Is There Life After Policy Streams, Advocacy Coalitions, and Punctuations: Using Evolutionary Theory to Explain Policy Change?

This article reviews the current state of public policy theory to find out if researchers are ready to readdress the research agenda set by the classic works of Baumgartner and Jones (1993), Kingdon (1984) and Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith (1993). After reviewing the influences of institutional, rational choice, network, socio-economic and ideational approaches, the article pays tribute to the policy streams, punctuated equilibrium and policy advocacy coalition frameworks whilst also suggesting that future theory and research could identify more precisely the causal mechanisms driving policy change. The article argues that evolutionary theory may usefully uncover the micro-level processes at work, particularly as some the three frameworks refer to dymamic models and methods. After reviewing some evolutionary game theory and the study of memes, the article suggests that the benefits of evolutionary theory in extending policy theories need to be balanced by its limitations.

[1]  J. Lane,et al.  The New Institutional Politics: Performance and outcomes , 2000 .

[2]  P. John.  The Uses and Abuses of Evolutionary Theory in Political Science: A Reply to Allan McConnell and Keith Dowding , 2000 .

[3]  K. B. D. Greene.  The Challenge to Policymaking of Large-Scale Systems , 1994 .

[4]  Kj Love,et al.  A political analysis , 2003 .

[5]  Andrew Farkas,et al.  Evolutionary Models in Foreign Policy Analysis , 1996 .

[6]  D. Marsh,et al.  There is More Than One Way to Do Political Science: On Different Ways to Study Policy Networks , 2001 .

[7]  Wolfgang C. Müller,et al.  Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies , 2003 .

[8]  Sven Steinmo,et al.  Structuring politics : historical institutionalism in comparative analysis , 1992 .

[9]  P. John.  Ideas and Interests; Agendas and Implementation: An Evolutionary Explanation of Policy Change in British Local Government Finance , 1999 .

[10]  W. P. Browne.  Cultivating Congress: Constituents, Issues, and Interests in Agricultural Policymaking , 1995 .

[11]  B. Jones.  Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice, and Public Policy , 1994 .

[12]  E. Ostrom.  A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997 , 1998, American Political Science Review.

[13]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Policy Change And Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach , 1993 .

[14]  Hugh Ward.  The Co-evolution of Regimes of Accumulation and Patterns of Rule: State Autonomy and the Possibility of Functional Responses to Crisis , 2003 .

[15]  K. Dowding.  There Must Be End to Confusion: Policy Networks, Intellectual Fatigue, and the Need for Political Science Methods Courses in British Universities , 2001 .

[16]  Bryan D. Jones,et al.  Policy Punctuations in American Political Institutions , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[17]  B. Jones.  BOUNDED RATIONALITY , 1999 .

[18]  Peter John,et al.  Policy punctuations in the UK: fluctuations and equilibria in central government expenditure since 1951 , 2003 .

[19]  Keith Dowding,et al.  How Not to Use Evolutionary Theory in Politics: A Critique of Peter John , 2000 .

[20]  B. Jones,et al.  The Evolution of Legislative Jurisdictions , 2000, The Journal of Politics.

[21]  Michael Taylor.  The possibility of cooperation , 1987 .

[22]  B. Jones,et al.  The Destruction of Issue Monopolies in Congress , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[23]  Bryan D. Jones,et al.  Policy Punctuations: U.S. Budget Authority, 1947-1995 , 1998, The Journal of Politics.

[24]  W. Runciman,et al.  A Treatise on Social Theory , 1983 .

[25]  P. Sabatier.  Theories of the Policy Process , 1999 .

[26]  S. Steinmo,et al.  The Evolution of Policy Ideas: Tax Policy in the 20th Century , 2003 .

[27]  R. V. D. Peppel.  Analysing public policy , 1999 .

[28]  Keith Dowding,et al.  Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the Policy Network Approach , 1995 .

[29]  B. Jones,et al.  Does incrementalism stem from political consensus or from institutional gridlock , 1997 .

[30]  Bryan D. Jones,et al.  Politics and the Architecture of Choice: Bounded Rationality and Governance , 2001 .

[31]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[32]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[33]  Bryan D. Jones,et al.  Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems , 1991, The Journal of Politics.

[34]  D. Marsh,et al.  Policy networks in British government , 1992 .