Flexibility of attention between stimulus dimensions

Three experiments examined the flexibility of attention to the color and location dimensions of visual stimuli. Displays typically consisted of two curved lines, one a target and the other a distractor. Subjects were precued to the location of the target, and they made a speeded response to that item’s direction of curvature. In Experiment 1, a color difference between the stimuli facilitated selective attention to targets. Experiment 2 demonstrated that this effect was not automatic. Although component color differences were necessary for selective attention, they were not sufficient unless they reliably specified the target. Furthermore, when color was informative but the target was in an unexpected color, performance was markedly impaired. A third experiment, using a response-deadline technique, showed that stimulus color was resolved before stimulus location and that attention can be exclusive to the color dimension. The results were interpreted in terms of a model assuming that stimulus color and location are processed independently. Subjects attend to the dimension resolved most quickly which can reliably specify the target.

[1]  G. Lockhead Effects of dimensional redundancy on visual discrimination. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  L. G. Williams,et al.  The effect of target specification on objects fixated during visual search , 1966 .

[3]  R. Pew,et al.  Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in Reaction Time: Effect of Discrete Criterion Times , 1968 .

[4]  Peter Shaw,et al.  Processing of tachistoscopic displays with controlled order of characters and spaces , 1969 .

[5]  S. E. Clark,et al.  Retrieval of color information from preperceptual memory. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  H. Hawkins Parallel processing in complex visual discrimination , 1969 .

[7]  D. Bamber Reaction times and error rates for “same”-“different” judgments of multidimensional stimull , 1969 .

[8]  W. R. Garner,et al.  The Stimulus in Information Processing , 1970 .

[9]  I. Biederman,et al.  Processing redundant information , 1970 .

[10]  G. Lockhead Identification and the form of multidimensional discrimination space. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing , 1970 .

[12]  D. Alanallport Parallel encoding within and between elementary stimulus dimensions , 1971 .

[13]  Donald Bamber,et al.  Reaction times and error rates for judging nominal identity of letter strings , 1972 .

[14]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Some characteristics of selective attention in visual perception determined by vocal reaction time , 1972 .

[15]  G. Lockhead Processing dimensional stimuli: a note. , 1972, Psychological review.

[16]  James R. Pomerantz,et al.  Stimules configuration in selective attention tasks , 1973 .

[17]  Charles W. Eriksen,et al.  The effect of flanking letters and digits on speed of identifying a letter , 1973 .

[18]  Charles Curtis Eriksen,et al.  The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays , 1973 .

[19]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Selective encoding from multielement visual displays , 1973 .

[20]  P H Seymour,et al.  Stroop interference with response, comparison, and encoding stages in a sentence-picture comparison task , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[21]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[22]  W. R. Garner The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[23]  Facilitation of Letter Recognition by an Annulus in a Metacontrast Paradigm , 1974 .

[24]  J. R. Pomerantz,et al.  Grouping by proximity: Selective attention measures , 1975 .

[25]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[26]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Interaction of stimulus dimensions in concept and choice processes , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  M. Chen,et al.  Abstraction of Information from a Complex Display , 1977, Perception.

[29]  G R Lockhead,et al.  Classifying intergral stimuli. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  E. Geller Latencies to name one of three stimulus dimensions: A study of probability effects and dimension integrality , 1977 .

[31]  R. Nickerson Comment on W. R. Garner's "Selective attention to attributes and to stimuli." , 1978 .

[32]  J R Dykes,et al.  An investigation of the perceptual basis of redundancy gain and orthogonal interference for integral dimensions , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Levels of experienced dimensionality in children and adults , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  Charles W. Eriksen,et al.  Target redundancy in visual search: Do repetitions of the target within thedisplay impair processing? , 1979 .

[35]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  J R Dykes,et al.  A demonstration of selection of analyzers for integral dimensions. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  John Duncan,et al.  The demonstration of capacity limitation , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[38]  G. Humphreys On Varying the Span of Visual Attention: Evidence for Two Modes of Spatial Attention , 1981 .