Reproducibility of the Structural Brain Connectome Derived from Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Rationale Disruptions of brain anatomical connectivity are believed to play a central role in several neurological and psychiatric illnesses. The structural brain connectome is typically derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), which may be influenced by methodological factors related to signal processing, MRI scanners and biophysical properties of neuroanatomical regions. In this study, we evaluated how these variables affect the reproducibility of the structural connectome. Methods Twenty healthy adults underwent 3 MRI scanning sessions (twice in the same MRI scanner and a third time in a different scanner unit) within a short period of time. The scanning sessions included similar T1 weighted and DTI sequences. Deterministic or probabilistic tractography was performed to assess link weight based on the number of fibers connecting gray matter regions of interest (ROI). Link weight and graph theory network measures were calculated and reproducibility was assessed through intra-class correlation coefficients, assuming each scanning session as a rater. Results Connectome reproducibility was higher with data from the same scanner. The probabilistic approach yielded larger reproducibility, while the individual variation in the number of tracked fibers from deterministic tractography was negatively associated with reproducibility. Links connecting larger and anatomically closer ROIs demonstrated higher reproducibility. In general, graph theory measures demonstrated high reproducibility across scanning sessions. Discussion Anatomical factors and tractography approaches can influence the reproducibility of the structural connectome and should be factored in the interpretation of future studies. Our results demonstrate that connectome mapping is a largely reproducible technique, particularly as it relates to the geometry of network architecture measured by graph theory methods.

[1]  Jeremy D. Schmahmann,et al.  Diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging (DSI) tractography of crossing fibers , 2008, NeuroImage.

[2]  Yong He,et al.  Diffusion Tensor Tractography Reveals Abnormal Topological Organization in Structural Cortical Networks in Alzheimer's Disease , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion‐weighted MR imaging , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  M. Breakspear,et al.  The connectomics of brain disorders , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  Jean-Philippe Thiran,et al.  Structural connectomics in brain diseases , 2013, NeuroImage.

[6]  David M. Thomasson,et al.  Reliability of fiber tracking measurements in diffusion tensor imaging for longitudinal study , 2010, NeuroImage.

[7]  Huafu Chen,et al.  Altered functional-structural coupling of large-scale brain networks in idiopathic generalized epilepsy. , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  MultiCenter Reliability of Diffusion Tensor Imaging , 2012, Brain Connect..

[9]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  THE HUMAN CONNECTOME: A COMPLEX NETWORK , 2011, Schizophrenia Research.

[10]  Joseph A. Helpern,et al.  Human brain asymmetry in microstructural connectivity demonstrated by diffusional kurtosis imaging , 2014, Brain Research.

[11]  Jean-Philippe Thiran,et al.  The Connectome Viewer Toolkit: An Open Source Framework to Manage, Analyze, and Visualize Connectomes , 2011, Front. Neuroinform..

[12]  P. Hofman,et al.  Tract Specific Reproducibility of Tractography Based Morphology and Diffusion Metrics , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The human connectome: Origins and challenges , 2013, NeuroImage.

[14]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[15]  Mark P Richardson,et al.  Large scale brain models of epilepsy: dynamics meets connectomics , 2012, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[16]  Susumu Mori,et al.  Fiber tracking: principles and strategies – a technical review , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[17]  J. Osborne Best Practices in Quantitative Methods , 2009 .

[18]  Yang Wang,et al.  Characteristics and variability of structural networks derived from diffusion tensor imaging , 2012, NeuroImage.

[19]  James C. Gee,et al.  Reproducibility of graph metrics of human brain structural networks , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..

[20]  B. Ardekani,et al.  Estimation of tensors and tensor‐derived measures in diffusional kurtosis imaging , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  MR connectomics: Principles and challenges , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[22]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Mapping the Connectome: Multi-Level Analysis of Brain Connectivity , 2012, Front. Neuroinform..

[23]  M. Kubicki,et al.  White matter tract abnormalities between rostral middle frontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus and striatum in first-episode schizophrenia , 2013, Schizophrenia Research.

[24]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Comparison of fiber tracts derived from in-vivo DTI tractography with 3D histological neural tract tracer reconstruction on a macaque brain , 2007, NeuroImage.

[25]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The Human Connectome: A Structural Description of the Human Brain , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[26]  Peter A. Calabresi,et al.  Tract probability maps in stereotaxic spaces: Analyses of white matter anatomy and tract-specific quantification , 2008, NeuroImage.

[27]  Jacobus F. A. Jansen,et al.  The effect and reproducibility of different clinical DTI gradient sets on small world brain connectivity measures , 2010, NeuroImage.

[28]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Between session reproducibility and between subject variability of diffusion MR and tractography measures , 2006, NeuroImage.

[29]  M. Kringelbach,et al.  Great Expectations: Using Whole-Brain Computational Connectomics for Understanding Neuropsychiatric Disorders , 2014, Neuron.

[30]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? , 2007, NeuroImage.

[31]  Guy B. Williams,et al.  QuickBundles, a Method for Tractography Simplification , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[32]  Society of magnetic resonance in medicine , 1990 .

[33]  John S. Duncan,et al.  Identical, but not the same: Intra-site and inter-site reproducibility of fractional anisotropy measures on two 3.0 T scanners , 2010, NeuroImage.

[34]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[35]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  From simple graphs to the connectome: Networks in neuroimaging , 2012, NeuroImage.

[36]  Hervé Abdi,et al.  A comprehensive reliability assessment of quantitative diffusion tensor tractography , 2012, NeuroImage.

[37]  A M Dale,et al.  Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Marcus Kaiser,et al.  The potential of the human connectome as a biomarker of brain disease , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[39]  Mark E. Bastin,et al.  Test–retest reliability of structural brain networks from diffusion MRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[40]  Michael Breakspear,et al.  Graph analysis of the human connectome: Promise, progress, and pitfalls , 2013, NeuroImage.

[41]  O. Sporns,et al.  Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.