A simple computational principle predicts vocal adaptation dynamics across age and error size

The brain uses sensory feedback to correct errors in behavior. Songbirds and humans acquire vocal behaviors by imitating the sounds produced by adults and rely on auditory feedback to correct vocal errors throughout their lifetimes. In both birds and humans, acoustic variability decreases steadily with age following the acquisition of vocal behavior. Prior studies in adults have shown that while sensory errors that fall within the limits of vocal variability evoke robust motor corrections, larger errors do not induce learning. Although such results suggest that younger animals, which have greater vocal variability, might correct large errors more readily than older individuals, it is unknown whether age-dependent changes in variability are accompanied by changes in the speed or magnitude of vocal error correction. We tested the hypothesis that auditory errors evoke greater vocal changes in younger animals and that a common computation determines how sensory information drives motor learning across different ages and error sizes. Consistent with our hypothesis, we found that in songbirds the speed and extent of error correction changes dramatically with age and that age-dependent differences in learning were predicted by a model in which the overlap between sensory errors and the distribution of prior sensory feedback determines the dynamics of adaptation. Our results suggest that the brain employs a simple and robust computational principle to calibrate the rate and magnitude of vocal adaptation across age-dependent changes in behavioral performance and in response to different sensory errors.

[1]  Michale S Fee,et al.  A basal ganglia-forebrain circuit in the songbird biases motor output to avoid vocal errors , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Michael S. Brainard,et al.  Covert skill learning in a cortical-basal ganglia circuit , 2012, Nature.

[3]  Michael S Brainard,et al.  Mechanisms and time course of vocal learning and consolidation in the adult songbird. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  James A. Dinnan Auditory Feedback , 1970 .

[5]  M. Fee,et al.  A hypothesis for basal ganglia-dependent reinforcement learning in the songbird , 2011, Neuroscience.

[6]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis: Draper/Applied Regression Analysis , 1998 .

[7]  Kevin G. Munhall,et al.  Children's Development of Self-Regulation in Speech Production , 2012, Current Biology.

[8]  L. Pinneo On noise in the nervous system. , 1966, Psychological review.

[9]  A. Faisal,et al.  Noise in the nervous system , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  Anne Smith,et al.  Articulatory movements in adolescents: evidence for protracted development of speech motor control processes. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[11]  A. Arnold The effects of castration on song development in zebra finches (Poephila guttata). , 1975, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[12]  P. Mitra,et al.  How sleep affects the developmental learning of bird song , 2005, Nature.

[13]  Gary F. Marcus,et al.  Stepwise acquisition of vocal combinatorial capacity in songbirds and human infants , 2013, Nature.

[14]  A. Doupe,et al.  Contributions of an avian basal ganglia–forebrain circuit to real-time modulation of song , 2005, Nature.

[15]  M. Dresselhaus,et al.  A Specialized Forebrain Circuit for Vocal Babbling in the Juvenile Songbird , 2008 .

[16]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Acoustics of children's speech: developmental changes of temporal and spectral parameters. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  S. Sober,et al.  Vocal learning is constrained by the statistics of sensorimotor experience , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  S. Sober,et al.  Adult birdsong is actively maintained by error correction , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation? , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Samuel J. Sober,et al.  A Lightweight, Headphones-based System for Manipulating Auditory Feedback in Songbirds , 2012, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[21]  Scott E. Bevans,et al.  Effect of visual error size on saccade adaptation in monkey. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  C. Larson,et al.  Auditory feedback control of voice fundamental frequency in school children. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Dynamics of the Vocal Imitation Process: How a Zebra Finch Learns Its Song , 2001, Science.

[24]  Aaron S. Andalman,et al.  Vocal Experimentation in the Juvenile Songbird Requires a Basal Ganglia Circuit , 2005, PLoS biology.

[25]  Richard F. Gunst,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1999, Technometrics.

[26]  M. Fee,et al.  Changes in the neural control of a complex motor sequence during learning. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Jeffery A. Jones,et al.  Auditory Feedback Control of Vocal Pitch during Sustained Vocalization: A Cross-Sectional Study of Adult Aging , 2011, PloS one.

[28]  N. Clayton Song Learning in Bengalese Finches: a Comparison with Zebra Finches , 2010 .

[29]  Jane E. Clark,et al.  Development of visuomotor representations for hand movement in young children , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Age at Deafening Affects the Stability of Learned Song in Adult Male Zebra Finches , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. , 1998, Science.

[32]  Fabio Brugnara,et al.  Acoustic variability and automatic recognition of children's speech , 2007, Speech Commun..

[33]  Samuel J Sober,et al.  Vocal Generalization Depends on Gesture Identity and Sequence , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Jeffery A. Jones,et al.  The relationship between vocal accuracy and variability to the level of compensation to altered auditory feedback , 2012, Neuroscience Letters.

[35]  Nicole M. Russo,et al.  Age-related differences in vocal responses to pitch feedback perturbations: a preliminary study. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  Todd W Troyer,et al.  Development of temporal structure in zebra finch song. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  Kurt A. Thoroughman,et al.  Trial-by-trial transformation of error into sensorimotor adaptation changes with environmental dynamics. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  Mollie K. Marko,et al.  Sensitivity to prediction error in reach adaptation. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  V. Gracco,et al.  Auditory-Motor Learning during Speech Production in 9-11-Year-Old Children , 2010, PloS one.