Comparison of Wave Energy Park Layouts by Experimental and Numerical Methods

An experimental campaign of arrays with direct-driven wave energy converters of point-absorbing type is presented. The arrays consist of six identical floats, moving in six degrees of freedom, and six rotating power take-off systems, based on the design developed at Uppsala University. The goals of the work were to study and compare the performances of three different array layouts under several regular and irregular long-crested waves, and in addition, to determine whether the numerical predictions of the best performing array layouts were confirmed by experimental data. The simulations were executed with a frequency domain model restricted to heave, which is a computationally fast approach that was merged into a genetic algorithm optimization routine and used to find optimal array configurations. The results show that good agreement between experiments and simulations is achieved when the test conditions do not induce phenomena of parametric resonance, slack line and wave breaking. Specific non-linear dynamics or extensive sway motion are not captured by the used model, and in such cases the simulation predictions are not accurate, but can nevertheless be used to get an estimate of the power output.

[1]  M. Göteman,et al.  Experimental and numerical collaborative latching control of wave energy converter arrays , 2018 .

[2]  Malin Göteman,et al.  Wave energy parks with point-absorbers of different dimensions , 2017 .

[3]  Peter A. Troch,et al.  Wave Basin Experiments with Large Wave Energy Converter Arrays to Study Interactions between the Converters and Effects on Other Users in the Sea and the Coastal Area , 2014 .

[4]  H. Bernhoff,et al.  Catch the wave to electricity , 2009, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[5]  P. H. Taylor,et al.  Experimental observation of a near-motion-trapped mode: free motion in heave with negligible radiation , 2015, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  Malin Göteman,et al.  Layout design of wave energy parks by a genetic algorithm , 2018 .

[7]  T. Stallard,et al.  Experimental measurements of irregular wave interaction factors in closely spaced arrays , 2009 .

[8]  Malin Göteman,et al.  A Model Free Control Based on Machine Learning for Energy Converters in an Array , 2018, Big Data Cogn. Comput..

[9]  Richard Manasseh,et al.  Novel experimental modelling of the hydrodynamic interactions of arrays of wave energy converters , 2017 .

[10]  Jens Peter Kofoed,et al.  Experimental Validation of a Wave Energy Converter Array Hydrodynamics Tool , 2017 .

[11]  Malin Göteman,et al.  Performance of a Direct-Driven Wave Energy Point Absorber with High Inertia Rotatory Power Take-off , 2018, Energies.

[12]  Malin Göteman,et al.  Advances and Challenges in Wave Energy Park Optimization—A Review , 2020, Frontiers in Energy Research.

[13]  Peter A. Troch,et al.  Sea-state modification and heaving float interaction factors from physical modelling of arrays of wave energy converters , 2015 .

[14]  Harry B. Bingham,et al.  Multi-directional random wave interaction with an array of cylinders , 2015 .

[15]  Malin Göteman,et al.  Economical layout optimization of wave energy parks clustered in electrical subsystems , 2020 .

[16]  F. X. Correia da Fonseca,et al.  Model testing of an oscillating water column spar-buoy wave energy converter isolated and in array: Motions and mooring forces , 2016 .

[17]  Malin Göteman,et al.  Fast Modeling of Large Wave Energy Farms Using Interaction Distance Cut-Off , 2015 .