EGFR mutation testing of lung cancer patients – Experiences from Vestfold Hospital Trust

Background. Patients with advanced stage lung cancer and somatic mutations in the epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene are currently treated with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. The Norwegian Lung Cancer Group (NLCG) recommended EGFR testing of all patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) from June 2010. From March 2013, testing of squamous cell carcinomas was terminated. We have analysed how these recommendation were followed at a medium-sized Norwegian hospital and we present data on mutation frequency, retesting and possible explanations for missing test results. Material and methods. All pathology reports for patients diagnosed with NSCLC at Vestfold Hospital Trust were examined for the period June 2010 to December 2013. Mutation analyses were done at the Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital. Results. Material was sent for EGFR analysis for 256 of the 304 eligible patients diagnosed in the period. Material from 48 patients was never sent for EGFR testing, of which five samples consisted of too few tumour cells. For the rest, no obvious reason for omitting EGFR mutation analyses was identified. During the first six months of our study period, material from 25 of 66 NSCLC patients (38%) was not tested, whereas only six of the 118 patients (5%) in 2013 were not tested. For 34 patients, the first tissue specimen contained too few tumour cells and a new sample was sent for EGFR analyses for 11 of these. EGFR mutation was detected in 7.1% of the analysed NSCLC and in 9.4% of adenocarcinomas. Discussion. Especially for patients with advanced stages of NSCLC, EGFR mutation status is necessary for treatment stratification. Our results show that the guidelines were followed increasingly over time for patients diagnosed with NSCLC at the Vestfold Hospital Trust. The establishment of interdisciplinary meetings has improved the diagnostic routines.

[1]  M. Krasnik,et al.  The prevalence of EGFR mutations in non‐small cell lung cancer in an unselected Caucasian population , 2015, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[2]  L. Kleinberg,et al.  EGFR-mutated lunge cancer in a general Norwegian population , 2014 .

[3]  P. Krawczyk,et al.  The efficacy of EGFR gene mutation testing in various samples from non-small cell lung cancer patients: a multicenter retrospective study , 2014, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[4]  M Dietel,et al.  Assessing standardization of molecular testing for non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a worldwide external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for EGFR mutation testing , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  B. Møller,et al.  Years of life lost as a measure of cancer burden on a national level , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  S. Murgu,et al.  Role of the pulmonologist in ordering post-procedure molecular markers in non-small-cell lung cancer: implications for personalized medicine. , 2013, Clinical lung cancer.

[7]  R. Maxfield,et al.  The efficacy of EBUS-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for molecular testing in lung adenocarcinoma. , 2013, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[8]  Chun-Ming Tsai,et al.  Phase III study of afatinib or cisplatin plus pemetrexed in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutations. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  G. Giaccone,et al.  Erlotinib versus docetaxel as second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and wild-type EGFR tumours (TAILOR): a randomised controlled trial. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[10]  I. Petersen,et al.  [Molecular pathological diagnosis in cytopathology of non-small-cell lung cancer. Standardization of specimen processing]. , 2013, Der Pathologe.

[11]  A. Rao,et al.  Reply to comparative study of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation analysis on cytology smears and surgical pathology specimens from primary and metastatic lung carcinomas , 2013, Cancer cytopathology.

[12]  R. Beissner,et al.  Comparative study of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation analysis on cytology smears and surgical pathology specimens from primary and metastatic lung carcinomas , 2013, Cancer cytopathology.

[13]  Robert Brian Jenkins,et al.  Molecular Testing Guideline for Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for EGFR and ALK Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology , 2013, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[14]  J. Mosser,et al.  Biomarkers (BM) France: Results of routine EGFR, HER2, KRAS, BRAF, PI3KCA mutations detection and EML4-ALK gene fusion assessment on the first 10,000 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts). , 2013 .

[15]  I. Petersen,et al.  Diagnose und prädiktive Analysen an zytologischen und bioptischen Tumorproben nicht-kleinzelliger Lungenkarzinome: Aktuelle Strategien und Herausforderungen , 2013, Pneumologie.

[16]  P. Jänne,et al.  New targetable oncogenes in non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  Kunihiko Kobayashi,et al.  Importance of the cytological samples for the epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation test for non‐small cell lung cancer , 2013, Cancer science.

[18]  S. Subramonia-Iyer Method of biopsy and sample quality for genetic mutation testing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer in a community hospital. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  Gillian Ellison,et al.  EGFR mutation testing in lung cancer: a review of available methods and their use for analysis of tumour tissue and cytology samples , 2012, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[20]  M. Salto‐Tellez,et al.  The positive impact of cytological specimens for EGFR mutation testing in non‐small cell lung cancer: a single South East Asian laboratory’s analysis of 670 cases , 2012, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[21]  Åslaug Helland,et al.  Mutasjonstesting ved ikke-småcellet lungekreft , 2012 .

[22]  E. Felip,et al.  Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[23]  L. Kleinberg,et al.  [Mutation testing for non-small-cell lung cancer]. , 2012, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[24]  Masahiro Fukuoka,et al.  Biomarker analyses and final overall survival results from a phase III, randomized, open-label, first-line study of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Asia (IPASS). , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  L. Kleinberg,et al.  EGFR Gene Alterations in a Norwegian Cohort of Lung Cancer Patients Selected for Surgery , 2011, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[26]  Å. Helland,et al.  Sex-specific trends in lung cancer incidence and survival: a population study of 40 118 cases , 2011, Thorax.

[27]  A. Gemma,et al.  F1000 highlights , 2010 .

[28]  L. Tanoue,et al.  Gefitinib or Carboplatin–Paclitaxel in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma , 2010 .

[29]  Lin Huan,et al.  Screening for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Lung Cancer , 2010 .

[30]  T. Mok,et al.  Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  S. Kaasa,et al.  Phase III study by the Norwegian lung cancer study group: pemetrexed plus carboplatin compared with gemcitabine plus carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  R. Bremnes,et al.  Vinorelbine/carboplatin vs gemcitabine/carboplatin in advanced NSCLC shows similar efficacy, but different impact of toxicity , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[33]  Ragnhild Sørum,et al.  Recommended reference: Cancer Registry of Norway. Cancer in Norway 2007 - Cancer incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in Norway, Oslo: Cancer Registry of Norway, 2008. , 2007 .