Evaluation of firms applying to Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award: a modified fuzzy AHP method

Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) is a broadly used performance excellence framework to recognize organizations that have outstanding customer-focused processes. MBNQA system is based on an assessment system using a 0–1000 points scale. However, experts prefer making linguistic assessments rather than exact numerical assignments. Fuzzy set theory presents excellent tools and techniques to capture the vagueness and impreciseness in these assessments. This paper develops a new analytic hierarchy process (AHP)-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach to measure the performance excellence of firms applying for MBNQA. The proposed approach enables experts to use seven different fuzzy scales to evaluate firms using the MBNQA criteria. These fuzzy scales involve both positive fuzzy numbers and negative fuzzy numbers, and present an easier and efficient alternative to the calculations made in pairwise comparison matrices. In this way, the experts filling in a questionnaire can easily understand the reciprocal scale and establish comparison matrices. Using negative fuzzy numbers in AHP scale is the crucial point of this paper. To show the applicability of the method, a numerical example composed of a four-level hierarchy including seven main criteria, 18 sub-criteria, and three alternatives is also given. We use Buckley’s Fuzzy AHP approach for comparative analysis. Our application reveals that the proposed fuzzy AHP approach efficiently measures the quality performance of the firms applying to MBNQA.

[1]  C. Su,et al.  The Taiwan national quality award and market value of the firms: An empirical study , 2013 .

[2]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  A New Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Application to Vendor Selection Problem , 2013, J. Multiple Valued Log. Soft Comput..

[3]  Mao-Jiun J. Wang,et al.  Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value , 1992 .

[4]  Adam S. Maiga,et al.  The association between benchmarking and organizational performance: an empirical investigation , 2004 .

[5]  Miin-Shen Yang,et al.  Establishing performance evaluation structures by fuzzy relation-based cluster analysis , 2008, Comput. Math. Appl..

[6]  Fang-Mei Tseng,et al.  Measuring business performance in the high-tech manufacturing industry: A case study of Taiwan's large-sized TFT-LCD panel companies , 2009 .

[7]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[8]  Robert LIN,et al.  NOTE ON FUZZY SETS , 2014 .

[9]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1983 .

[10]  Rafał Haffer,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A MODEL OF BUSINESS PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FOR ORGANISATIONAL SELF-ASSESSMENT. THE CASE OF POLAND , 2017 .

[11]  Yi-Hsuan Chen,et al.  A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on Balanced Scorecard , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  An Alternative Ranking Approach and Its Usage in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making , 2009, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[13]  L. Porter,et al.  Assessing Business Excellence , 1996 .

[14]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Fuzzy multicriteria analysis for performance evaluation of bus companies , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Irfan Ertugrul,et al.  Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  D. Chang Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP , 1996 .

[17]  Vincent F. Yu,et al.  An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria approach for the performance evaluation of multiple manufacturing plants , 2010, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[18]  Mustafa Yurdakul,et al.  Türk Otomotiv Firmalarının Performans Ölçümü Ve Analizine Yönelik Topsıs Yöntemini Kullanan Bir Örnek Çalışma , 2003 .

[19]  Zaili Yang,et al.  A New Hybrid Decision Making Framework for Prioritising Port Performance Improvement Strategies , 2017 .

[20]  Ali Azadeh,et al.  A Meta heuristic approach for performance assessment of production units , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  Ming-Miin Yu,et al.  Efficiency and effectiveness in railway performance using a multi-activity network DEA model , 2008 .

[22]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award model with municipal government , 2011 .

[23]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  Relative effectiveness of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award categories , 2015 .

[24]  Ming-Lang Tseng,et al.  Implementation and performance evaluation using the fuzzy network balanced scorecard , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[25]  J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[26]  Weisheng Xu,et al.  Evolutionary analysis of the collaboration networks within National Quality Award Projects of China , 2015 .

[27]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  Technology assessment model for sustainable development of LNG terminals , 2018 .

[28]  Ali Azadeh,et al.  An integrated artificial neural network algorithm for performance assessment and optimization of decision making units , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[30]  S. Güven,et al.  A linear programming model for bank balance sheet management , 1997 .

[31]  Dimitrios E. Koulouriotis,et al.  A multicriteria model on calculating the Sustainable Business Excellence Index of a firm with fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS , 2016 .

[32]  L. C. Leung,et al.  On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Ying Luo,et al.  Fuzzy data envelopment analysis based upon fuzzy arithmetic with an application to performance assessment of manufacturing enterprises , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[34]  Taho Yang,et al.  Six-Sigma Project Selection Using National Quality Award Criteria and Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Method , 2008, 2008 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing.

[35]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[36]  Fredrik Nilsson,et al.  Performance measurement at Nordic companies , 2000 .

[37]  Nigel J. Smith,et al.  Application of a fuzzy based decision making methodology to construction project risk assessment , 2007 .