Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Daniel Pressnitzer,et al. Intelligibility of interrupted and interleaved speech for normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implantees , 2010, Hearing Research.
[2] S Hellman,et al. Effects of noise and noise suppression on speech perception by cochlear implant users. , 1992, Ear and hearing.
[3] P Seligman,et al. Architecture of the Spectra 22 speech processor. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.
[4] Martin Cooke,et al. A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] P. Loizou,et al. Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] Q Summerfield,et al. The contribution of waveform interactions to the perception of concurrent vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] Peter Vary,et al. Digital Speech Transmission: Enhancement, Coding and Error Concealment , 2006 .
[8] Stuart Rosen,et al. THE PERCEPTION OF SPEECH IN FLUCTUATING NOISE , 1993 .
[9] Brian C J Moore,et al. Coding of Sounds in the Auditory System and Its Relevance to Signal Processing and Coding in Cochlear Implants , 2003, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.
[10] William M. Rabinowitz,et al. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants , 1991, Nature.
[11] S. Soli,et al. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] Michael F Dorman,et al. A comparison of the speech understanding provided by acoustic models of fixed-channel and channel-picking signal processors for cochlear implants. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[13] Stefan J. Mauger,et al. Clinical Evaluation of Signal-to-Noise Ratio–Based Noise Reduction in Nucleus® Cochlear Implant Recipients , 2011, Ear and hearing.
[14] Brian C J Moore,et al. Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[15] DeLiang Wang,et al. Speech segregation based on sound localization , 2001, IJCNN'01. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37222).
[16] Thomas Baer,et al. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing‐impaired and normally hearing people , 1997 .
[17] Pam W. Dawson,et al. Perceptually optimized gain function for cochlear implant signal-to-noise ratio based noise reduction. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] Blake S. Wilson,et al. Cochlear implants: A remarkable past and a brilliant future , 2008, Hearing Research.
[19] Yi Hu,et al. A new sound coding strategy for suppressing noise in cochlear implants. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[20] Philipos C Loizou,et al. Factors influencing glimpsing of speech in noise. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] Marc Moonen,et al. Speech Understanding Performance of Cochlear Implant Subjects Using Time–Frequency Masking-Based Noise Reduction , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[22] Michael K. Qin,et al. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] DeLiang Wang,et al. Pitch-based monaural segregation of reverberant speech. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[24] S. Bacon,et al. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[25] DeLiang Wang,et al. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] Q. Fu,et al. Spectral subtraction-based speech enhancement for cochlear implant patients in background noise. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] C. Hwang,et al. Comparison of Mandarin tone and speech perception between advanced combination encoder and continuous interleaved sampling speech-processing strategies in children. , 2012, American journal of otolaryngology.
[28] Colleen Psarros,et al. Speech Recognition with the Nucleus 24 SPEAK, ACE, and CIS Speech Coding Strategies in Newly Implanted Adults , 2002, Ear and hearing.
[29] Astrid van Wieringen,et al. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests , 2011, International journal of audiology.
[30] S. Rosen,et al. Uncomodulated glimpsing in "checkerboard" noise. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] P.C. Laizou,et al. Signal-processing techniques for cochlear implants , 1999, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.
[32] R. Plomp,et al. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] Lauren Calandruccio,et al. Determination of the Potential Benefit of Time-Frequency Gain Manipulation , 2006, Ear and hearing.
[34] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[35] Peggy B Nelson,et al. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[36] A. M. Mimpen,et al. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[37] Astrid van Wieringen,et al. LIST and LINT: Sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[38] G. A. Miller,et al. The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech , 1948 .
[39] Yi Hu,et al. Subspace algorithms for noise reduction in cochlear implants. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[40] B C Moore,et al. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.