Relationship between calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and hip dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in young healthy men

[1]  Mau-Roung Lin,et al.  Use of Quantitative Ultrasound for Identifying Low Bone Density in Older People , 2010, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[2]  I. Bosaeus,et al.  High correlation between quantitative ultrasound and DXA during 7 years of follow-up. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[3]  Tae-Seong Kim,et al.  Finite element simulation of ultrasound propagation in bone for quantitative ultrasound toward the diagnosis of osteoporosis , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  R. Luben,et al.  The effect of including quantitative heel ultrasound in models for estimation of 10-year absolute risk of fracture. , 2009, Bone.

[5]  R. Luben,et al.  Is QUS or DXA Better for Predicting the 10‐Year Absolute Risk of Fracture? , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[6]  T. Link,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of skeletal status , 2009, European Radiology.

[7]  J. Eisman,et al.  Mortality risk associated with low-trauma osteoporotic fracture and subsequent fracture in men and women. , 2009, JAMA.

[8]  A. Díez-Pérez,et al.  Relationship between bone quantitative ultrasound and mortality: a prospective study , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[9]  D. Hans,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound for the detection and management of osteoporosis. , 2009, Salud publica de Mexico.

[10]  C. Roux,et al.  DXA scanning in clinical practice. , 2008, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[11]  M. Fini,et al.  Influence of density, elasticity, and structure on ultrasound transmission through trabecular bone cylinders , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  Jacques Cornuz,et al.  Osteoporotic fracture risk in elderly women: estimation with quantitative heel US and clinical risk factors. , 2008, Radiology.

[13]  F. Padilla,et al.  A device for in vivo measurements of quantitative ultrasound variables at the human proximal femur , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[14]  M. Bianchi.  Osteoporosis in children and adolescents. , 2007, Bone.

[15]  D. Mitton,et al.  Eulerstrut.cavity, a New Histomorphometric Parameter of Connectivity Reflects Bone Strength and Speed of Sound in Trabecular Bone from Human Os Calcis , 2007, Calcified Tissue International.

[16]  A. Gemalmaz,et al.  Identifying osteoporosis in a primary care setting with quantitative ultrasound: relationship to anthropometric and lifestyle factors , 2007, Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism.

[17]  D. C. Bauer,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound predicts hip and non-spine fracture in men: the MrOS study , 2007, Osteoporosis International.

[18]  M. Välimäki,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound variables of the heel in Finnish men aged 18–20 yr: predictors, relationship to bone mineral content, and changes during military service , 2006, Osteoporosis International.

[19]  E. McAuley,et al.  Ultrasound of the calcaneus and bone mineral density differs in older black and white women but is not impacted by current physical activity , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[20]  S. Rossi,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the prediction of fragility fracture in men , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[21]  L. Melton,et al.  Contributions of bone density and structure to fracture risk assessment in men and women , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[22]  P. Sambrook,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound measurements of bone: measurement error, discordance, and their effects on longitudinal studies , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[23]  K. Khaw,et al.  Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) of the heel bone and its correlates in men and women in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort: a cross-sectional population-based study , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[24]  X. Marchandise,et al.  Does Quantitative Ultrasound of Bone Reflect More Bone Mineral Density Than Bone Microarchitecture? , 2003, Calcified Tissue International.

[25]  R. Rizzoli,et al.  Bone strength and its determinants , 2003, Osteoporosis International.

[26]  L. Bachrach,et al.  Comparison of calcaneus ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry in children at risk of osteopenia. , 2003, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[27]  L. J. C. E. Brukx,et al.  Evaluation of the usefulness of a quantitative ultrasound device in screening of bone mineral density in children , 2003, Annals of human biology.

[28]  S. Bass,et al.  The evidence that exercise during growth or adulthood reduces the risk of fragility fractures is weak. , 2001, Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology.

[29]  A. Zwinderman,et al.  Comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in pre- and postmenopausal women. , 2001, The Netherlands journal of medicine.

[30]  T J Beck,et al.  Stress fracture in military recruits: gender differences in muscle and bone susceptibility factors. , 2000, Bone.

[31]  C. Njeh,et al.  Use of quantitative ultrasound to assess bone status in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a pilot study. , 2000, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[32]  T. Spector,et al.  The Effects of 10 Weeks Military Training on Heel Ultrasound and Bone Turnover , 1999, Calcified Tissue International.

[33]  R. Speller,et al.  Comparison of ultrasound and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in the calcaneus. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[34]  C C Glüer,et al.  Bone densitometry: current status and future prospects. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[35]  C. Langton,et al.  Male and female normative data for ultrasound measurement of the calcaneus within the UK adult population. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[36]  Harry K. Genant,et al.  Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women. A prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. , 1997, Archives of internal medicine.

[37]  G Berger,et al.  In vitro assessment of the relationship between acoustic properties and bone mass density of the calcaneus by comparison of ultrasound parametric imaging and quantitative computed tomography. , 1997, Bone.

[38]  P. Sparling,et al.  Comparison of body composition and bone mineral measurements from two DXA instruments in young men. , 1996, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[39]  O. Johnell,et al.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures , 1996 .

[40]  G W Petley,et al.  Broadband ultrasonic attenuation: are current measurement techniques inherently inaccurate? , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[41]  J. Casez,et al.  Bone mass at lumbar spine and tibia in young males--impact of physical fitness, exercise, and anthropometric parameters: a prospective study in a cohort of military recruits. , 1995, Bone.

[42]  D. Hans,et al.  Ultrasound measurements on the os calcis in a prospective multicenter study , 1994, Calcified Tissue International.

[43]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Three quantitative ultrasound parameters reflect bone structure , 1994, Calcified Tissue International.

[44]  Thomas A. Einhorn,et al.  Perspectives: Ultrasound assessment of bone , 1993 .

[45]  R. Rizzoli,et al.  Longitudinal monitoring of bone mass accumulation in healthy adolescents: evidence for a marked reduction after 16 years of age at the levels of lumbar spine and femoral neck in female subjects. , 1992, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[46]  M. P. Hayball,et al.  Comparative performance in vitro and in vivo of Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray absorptiometers. , 1991, The British journal of radiology.

[47]  J. Aaron,et al.  The microanatomy of trabecular bone loss in normal aging men and women. , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[48]  M. Kleerekoper,et al.  Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. , 1983, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[49]  G. Blake,et al.  Role of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. , 2007, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[50]  P. Laugier,et al.  Assessment of the relationship between broadband ultrasound attenuation and bone mineral density at the calcaneus using BUA imaging and DXA , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[51]  C. M. Langton,et al.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: A review , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[52]  C. Christiansen,et al.  Measurements of bone mineral density of the proximal femur by two commercially available dual energy X-ray absorptiometric systems , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[53]  C. Hassager,et al.  How does quantitative ultrasound compare to dual X-ray absorptiometry at various skeletal sites in relation to the WHO diagnosis categories? , 2001, Clinical physiology.

[54]  O Johnell,et al.  Age, gender, and fragility fractures are associated with differences in quantitative ultrasound independent of bone mineral density. , 2001, Bone.

[55]  H. K. Genant,et al.  Comparison of Six Calcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound Devices: Precision and Hip Fracture Discrimination , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[56]  C. Langton,et al.  Comparison of bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: site-matched correlation and discrimination of axial BMD status. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[57]  A. Tenenhouse,et al.  Estimation of the Prevalence of Low Bone Density in Canadian Women and Men Using a Population-Specific DXA Reference Standard: The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[58]  J. Kanis,et al.  An Update on the Diagnosis and Assessment of Osteoporosis with Densitometry , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[59]  J. Smit,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound Measurements of the Tibia and Calcaneus in Comparison with DXA Measurements at Various Skeletal Sites , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[60]  L. Jørgensen,et al.  The role of quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of bone: a review. , 1998, Clinical physiology.

[61]  J. Cunningham,et al.  Ultrasound velocity and attenuation at different skeletal sites compared with bone mineral density measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.

[62]  M A Laskey,et al.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition. , 1996, Nutrition.

[63]  J. A. Evans,et al.  The effect of bone structure on ultrasonic attenuation and velocity. , 1992, Ultrasonics.