Robustness of radiomic breast features of benign lesions and luminal A cancers across MR magnet strengths

Radiomics features extracted from breast lesion images have shown potential in diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer. As clinical institutions transition from 1.5 T to 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), it is helpful to identify robust features across these field strengths. In this study, dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images were acquired retrospectively under IRB/HIPAA compliance, yielding 738 cases: 241 and 124 benign lesions imaged at 1.5 T and 3.0 T and 231 and 142 luminal A cancers imaged at 1.5 T and 3.0 T, respectively. Lesions were segmented using a fuzzy C-means method. Extracted radiomic values for each group of lesions by cancer status and field strength of acquisition were compared using a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for the null hypothesis that two groups being compared came from the same distribution, with p-values being corrected for multiple comparisons by the Holm-Bonferroni method. Two shape features, one texture feature, and three enhancement variance kinetics features were found to be potentially robust. All potentially robust features had areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) statistically greater than 0.5 in the task of distinguishing between lesion types (range of means 0.57-0.78). The significant difference in voxel size between field strength of acquisition limits the ability to affirm more features as robust or not robust according to field strength alone, and inhomogeneities in static field strength and radiofrequency field could also have affected the assessment of kinetic curve features as robust or not. Vendor-specific image scaling could have also been a factor. These findings will contribute to the development of radiomic signatures that use features identified as robust across field strength.

[1]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: investigation of enhancement-variance dynamics. , 2004, Medical physics.

[2]  Xia Li,et al.  Errors in Quantitative Image Analysis due to Platform-Dependent Image Scaling. , 2014, Translational oncology.

[3]  AN Kolmogorov-Smirnov,et al.  Sulla determinazione empírica di uma legge di distribuzione , 1933 .

[4]  C. Metz Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[5]  Andre Dekker,et al.  Radiomics: the process and the challenges. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[6]  Evanthia Kousi,et al.  Quality assurance in MRI breast screening: comparing signal-to-noise ratio in dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging protocols , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Erich P Huang,et al.  Using computer‐extracted image phenotypes from tumors on breast magnetic resonance imaging to predict breast cancer pathologic stage , 2016, Cancer.

[8]  C. Metz,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  A Review of Methods for Correction of Intensity Inhomogeneity in MRI , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Xiaobing Fan,et al.  Kinetic curves of malignant lesions are not consistent across MRI systems: need for improved standardization of breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI acquisition. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  N. Smirnov Table for Estimating the Goodness of Fit of Empirical Distributions , 1948 .

[12]  Geoffrey G. Zhang,et al.  Intrinsic dependencies of CT radiomic features on voxel size and number of gray levels , 2017, Medical physics.

[13]  M L Giger,et al.  Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging. , 1998, Medical physics.

[14]  M. Giger,et al.  Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance images , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Andrzej Materka,et al.  Effects of MRI acquisition parameter variations and protocol heterogeneity on the results of texture analysis and pattern discrimination: an application-oriented study. , 2009, Medical physics.

[16]  Kyunghyun Sung,et al.  Transmit B1+ field inhomogeneity and T1 estimation errors in breast DCE‐MRI at 3 tesla , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  K. Turetschek,et al.  Field strength dependence of MRI contrast enhancement: phantom measurements and application to dynamic breast imaging. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.

[18]  Xiaozhi Yu,et al.  Effects of MRI scanner parameters on breast cancer radiomics , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Artifacts in 3-T MRI: physical background and reduction strategies. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[20]  Luc Bidaut,et al.  The influence of field strength and different clinical breast MRI protocols on the outcome of texture analysis using foam phantoms. , 2011, Medical physics.

[21]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[22]  Tomi Heinonen,et al.  Effect of slice thickness on brain magnetic resonance image texture analysis , 2010, Biomedical engineering online.

[23]  M. Giger,et al.  A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[24]  M. Giger,et al.  Cancerous breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: computerized characterization for image-based prognostic markers. , 2010, Radiology.

[25]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[26]  P. A. Rinck,et al.  Field strength and dose dependence of contrast enhancement by gadolinium-based MR contrast agents , 1999, European Radiology.

[27]  G S Karczmar,et al.  Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters of breast lesions at 1.5 and 3.0 T: a pilot study. , 2015, The British journal of radiology.

[28]  Fiona J Gilbert,et al.  B1 transmission‐field inhomogeneity and enhancement ratio errors in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI (DCE‐MRI) of the breast at 3T , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[29]  Mireille Garreau,et al.  Reproducibility of CT-based bone texture parameters of cancellous calf bone samples: influence of slice thickness. , 2008, European journal of radiology.