Vulnerability and nationalism: the support for the war against Iraq in five established states

This essay attempts to shed light on why aggressive ideas gain support within established western states. To do that it attempts to answer the question why the armed conflict against Iraq received such varied support during the first four months of 2003 within the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, France and Spain. A comparative study indicates that the justifications for the armed conflict must be endorsed in the national identities of the particular states. If not, either the justifications or national identities have to be modified. The dominant elite emerge as essential to this process, as does the public experience of vulnerability. It appears that the war against Iraq received such varied support because the initial definitions of national identities endorsed the justifications for the war to different degrees, the dominant elites promoted different opinions and the people experienced different degrees of vulnerability.

[1]  Friedrich Engels,et al.  FROM THE GERMAN IDEOLOGY , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[2]  K. Holsti.  The state, war, and the state of war: Wars of the third kind , 1958 .

[3]  E. Gellner.  Thought and Change , 1964 .

[4]  M. Mann.  The Social Cohesion of Liberal Democracy , 1970 .

[5]  T. Gurr,et al.  Why Men Rebel. , 1970 .

[6]  J. Urry,et al.  Social theory as science , 1976 .

[7]  T. Nairn.  The Break-Up of Britain , 1978 .

[8]  E. Mendelsohn.  The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge , 1977 .

[9]  J. Larraín.  The concept of ideology , 1980 .

[10]  P. Ricoeur,et al.  Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation , 2016 .

[11]  The politics of social theory , 1981 .

[12]  A. Sen.  Poverty and famines : an essay on entitlement and deprivation , 1983 .

[13]  J. Levy.  Alliance Formation and War Behavior , 1981 .

[14]  P. Kivisto,et al.  Nations Before Nationalism. , 1983 .

[15]  Michael D. Wallace.  Armaments and Escalation , 1982 .

[16]  D. Winterfeldt,et al.  Beyond acceptable risk: On the social acceptability of technologies , 1982 .

[17]  R. Chambers,et al.  Rural Development: Putting the last first , 1983 .

[18]  Russell J. Leng.  When Will They Ever Learn? , 1983 .

[19]  A. Escobar.  Discourse and Power in Development: Michel Foucault and the Relevance of His Work to the Third World* , 1984 .

[20]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[21]  J. Gledhill,et al.  Europe and the People Without History , 1984 .

[22]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  Secondary Analysis of Survey Data , 1985 .

[23]  Catherine Hakim,et al.  Research Design: Strategies and Choices in the Design of Social Research , 1987 .

[24]  David-Hillel Ruben,et al.  Varieties Of Social Explanation: An Introduction To The Philosophy Of Social Science , 1991 .

[25]  M. Douglas.  Risk and Blame , 2018, A Good Position for Birth.

[26]  E. Hobsbawm,et al.  Ethnicity and Nationalism in Europe Today , 1992 .

[27]  Lynn Davidman,et al.  Feminist methods in social research , 1992 .

[28]  M. Mann.  Transition to Modernity: The emergence of modern European nationalism , 1992 .

[29]  B. Dick,et al.  The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies , 1992, Tropical doctor.

[30]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Applications of case study research , 1993 .

[31]  M. Mann.  A Political Theory of Nationalism and its Excesses , 1994 .

[32]  S. V. Evera.  Hypotheses on Nationalism and War , 1994 .

[33]  Diane B. Kunz.  When Money Counts and Doesn't: Economic Power and Diplomatic Objectives , 1994 .

[34]  Michael Ignatieff.  Blood and Belonging: Journeys into the New Nationalism , 1994 .

[35]  P. Stern,et al.  New perspectives on nationalism and war , 1994 .

[36]  T. Scheff.  Bloody Revenge: Emotions, Nationalism and War , 1994 .

[37]  E. Gellner.  Encounters with nationalism , 1994 .

[38]  B. Wisner,et al.  At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters , 1996 .

[39]  Charles Taylor.  The Politics of Recognition , 1995, Campus Wars.

[40]  D. Druckman.  Social-psychological aspects of nationalism , 1995 .

[41]  Steven E. Grosby.  Territoriality: The Transcendental, Primordial Feature of Modern Societies , 1995 .

[42]  R. Hardin.  One for All: The Logic of Group Conflict , 1995 .

[43]  A. Cohen.  personal nationalism: a Scottish view of some rites, rights, and wrongs , 1996 .

[44]  F. Füredi.  Culture of Fear: Risk-Taking and the Morality of Low Expectation , 1997 .

[45]  B. Wisner.  Marginality and vulnerability , 1998 .

[46]  M. Beissinger.  The State of the Nation: Nationalisms that bark and nationalisms that bite: Ernest Gellner and the substantiation of nations , 1998 .

[47]  T. Nairn.  The State of the Nation: The curse of rurality: limits of modernisation theory , 1998 .

[48]  D. Mccrone.  The sociology of nationalism , 1998 .

[49]  B. O’Leary.  The State of the Nation: Ernest Gellner's diagnoses of nationalism: a critical overview, or, what is living and what is dead in Ernest Gellner's philosophy of nationalism? , 1998 .

[50]  M. Kaldor.  New and Old Wars : Organized Violence in a Global Era , 1998 .

[51]  M. Crotty.  The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process , 1998 .

[52]  J. Kleinnijenhuis,et al.  Doing research in political science , 1999 .

[53]  J. Tomlinson.  Globalization and Culture , 1999 .

[54]  J. Hall,et al.  Is America Breaking Apart , 1999 .

[55]  John A. Vasquez,et al.  The Scientific Study of Peace and War: A Text Reader , 1999 .

[56]  B H Morrow,et al.  Identifying and mapping community vulnerability. , 1999, Disasters.

[57]  D. Chester,et al.  Human vulnerability in volcanic environments: the case of Furnas, São Miguel, Azores , 1999 .

[58]  M. Hroch.  Social Preconditions of National Revival in Europe , 2000 .

[59]  Jack Snyder,et al.  From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict , 2000 .

[60]  Arus Yumul,et al.  Reproducing the nation: `banal nationalism' in the Turkish press , 2000 .

[61]  T. Landman.  Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics: An Introduction , 2000 .

[62]  J. Nilsson.  Integrerad regional riskbedömning och riskhantering , 2000 .

[63]  W. Tow,et al.  Australia, the United States and a 'China growing strong': Managing conflict avoidance , 2001 .

[64]  A. Troisi.  Gender differences in vulnerability to social stress A Darwinian perspective , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[65]  A. Steen.  The Question of Legitimacy: Elites and Political Support in Russia , 2001 .

[66]  M. Kivimäki,et al.  Socioeconomic status, hostility and health , 2001 .

[67]  J. Breuilly.  The state and nationalism , 2001 .

[68]  A. Law.  Near and far: banal national identity and the press in Scotland , 2001 .

[69]  Peter Wallensteen,et al.  Armed Conflict, 1989-2000 , 2001 .

[70]  Kevin L. Pollpeter,et al.  The United States and Asia , 2001 .

[71]  Terry Nardin.  The Moral Basis of Humanitarian Intervention , 2002, Ethics & International Affairs.

[72]  M. Goot.  Public opinion and the democratic deficit : Australia and the war against Iraq , 2003 .

[73]  Deborah A. Small,et al.  Recent EFFECTS OF FEAR AND ANGER ON PERCEIVED RISKS OF TERRORISMA National Field Experiment , 2015 .

[74]  J. Kennedy.  A Switzerland of the north? The Nationalistes and a bi‐national Canada* , 2004 .

[75]  S. Condor,et al.  Nation Speaking Unto Nation? Newspapers and National Identity in the Devolved UK , 2004 .

[76]  S. Sörlin,et al.  Den globala nationalismen : Nationalstatens historia och framtid , 2006 .

[77]  J. Macinnes.  Castells' Catalan routes: nationalism and the sociology of identity. , 2006, The British journal of sociology.

[78]  S. Condor,et al.  Where is the British national press? , 2007, The British journal of sociology.

[79]  David A. Welch.  Methods for Development Work and Research: A New Guide for Practitioners , 2007 .

[80]  Jonathan Hearn.  National identity: banal, personal and embedded , 2007 .