Elaborated Reichardt correlators for velocity estimation tasks

The study of insect vision is believed to provide a key solution to many different aspects of motion detection and velocity estimation. The main reason for this is that motion detection in the fly is extremely fast, with computations requiring only a few milliseconds. So the insect visual system serves as the basis for many models of motion detection. The earliest and the most prominent model is the Reichardt correlator model. But it is found that in the absence of additional system components, the response of a simple Reichardt correlator model is dependent on contrast and spatial frequency. Dror has demonstrated in his work that the addition of spatial and temporal filtering, saturation, integration and adaptation in a correlator based system can make it act as a reliable velocity estimator. In this paper, we try to further investigate and expand his model to improve the correlator performance. Our recent neurobiological experiments suggest that adaptive mechanisms decrease EMD (elementary motion detector) dependence on pattern contrast and improve reliability. So appropriate modelling of an adaptive feedback mechanism is done to normalise contrast of input signals.

[1]  A. Borst,et al.  Transient and steady-state response properties of movement detectors. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[2]  C W Clifford,et al.  Adaptation to visual motion in directional neurons of the nucleus of the optic tract. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  R. R. Ruyter van Steveninck,et al.  Adaptation of transient responses of a movement-sensitive neuron in the visual system of the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala , 1986, Biological Cybernetics.

[4]  D. Ruderman The statistics of natural images , 1994 .

[5]  C M Higgins Sensory Architectures for Biologically Inspired Autonomous Robotics , 2001, The Biological Bulletin.

[6]  Allan W. Snyder,et al.  Spatial information capacity of compound eyes , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[7]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Determining Optical Flow , 1981, Other Conferences.

[8]  H. Barlow,et al.  Evidence for a Physiological Explanation of the Waterfall Phenomenon and Figural After-effects , 1963, Nature.

[9]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Computational structure of a biological motion-detection system as revealed by local detector analysis in the fly's nervous system. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  T. Collett,et al.  Chasing behaviour of houseflies (Fannia canicularis) , 1974, Journal of comparative physiology.

[11]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Course Control in Insects , 1989 .

[12]  C.W.G. CLIFFORD,et al.  A Model of Temporal Adaptation in Fly Motion Vision , 1996, Vision Research.

[13]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Adaptation of the motion-sensitive neuron H1 is generated locally and governed by contrast frequency , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[14]  R. B. Pinter Adaptation of receptive field spatial organization via multiplicative lateral inhibition. , 1984, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  Robert A. Harris,et al.  Contrast Gain Reduction in Fly Motion Adaptation , 2000, Neuron.

[16]  Ron O. Dror,et al.  Accuracy of Visual Velocity Estimation by Reichardt Correlators , 1998 .

[17]  N. Strausfeld,et al.  Visual motion detection circuits in flies: peripheral motion computation by identified small-field retinotopic neurons , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  Vasilis Z. Marmarelis,et al.  An artificial neural network for motion detection and speed estimation , 1990, 1990 IJCNN International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[19]  Floyd Ratliff,et al.  Studies on Excitation and Inhibition in the Retina , 1975 .

[20]  G. J. Burton,et al.  Color and spatial structure in natural scenes. , 1987, Applied optics.

[21]  S. McKee,et al.  Precise velocity discrimination despite random variations in temporal frequency and contrast , 1986, Vision Research.

[22]  A. Borst,et al.  Dendritic integration and its role in computing image velocity. , 1998, Science.

[23]  Zhang,et al.  Honeybee navigation en route to the goal: visual flight control and odometry , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[24]  Robert A. Harris,et al.  Adaptation and the temporal delay filter of fly motion detectors , 1999, Vision Research.

[25]  K. Kirschfeld The visual system of Musca: Studies on optics, structure and function , 1972 .

[26]  Patrick A. Shoemaker,et al.  Implementation of visual motion detection with contrast adaptation , 2001, SPIE Micro + Nano Materials, Devices, and Applications.

[27]  M. Egelhaaf,et al.  Temporal modulation of luminance adapts time constant of fly movement detectors , 1987, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[29]  S. Laughlin Matching coding, circuits, cells, and molecules to signals: General principles of retinal design in the fly's eye , 1994, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[30]  R O Dror,et al.  Accuracy of velocity estimation by Reichardt correlators. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[31]  J. Howard,et al.  Response of an insect photoreceptor: a simple log-normal model , 1981, Nature.

[32]  W Reichardt,et al.  Functional structure of a mechanism of perception of optical movement , 1958 .

[33]  E. Buchner Elementary movement detectors in an insect visual system , 1976, Biological Cybernetics.

[34]  Andrew Charles James,et al.  White-noise studies in the fly lamina , 1990 .

[35]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Amplitude spectra of natural images. , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.