At the root of sociality: Working towards emergent, permanent, social affines

Complexity science often uses generative models to study and explain the emergent behavior of humans, human culture, and human patterns of social organization. In spite of this, little is known about how the lowest levels of human social organization came into being. That is, little is known about how the earliest members of our hominini tribe transitioned from being presumably small-groups of ape-like polygamous/promiscuous individuals (beginning perhaps as early as Ardipithecus or Australopithecus after the time of the Pan-Homo split in the late Pliocene to early Pleistocene eras) into family units having stable breeding-bonds, extended families, and clans. What were the causal mechanisms (biological, possibly cognitive, social, and environmental, etc.) that were responsible for the conversion? To confound the issue, it is also possible the conversion process itself was a complex system replete with input sensitivities and path dependencies i.e., a nested complex system. These processes and their distinctive social arrangements may be referred to favorably (as one notable anthropologist has called them) as, “the deep structure of society.” This essay describes applied research that uses discrete event computer modeling techniques in an attempt to model-then-understand a few of the underlying social, environmental, and biological systems present at the root of human sociality; at the root of social complexity.

[1]  B. Chapais Primeval Kinship: How Pair-Bonding Gave Birth to Human Society , 2008 .

[2]  Timothy A. Kohler,et al.  Be there then: a modeling approach to settlement determinants and spatial efficiency among late ancestral pueblo populations of the Mesa Verde region, U.S. southwest , 2000 .

[3]  S. Gavrilets Human origins and the transition from promiscuity to pair-bonding , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Sean Luke,et al.  Agent-Based Modeling Simulation of Social Adaptation and Long-Term Change in Inner Asia , 2006, WCSS.

[5]  E. Westermarck The History Of Human Marriage Vol Iii , 1921 .

[6]  E. Westermarck The History of Human Marriage , 1891 .

[7]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up , 1996 .

[8]  A. Crooks,et al.  A prototype , multi-agent system for the study of the Peopling of the Western Hemisphere , 2011 .

[9]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Agent-based computational models and generative social science , 1999, Complex..

[10]  W. Kennedy,et al.  Sexually differentiated philopatry and dispersal : A demonstration of the Baldwin effect and genetic drift Ovi , 2011 .

[11]  Robert L. Axtell,et al.  Population growth and collapse in a multiagent model of the Kayenta Anasazi in Long House Valley , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  R. Wrangham The behavioural ecology of chimpanzees in Gombe National Park, Tanzania , 1975 .

[13]  C. Lovejoy,et al.  The Great Divides: Ardipithecus ramidus Reveals the Postcrania of Our Last Common Ancestors with African Apes , 2009, Science.

[14]  Bernard Chapais,et al.  Monogamy, strongly bonded groups, and the evolution of human social structure , 2013, Evolutionary anthropology.

[15]  R. Carneiro The Circumscription Theory , 1988 .

[16]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Artificial societies and generative social science , 2006, Artificial Life and Robotics.

[17]  Frank E. Ritter,et al.  Defining Factors of Interest for Large-scale Socio-cognitive Simulations , 2012 .

[18]  J. Mitani,et al.  Territoriality: The relation of ranging pattern and home range size to defendability, with an analysis of territoriality among primate species , 1979, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  M. E. Thompson Reproductive Ecology of Female Chimpanzees , 2013, American journal of primatology.

[20]  R. Sapolsky The Influence of Social Hierarchy on Primate Health , 2005, Science.

[21]  F. D. de Waal,et al.  The Other “Closest Living Relative”: How Bonobos (Pan paniscus) Challenge Traditional Assumptions about Females, Dominance, Intra‐ and Intersexual Interactions, and Hominid Evolution , 2000, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[22]  B. Chapais The Deep Structure of Human Society: Primate Origins and Evolution , 2010 .

[23]  Karen B. Strier,et al.  The Human Community as a Primate Society [and Comments] , 1991, Current Anthropology.