Unsupervised learning algorithm for high-speed defect detection in rails by laser/air-coupled non-contact ultrasonic testing

Recent train accidents and associated direct and indirect costs including cost of repair of equipment and infrastructure as well as delay and death/injury costs, have reaffirmed the need for developing rail defect detection systems more effective than those used today. In fact, rail defect detection has been identified as a priority area in the U.S. Federal Railroad Administration 5-year R&D plan. This paper proposes an unsupervised learning algorithm for defect detection in rails. The algorithm is used in a non-contact inspection system that is targeted to the detection of transverse-type cracks in the rail head (including transverse fissures and detail fractures), notoriously the most dangerous flaws in rails. The system uses ultrasonic guided waves that are generated by a pulsed laser and are detected by air-coupled sensors positioned as far away as 76 mm (3") from the top of rail head. The inspection ranges is at least 500 mm (20") for surface head cracks as shallow as 1 mm. Fast data output is achieved by processing the ultrasonic defect signatures by Wavelet Transform algorithms. The features extracted after wavelet processing are analyzed by a learning algorithm based on novelty detection. This algorithm attempts to detect the presence of damage despite the normal variations in ultrasonic signal features that may be found in a field test.

[1]  Vic Barnett,et al.  Outliers in Statistical Data , 1980 .

[2]  Paul D. Wilcox,et al.  Guided wave testing of rail , 2003 .

[3]  Ivan Bartoli,et al.  High-Speed Defect Detection in Rails by Noncontact Guided Ultrasonic Testing , 2005, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[4]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Novelty detection in a changing environment: Regression and interpolation approaches , 2002 .

[5]  P. Cawley,et al.  The Potential of Ultrasonic Surface Waves for Rail Inspection , 2005 .

[6]  Keith Worden,et al.  STRUCTURAL FAULT DETECTION USING A NOVELTY MEASURE , 1997 .

[7]  Francesco Lanza di Scalea,et al.  Ultrasonic inspection of multi-wire steel strands with the aid of the wavelet transform , 2005 .

[8]  Mahmood Fateh,et al.  Automatic defect classification in long-range ultrasonic rail inspection using a support vector machine-based ?smart system? , 2004 .

[9]  Francesco Lanza di Scalea,et al.  Improvements in noncontact ultrasonic testing of rails by the discrete wavelet transform , 2004 .

[10]  Ivan Bartoli,et al.  Modeling guided wave propagation with application to the long-range defect detection in railroad tracks , 2005 .

[11]  Keith Worden,et al.  DAMAGE DETECTION USING OUTLIER ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[12]  Ivan Bartoli,et al.  Defect Classification in Pipes by Neural Networks Using Multiple Guided Ultrasonic Wave Features Extracted After Wavelet Processing , 2005 .

[13]  Francesco Lanza di Scalea,et al.  Wavelet-based feature extraction for automatic defect classification in strands by ultrasonic structural monitoring , 2006 .

[14]  Joseph L. Rose,et al.  Guided wave inspection potential of defects in rail , 2004 .

[15]  Robin Clark,et al.  Rail flaw detection: overview and needs for future developments , 2004 .

[16]  G. A. Alers Railroad rail flaw detection system based on electromagnetic acoustic transducer , 1992 .

[17]  Peter Cawley,et al.  Practical long range guided wave testing: applications to pipes and rails , 2003 .

[18]  Ivan Bartoli,et al.  Non-contact ultrasonic inspection of rails and signal processing for automatic defect detection and classification , 2005 .

[19]  F. Lanza di Scalea,et al.  Ultrasonic NDE of railroad tracks: air-coupled cross-sectional inspection and long-range inspection , 2003 .

[20]  Joseph L. Rose,et al.  Application and potential of guided wave rail inspection , 2002 .