Towards Improving Enterprise Architecture Decision-Making through Service-Dominant Logic

Enterprise architecting is a complex process that includes incorporating knowledge, processes, systems, technologies, and people. In order to ensure the appropriate value integration in this complex process, key fundamentals for value integration need to be explored and studied in this context. Previous research has shown that architecture management and business strategy are still largely disintegrated and misaligned on many levels. Hence, this paper aims to describe the role of service science, specifically the service-dominant (S-D) logic, within the overall enterprise architecture (EA) environment as a potential perspective that will allow alignment and integration. The paper uses the architectural decision-making scenario to illustrate the gaps for contribution, and to argue that service science has the key ingredients that should be used to facilitate value integration in enterprise architecture environment. Architectural decision-makers including enterprise architects and business managers can ultimately benefit from using service science as a strategic logic to better integrate values in their decision-making process.

[1]  Jeff Tyree,et al.  Architecture decisions: demystifying architecture , 2005, IEEE Software.

[2]  H. Shah,et al.  Frameworks for Enterprise Architecture , 2007, IT Professional.

[3]  Farhad Arbab,et al.  Enterprise architecture: Management tool and blueprint for the organisation , 2006, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[4]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Toward a conceptual foundation for service science: Contributions from service-dominant logic , 2008, IBM Syst. J..

[5]  Hausi A. Müller,et al.  Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering & Knowledge Engineering (SEKE'2011), Eden Roc Renaissance, Miami Beach, USA, July 7-9, 2011 , 2001, SEKE.

[6]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[7]  Frank Leymann,et al.  The Role of Architectural Decisions in Model-Driven SOA Construction , 2006 .

[8]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Service systems, service scientists, SSME, and innovation , 2006, CACM.

[9]  Stephen H. Kaisler,et al.  Enterprise Architecting: Critical Problems , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[10]  Mark Klein,et al.  Quantifying the costs and benefits of architectural decisions , 2001, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2001.

[11]  Jaap Schekkerman,et al.  How to Survive in the Jungle of Enterprise Architecture Framework: Creating or Choosing an Enterprise Architecture Framework , 2003 .

[12]  Simon Liu,et al.  Getting the most from your enterprise architecture , 2000 .

[13]  Soe-Tsyr Yuan,et al.  A S-D Logic Based Approach to Input-Output Analysis for Technology Spillover , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  John A. Zachman,et al.  Enterprise Architecture: The Issue of the Century , 2001 .

[15]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution , 2006 .

[16]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Steps Toward a Science of Service Systems , 2007, Computer.

[17]  Michael Grüninger,et al.  Introduction , 2002, CACM.

[18]  F. LuschR.,et al.  Toward a conceptual foundation for service science , 2008 .

[19]  Johan van Loggerenberg,et al.  Challenges Facing Enterprise Architects: A South African Perspective , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[20]  A. J. Van Rensburg,et al.  ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE - NEW BUSINESS VALUE PERSPECTIVES , 2012 .

[21]  F. J. Armour,et al.  A big-picture look at enterprise architectures , 1999 .

[22]  Hans van Vliet,et al.  Stakeholder Perception of Enterprise Architecture , 2008, ECSA.

[23]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Coordination in Enterprise Architecting: An Interview Study , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[24]  James C. Spohrer,et al.  Service Science , 2007, Journal of Grid Computing.