Submillisievert chest dual energy computed tomography: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE To assess if diagnostic dual energy CT (DECT) of the chest can be achieved at submillisievert (sub-mSv) doses. METHODS Our IRB-approved prospective study included 20 patients who were scanned on dual-source multidector CT(MDCT). All patients gave written informed consent for acquisition of additional image series at reduced radiation dose on a dual-source MDCT (80/140 kV) within 10 s after the standard of care acquisition. Dose reduction was achieved by reducing the quality reference milliampere-second, with combined angular exposure control. Four readers, blinded to all clinical data, evaluated the image sets. Image noise, signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratio were assessed. Volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), doselength product (DLP), size specific dose estimate, and effective dose were also recorded. RESULTS The mean age and body mass index of the patients were 71 years ± 9 and 24 kg m-2 ± 3, respectively. Although images became noisier, overall image quality and image sharpness on blended images were considered good or excellent in all cases (20/20). All findings made on the reduced dose images presented with good demarcation. The intraobserver and interobserver agreements were κ = 0.83 and 0.73, respectively. Mean CTDIvol, size specific dose estimate, DLP and effective dose for reduced dose DECT were: 1.3 ± 0.2 mGy, 1.8 ± 0.2 mGy, 51 ± 9.9 mGy.cm and 0.7 ± 0.1 mSv, respectively. CONCLUSION Routine chest DECT can be performed at sub-mSv doses with good image quality and without loss of relevant diagnostic information. Advances in knowledge: (1) Contrast-enhanced DECT of the chest can be performed at sub-mSv doses, down to mean CTDIvol 1.3 mGy and DLP 51 mGy.cm in patients with body mass index <31 kg m-2. (2) To our knowledge, this is the first time that sub-mSv doses have been successfully applied in a patient study using a dual source DECT scanner.

[1]  Alfredo E Farjat,et al.  Dual-Source Single-Energy Multidetector CT Used to Obtain Multiple Radiation Exposure Levels within the Same Patient: Phantom Development and Clinical Validation. , 2017, Radiology.

[2]  C. Roy,et al.  Single source dual energy CT: What is the optimal monochromatic energy level for the analysis of the lung parenchyma? , 2017, European journal of radiology.

[3]  D. Origgi,et al.  Exposure to low dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening and risk of cancer: secondary analysis of trial data and risk-benefit analysis , 2017, British Medical Journal.

[4]  D. Cody,et al.  “How to” incorporate dual-energy imaging into a high volume abdominal imaging practice , 2017, Abdominal Radiology.

[5]  J. Beregi,et al.  Value of ultra-low-dose chest CT with iterative reconstruction for selected emergency room patients with acute dyspnea. , 2016, European journal of radiology.

[6]  E. V. van Beek,et al.  Iterative reconstruction can permit the use of lower X-ray tube current in CT coronary artery calcium scoring. , 2016, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  M. Chung,et al.  Virtual Non-Contrast CT Using Dual-Energy Spectral CT: Feasibility of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring , 2016, Korean journal of radiology.

[8]  Joshua M Wilson,et al.  Virtual Monochromatic Images from Dual-Energy Multidetector CT: Variance in CT Numbers from the Same Lesion between Single-Source Projection-based and Dual-Source Image-based Implementations. , 2016, Radiology.

[9]  Heejin Kwon,et al.  The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. , 2015, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  Mitsuru Ikeda,et al.  Lung nodule detection performance in five observers on computed tomography (CT) with adaptive iterative dose reduction using three-dimensional processing (AIDR 3D) in a Japanese multicenter study: Comparison between ultra-low-dose CT and low-dose CT by receiver-operating characteristic analysis. , 2015, European journal of radiology.

[11]  Seok Jeong Lee,et al.  Ultra-Low-Dose CT of the Thorax Using Iterative Reconstruction: Evaluation of Image Quality and Radiation Dose Reduction. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  Atul Padole,et al.  Submillisievert chest CT with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction techniques. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Rochester,et al.  Use of Water Equivalent Diameter for Calculating Patient Size and Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in CT: The Report of AAPM Task Group 220. , 2014, AAPM report.

[14]  Ho Yun Lee,et al.  Ultra-Low-Dose Chest CT in Patients with Neutropenic Fever and Hematologic Malignancy: Image Quality and Its Diagnostic Performance , 2014, Cancer research and treatment : official journal of Korean Cancer Association.

[15]  Seok Jeong Lee,et al.  Image quality assessment of ultra low-dose chest CT using sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction , 2014, European Radiology.

[16]  He Wang,et al.  Low-Contrast Agent Dose Dual-Energy CT Monochromatic Imaging in Pulmonary Angiography Versus Routine CT , 2013, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  Jianrong Xu,et al.  Optimal Monochromatic Energy Levels in Spectral CT Pulmonary Angiography for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism , 2013, PloS one.

[18]  D. Naidich,et al.  Screening for Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Management of Lung Cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines , 2013 .

[19]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Dual-energy CT-based monochromatic imaging. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  C. McCollough,et al.  Virtual monochromatic imaging in dual-source dual-energy CT: radiation dose and image quality. , 2011, Medical physics.

[21]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. , 2011, Radiology.

[22]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Dual Energy CT of the Chest: How About the Dose? , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[23]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  W. Huda,et al.  Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. , 2008, Radiology.

[25]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  M. Kalra,et al.  Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. , 2004, Radiology.

[27]  P. R. Moran,et al.  High Z elements in human sarcomata: assessment by multienergy CT and neutron activation analysis. , 1980, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  W. Huda Radiation risks: what is to be done? , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  Francis R Verdun,et al.  Iterative reconstruction methods in two different MDCT scanners: physical metrics and 4-alternative forced-choice detectability experiments--a phantom approach. , 2013, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[30]  L. Tanoue Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure , 2009 .