Nanometer Scale Titanium Surface Texturing Are Detected by Signaling Pathways Involving Transient FAK and Src Activations

Background It is known that physico/chemical alterations on biomaterial surfaces have the capability to modulate cellular behavior, affecting early tissue repair. Such surface modifications are aimed to improve early healing response and, clinically, offer the possibility to shorten the time from implant placement to functional loading. Since FAK and Src are intracellular proteins able to predict the quality of osteoblast adhesion, this study evaluated the osteoblast behavior in response to nanometer scale titanium surface texturing by monitoring FAK and Src phosphorylations. Methodology Four engineered titanium surfaces were used for the study: machined (M), dual acid-etched (DAA), resorbable media microblasted and acid-etched (MBAA), and acid-etch microblasted (AAMB). Surfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, interferometry, atomic force microscopy, x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Thereafter, those 4 samples were used to evaluate their cytotoxicity and interference on FAK and Src phosphorylations. Both Src and FAK were investigated by using specific antibody against specific phosphorylation sites. Principal Findings The results showed that both FAK and Src activations were differently modulated as a function of titanium surfaces physico/chemical configuration and protein adsorption. Conclusions It can be suggested that signaling pathways involving both FAK and Src could provide biomarkers to predict osteoblast adhesion onto different surfaces.

[1]  M. Peppelenbosch,et al.  Kinome profiling of osteoblasts on hydroxyapatite opens new avenues on biomaterial cell signaling. , 2014, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[2]  H. Zreiqat,et al.  The synergistic effect of hierarchical micro/nano-topography and bioactive ions for enhanced osseointegration. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[3]  M. Monjo,et al.  In Vitro Osteogenic Properties of Two Dental Implant Surfaces , 2012, International journal of biomaterials.

[4]  A. Wennerberg,et al.  Nano Hydroxyapatite-coated Implants Improve Bone Nanomechanical Properties , 2012, Journal of dental research.

[5]  X. Guo,et al.  miR-34s inhibit osteoblast proliferation and differentiation in the mouse by targeting SATB2 , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  H. De Bruyn,et al.  A case-control study assessing oral-health-related quality of life after immediately loaded single implants in healed alveolar ridges or extraction sockets. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[7]  A. Wennerberg,et al.  Histological and three-dimensional evaluation of osseointegration to nanostructured calcium phosphate-coated implants. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[8]  A. Wennerberg,et al.  Genetic Responses to Nanostructured Calcium-phosphate-coated Implants , 2011, Journal of dental research.

[9]  S. Abramson,et al.  Inhibitory effects of iron on bone morphogenetic protein 2–induced osteoblastogenesis , 2011, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[10]  J. Granjeiro,et al.  Biological behavior of pre-osteoblasts on natural hydroxyapatite: a study of signaling molecules from attachment to differentiation. , 2011, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[11]  C. Ferreira,et al.  A simple method for enhancing cell adhesion to hydroxyapatite surface. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[12]  A. Teti,et al.  Expanding the role of Src and protein-tyrosine phosphatases balance in modulating osteoblast metabolism: lessons from mice. , 2010, Biochimie.

[13]  M. Peppelenbosch,et al.  Phosphoproteome reveals an atlas of protein signaling networks during osteoblast adhesion , 2010, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[14]  Y. Sul Electrochemical growth behavior, surface properties, and enhanced in vivo bone response of TiO2 nanotubes on microstructured surfaces of blasted, screw-shaped titanium implants , 2010, International journal of nanomedicine.

[15]  A. Bruni-Cardoso,et al.  On the road to understanding of the osteoblast adhesion: Cytoskeleton organization is rearranged by distinct signaling pathways , 2009, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[16]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[17]  M. Sogayar,et al.  A possible mechanism of low molecular weight protein tyrosine phosphatase (LMW-PTP) activity modulation by glutathione action during human osteoblast differentiation. , 2009, Archives of oral biology.

[18]  M. McKee,et al.  In vitro osteogenesis assays: influence of the primary cell source on alkaline phosphatase activity and mineralization. , 2009, Pathologie-biologie.

[19]  W. Zambuzzi,et al.  Bioactivation of alumina by surface modification: a possibility for improving the applicability of alumina in bone and oral repair. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[20]  J. Granjeiro,et al.  Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[21]  Jan E Ellingsen,et al.  The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment of titanium surface on nanostructural and chemical changes and the growth of MC3T3-E1 cells. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[22]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Structural influence from calcium phosphate coatings and its possible effect on enhanced bone integration , 2009, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[23]  H. Lygre,et al.  Interaction of articaine hydrochloride with prokaryotic membrane lipids , 2009, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[24]  M. Monjo,et al.  In vivo expression of osteogenic markers and bone mineral density at the surface of fluoride-modified titanium implants. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[25]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifications on the early stages of osseointegration. , 2008, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[26]  A. Wennerberg,et al.  Increased bone contact to a calcium-incorporated oxidized commercially pure titanium implant: an in-vivo study in rabbits. , 2008, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[27]  K. Baba,et al.  Photo-induced hydrophilicity enhances initial cell behavior and early bone apposition. , 2008, Clinical oral implants research.

[28]  T. Kurogi,et al.  Enhanced initial cell responses to chemically modified anodized titanium. , 2008, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[29]  Y. Hishikawa,et al.  Enhanced osseointegration by the chemotactic activity of plasma fibronectin for cellular fibronectin positive cells. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[30]  S. Chuang,et al.  Predicting Clustered Dental Implant Survival Using Frailty Methods , 2006, Journal of dental research.

[31]  A. Holmen,et al.  Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[32]  Yang Yang,et al.  Osteoblasts Generate Harder, Stiffer, and More Delamination‐Resistant Mineralized Tissue on Titanium Than on Polystyrene, Associated With Distinct Tissue Micro‐ and Ultrastructure , 2005, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[33]  J. Nebe,et al.  The influence of surface roughness of titanium on β1- and β3-integrin adhesion and the organization of fibronectin in human osteoblastic cells , 2005 .

[34]  Cameron J Wilson,et al.  Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[35]  C. Rubin,et al.  Differential phosphorylation of paxillin in response to surface-bound serum proteins during early osteoblast adhesion. , 2001, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[36]  A. Reddi,et al.  Alkaline phosphatase as a marker of osteoinductive cells , 1986, Calcified Tissue International.

[37]  M. Janal,et al.  Evaluation of a nanometer roughness scale resorbable media-processed surface: a study in dogs. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[38]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. , 2010, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[39]  L. Shapira,et al.  Behavior of two osteoblast-like cell lines cultured on machined or rough titanium surfaces. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[40]  P. Coulthard,et al.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[41]  J. Nebe,et al.  The influence of surface roughness of titanium on beta1- and beta3-integrin adhesion and the organization of fibronectin in human osteoblastic cells. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[42]  X. Guo,et al.  miR-34 s inhibit osteoblast proliferation and differentiation in the mouse by targeting SATB 2 , 2022 .