine. It is argued that both .models influence the way in which TQM is applied in organisations, and the research aims to identify the strength and direction of the influence exerted towards a more mechanistic or a more organismic implementation. Further, this research is intended to make a positive contribution to the presently limited amount of empirical evidence on the implementation of TQM upon which theory building in the literature is based. The results of the research indicate that TQM in three of the organisations studied is being implemented in generally organismic ways although in two organisations, strong influences by the mechanistic model were detected. Further, major differences between the basic doctrine of TQM, as identified in the literature, and the practical experience of TQM as applied in organisations were identified. These differences relate to organisational goal orientation, conceptions of quality and, to a lesser extent, the direction and pattern of organisational communication. Several possible explanations for these results are put forward, especially in the light of themes emerging from the evidence collected, although this exploratory research does not attempt to develop theory or propose explanatory relationships between possible variables. It is argued that these results have significant implications, and recommendations for further research on a number of key themes indicated by this research are made. In particular, longitudinal research using the same or similar organisations is called for, as the application ofTQM is an ongoing process and its full evolutionary nature can only be captured over time.

[1]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations , 1983 .

[2]  L. Smircich Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[3]  Kathleen L. Gregory,et al.  Native-view paradigms: Multiple cultures and culture conflicts in organizations. , 1983 .

[4]  Adrian John Wilkinson,et al.  TQM and the Management of Labour , 2013 .

[5]  P. Strong,et al.  The case for qualitative research , 1992 .

[6]  Stephen P. Robbins,et al.  Organisational behaviour : concepts, controversies and applications : Australia and New Zealand , 1994 .

[7]  A. Sinclair The Tyranny of a Team Ideology , 1992 .

[8]  H L Michael,et al.  MANAGEMENT OF RESEARCH. INTRODUCTION , 1973 .

[9]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[10]  Paul D. Larson,et al.  The TQM Impact: A Study of Quality Managers' Perceptions , 1995 .

[11]  David A. Waldman,et al.  THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT TO A THEORY OF WORK PERFORMANCE , 1994 .

[12]  Monder Ram,et al.  Implementing quality in a small firm: An action research approach , 1998 .

[13]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Science, Specific Knowledge and Total Quality Management , 1994 .

[14]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[15]  M. Engle Book Review: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd Ed.) , 1999 .

[16]  David A. Garvin,et al.  Quality Problems, Policies and Attitudes in the U.S. and Japan: An Exploratory Study , 1986 .

[17]  Karen A. Golden THE INDIVIDUAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: STRATEGIES FOR ACTION IN HIGHLY‐ORDERED CONTEXTS* , 1992 .

[18]  J. Barker Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams , 1993 .

[19]  Patrick Dawson,et al.  The rhetoric and bureaucracy of quality management , 1998 .

[20]  Richard N. Osborn,et al.  Contrasts in enacting TQM: Mechanistic vs. organic ideology and implementation , 1997 .

[21]  Barry J. Witcher,et al.  The Changing Scale of Total Quality Management , 1995 .

[22]  J. Dean,et al.  MANAGEMENT THEORY AND TOTAL QUALITY: IMPROVING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE THROUGH THEORY DEVELOPMENT , 1994 .

[23]  L. Yorks,et al.  Beyond Total Quality Management: Toward The Emerging Paradigm , 1994 .

[24]  Jayant V. Saraph,et al.  An Instrument for Measuring the Critical Factors of Quality Management , 1989 .

[25]  C. Argyris Empowerment: the emperor's new clothes. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[26]  R. Schroeder,et al.  A THEORY OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT UNDERLYING THE DEMING MANAGEMENT METHOD , 1994 .

[27]  Mark J. Zbaracki The Rhetoric and Reality of Total Quality Management , 1998 .

[28]  T. C. Powell Total Quality Management as Competitive Advantage , 1995 .

[29]  S. Sitkin,et al.  DISTINGUISHING CONTROL FROM LEARNING IN TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT: A CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVE , 1994 .

[30]  David J. Lemak,et al.  Beyond Process: TQM Content and Firm Performance , 1996 .

[31]  R. Ray Gehani,et al.  Quality value-chain: a meta-synthesis of frontiers of quality movement , 1993 .

[32]  Patrick E. Connor Total Quality Management: A Selective Commentary on Its Human Dimensions, with Special Reference to Its Downside. , 1997 .

[33]  G. Morgan Paradigms, Metaphors, and Puzzle Solving in Organizational Theory. , 1980 .

[34]  W. J. Miller,et al.  A working definition for total quality management (TQM) researchers , 1996 .

[35]  Carol Reeves,et al.  DEFINING QUALITY: ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS , 1994 .

[36]  R. Evered,et al.  Alternative Perspectives in the Organizational Sciences: “Inquiry from the Inside” and “Inquiry from the Outside” , 1981 .

[37]  J Bowe,et al.  Total quality management. , 1992, Contemporary longterm care.