Dose-Response Modeling with Summary Data from Developmental Toxicity Studies

Dose-response analysis of binary developmental data (e.g., implant loss, fetal abnormalities) is best done using individual fetus data (identified to litter) or litter-specific statistics such as number of offspring per litter and proportion abnormal. However, such data are not often available to risk assessors. Scientific articles usually present only dose-group summaries for the number or average proportion abnormal and the total number of fetuses. Without litter-specific data, it is not possible to estimate variances correctly (often characterized as a problem of overdispersion, intralitter correlation, or "litter effect"). However, it is possible to use group summary data when the design effect has been estimated for each dose group. Previous studies have demonstrated useful dose-response and trend test analyses based on design effect estimates using litter-specific data from the same study. This simplifies the analysis but does not help when litter-specific data are unavailable. In the present study, we show that summary data on fetal malformations can be adjusted satisfactorily using estimates of the design effect based on historical data. When adjusted data are then analyzed with models designed for binomial responses, the resulting benchmark doses are similar to those obtained from analyzing litter-level data with nested dichotomous models.

[1]  M. D. Hogan,et al.  The impact of litter effects on dose-response modeling in teratology. , 1986, Biometrics.

[2]  B C Allen,et al.  Dose-response assessment for developmental toxicity. I. Characterization of database and determination of no observed adverse effect levels. , 1994, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[3]  P. Catalano,et al.  On Determining the BMD from Multiple Outcomes in Developmental Toxicity Studies when One Outcome is Intentionally Missing , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  M. Festing.  Design and statistical methods in studies using animal models of development. , 2006, ILAR journal.

[5]  D. Krewski,et al.  A simple data transformation for estimating benchmark doses in developmental toxicity experiments. , 1995, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  Brian H. McArdle,et al.  Lines, models, and errors: Regression in the field , 2003 .

[7]  L. Marro,et al.  A Comparison of Methods for Estimating the Benchmark Dose Based on Overdispersed Data from Developmental Toxicity Studies , 1998, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  A. Scott,et al.  A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data. , 1992, Biometrics.

[9]  Jeffrey S Gift,et al.  Introduction to benchmark dose methods and U.S. EPA's benchmark dose software (BMDS) version 2.1.1. , 2011, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[10]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Association Models for Clustered Data with Binary and Continuous Responses , 2010, Biometrics.

[11]  Salomon Sand,et al.  The Benchmark Dose Method—Review of Available Models, and Recommendations for Application in Health Risk Assessment , 2003, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[12]  A. Scott,et al.  Tests for trend in developmental toxicity experiments with correlated binary data. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[13]  Wout Slob,et al.  Shape and steepness of toxicological dose–response relationships of continuous endpoints , 2014, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[14]  Geert Molenberghs,et al.  A hierarchical modeling approach for risk assessment in developmental toxicity studies , 2006, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[15]  Haseman Jk,et al.  Analysis of dichotomous response data from certain toxicological experiments. , 1979 .

[16]  Litter-based methods in developmental toxicity risk assessment , 2004, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[17]  Williams Da,et al.  Estimation bias using the beta-binomial distribution in teratology. , 1988 .

[18]  G. Bieler,et al.  Cluster sampling techniques in quantal response teratology and developmental toxicity studies. , 1995, Biometrics.

[19]  C J Portier,et al.  An evaluation of some methods for fitting dose-response models to quantal-response developmental toxicology data. , 1993, Biometrics.