On Birthing Dancing Stars: The Need for Bounded Chaos in Information Interaction

While computers causing chaos is a common social trope, nearly the entirety of the history of computing is dedicated to generating order. Typical interactive information retrieval tasks ask computers to support the traversal and exploration of large, complex information spaces. The implicit assumption is that they are to support users in simplifying the complexity (i.e. in creating order from chaos). But for some types of task, particularly those that involve the creative application or synthesis of knowledge or the creation of new knowledge, this assumption may be incorrect. It is increasingly evident that perfect order-and the systems we create with it-support highly-structured information tasks well, but provide poor support for less-structured tasks. We need digital information environments that help create a little more chaos from order to spark creative thinking and knowledge creation. This paper argues for the need for information systems that offer what we term 'bounded chaos', and offers research directions that may support the creation of such interfaces

[1]  Nina Reeves,et al.  An ethnographic study of music information seeking: implications for the design of a music digital library , 2003, 2003 Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 2003. Proceedings..

[2]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  What is browsing - really? A model drawing from behavioural science research , 2007, Inf. Res..

[3]  Doug Way,et al.  The Impact of Web-scale Discovery on the Use of a Library Collection , 2010 .

[4]  Sally Jo Cunningham,et al.  'More of an Art than a Science': Supporting the Creation of Playlists and Mixes , 2006, ISMIR.

[5]  Andruid Kerne,et al.  Representing Collections as Compositions to support distributed creative cognition and situated creative learning , 2007, New Rev. Hypermedia Multim..

[6]  Don R. Swanson,et al.  Two medical literatures that are logically but not bibliographically connected , 1987, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services , 2009 .

[8]  George Buchanan,et al.  Information Seeking by Humanities Scholars , 2005, ECDL.

[9]  F. Nietzsche.  Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for All and None , 1883 .

[10]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  The bohemian bookshelf: supporting serendipitous book discoveries through information visualization , 2012, CHI.

[11]  Shanton Chang,et al.  Exploration without keywords: the bookfish case , 2014, OZCHI.

[12]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  The Turn - Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context , 2005, The Kluwer International Series on Information Retrieval.

[13]  Sanda Erdelez,et al.  Information encountering : an exploration beyond information seeking , 1995 .

[14]  R. Fidel.  Qualitative methods in information retrieval research. , 1993 .

[15]  Andruid Kerne,et al.  CollageMachine: temporality and indeterminacy in media browsing via interface ecology , 1997, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[16]  David Bawden,et al.  Perspectives on information overload , 1999 .

[17]  George Buchanan,et al.  A library or just another information resource? A case study of users' mental models of traditional and digital libraries , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  Data Portraits: Connecting People of Opposing Views , 2013, ArXiv.

[19]  Ann Blandford,et al.  From physical to digital: a case study of computer scientists’ behaviour in physical libraries , 2003, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[20]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  A sign of a good book: readers' methods of accessing fiction in the public library , 2013, J. Documentation.

[21]  Tuck Wah Leong,et al.  The serendipity shuffle , 2005, OZCHI.

[22]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau,et al.  Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective , 1991, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[23]  Eli Pariser.  FILTER BUBBLE: Wie wir im Internet entmündigt werden , 2012 .

[24]  J. Stephen Downie,et al.  Everyday Life Music Information-Seeking Behaviour of Young Adults , 2006, ISMIR.

[25]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm , 2009, Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm.

[26]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  A Systems Perspective on Creativity , 2006 .

[27]  Jeroen van den Hoven,et al.  Breaking the filter bubble: democracy and design , 2015, Ethics and Information Technology.

[28]  J. Overhage,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[29]  Wyoma vanDuinkerken,et al.  User Expectations in the Time of Google: Usability Testing of Federated Searching , 2007 .

[30]  Max L. Wilson.  The Tetris Model of Resolving Information Needs within the Information Seeking Process , 2017, CHIIR.

[31]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Children's Searching Behavior on Browsing and Keyword Online Catalogs: The Science Library Catalog Project , 1995, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[32]  David Lazer,et al.  Auditing Partisan Audience Bias within Google Search , 2018, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[33]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  Are e-books replacing print books? tradition, serendipity, and opportunity in the adoption and use of e-books for historical research and teaching , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[34]  Thomas Mann,et al.  The Peloponnesian War and the Future of Reference, Cataloging, and Scholarship in Research Libraries , 2008 .

[35]  Dana McKay,et al.  Manoeuvres in the Dark: Design Implications of the Physical Mechanics of Library Shelf Browsing , 2017, CHIIR.

[36]  George Buchanan,et al.  Tyranny of Distance: Understanding Academic Library Browsing by Refining the Neighbour Effect , 2015, TPDL.

[37]  Tamar Sadeh.  Time for a change: new approaches for a new generation of library users , 2007 .

[38]  Lois Ann Scheidt,et al.  It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens , 2015, New Media Soc..

[39]  Ben Conyers,et al.  Where the streets have no name: how library users get lost in the stacks , 2010, CHINZ '10.

[40]  Andrei Broder,et al.  A taxonomy of web search , 2002, SIGF.

[41]  Janet Sternberg,et al.  Managing deviant behavior in online communities , 2006, CHI EA '06.

[42]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Coming across academic social media content serendipitously , 2012, ASIST.

[43]  Ann Blandford,et al.  “Making my own luck”: Serendipity strategies and how to support them in digital information environments , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[44]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Exploratory search , 2006, Commun. ACM.

[45]  Mitchell Whitelaw,et al.  Generous Interfaces for Digital Cultural Collections , 2015, Digit. Humanit. Q..

[46]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Accessing and Browsing Information and Communication , 2001 .

[47]  Stephann Makri,et al.  'Too Much Serendipity': The Tension between Information Seeking and Encountering at the Library Shelves , 2017, CHIIR.

[48]  Mark Sanderson,et al.  Test Collection Based Evaluation of Information Retrieval Systems , 2010, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..

[49]  George Buchanan,et al.  The Things We Talk About When We Talk About Browsing: An Empirical Typology of Library Browsing Behavior , 2019, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[50]  Elizabeth B. Cooksey,et al.  Too Important to Be Left to Chance—Serendipity and the Digital Library , 2004 .

[51]  Pamela J. McKenzie.  A model of information practices in accounts of everyday-life information seeking , 2003, J. Documentation.

[52]  Justin M. Rao,et al.  Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption , 2016 .

[53]  Micheline Hancock-Beaulieu,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of an Online Library Catalogue on subject Searching behaviour at the Catalogue and T the shelves , 1991, J. Documentation.

[54]  George Buchanan,et al.  On the other side from you: how library design facilitates and hinders group work , 2014, OZCHI.

[55]  John Baer,et al.  Evaluative thinking, creativity, and task specificity: Separating wheat from chaff is not the same as finding needles in haystacks. , 2003 .

[56]  R. McCrae.  Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. , 1987 .

[57]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Why are online catalogsstill hard to use , 1996 .

[58]  Elaine Toms,et al.  The process of serendipity in knowledge work , 2010, IIiX.

[59]  Sara Randall.  Federated searching and usability testing: Building the perfect beast , 2006 .

[60]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Electronic Journals and Changes in Scholarly Article Seeking and Reading Patterns , 2008, D Lib Mag..

[61]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study , 2003, J. Documentation.

[62]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Analogical problem solving , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[63]  George Buchanan,et al.  It ain't what you do, it's the way that you do it: Design guidelines to better support online browsing , 2018, ASIST.

[64]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Ask for Information Retrieval: Part I. Background and Theory , 1997, J. Documentation.

[65]  Eli Pariser,et al.  The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You , 2011 .

[66]  Kamy Ooi,et al.  How Adult Fiction Readers Select Fiction Books  in Public Libraries: a Study of Information-Seeking in Context , 2008 .

[67]  Abigail McBirnie,et al.  Seeking serendipity: the paradox of control , 2008, Aslib Proc..

[68]  Ryen W. White,et al.  The Use of Implicit Evidence for Relevance Feedback in Web Retrieval , 2002, ECIR.

[69]  Annika Hinze,et al.  Book selection behavior in the physical library: implications for ebook collections , 2012, JCDL '12.

[70]  David M. Nichols,et al.  Talking in the library: implications for the design of digital libraries , 1997, DL '97.

[71]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Why Are Online Catalogs Still Hard to Use? , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[72]  Eike Kleiner.  Blended shelf: reality-based presentation and exploration of library collections , 2013, ISI.

[73]  P. Kay,et al.  What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis? , 1983 .

[74]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Information Seeking in Electronic Environments , 1995 .

[75]  Stephann Makri,et al.  After serendipity strikes: Creating value from encountered information , 2017, ASIST.

[76]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Fit4life: the design of a persuasive technology promoting healthy behavior and ideal weight , 2011, CHI.

[77]  Jarmo Saarti.  Feeding with the spoon, or the effects of shelf classification of fiction on the loaning of fiction , 1997 .

[78]  Dana McKay,et al.  Something is Lost, Something is Found: Book Use at the Library Shelves , 2017, CHIIR.

[79]  Kathleen Gray,et al.  The nature and constitution of informal carers' information needs: what you don't know you need is as important as what you want to know , 2013, Inf. Res..

[80]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Understanding Information Behaviour: How Do Students and Faculty Find Books? , 2008 .

[81]  Marcia J. Bates.  The Fallacy of the Perfect Thirty-Item Online Search , 2016 .

[82]  Michael Khoo,et al.  What Would 'Google' Do? Users' Mental Models of a Digital Library Search Engine , 2012, TPDL.

[83]  Elaine Svenonius.  The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization , 2000 .

[84]  Charles L. A. Clarke,et al.  Novelty and diversity in information retrieval evaluation , 2008, SIGIR '08.

[85]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface , 1989 .

[86]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Information Retrieval Interaction , 1992 .

[87]  George Buchanan,et al.  Boxing clever: how searchers use and adapt to a one-box library search , 2013, OZCHI.

[88]  Azi Lev-On,et al.  Happy Accidents: Deliberation and Online Exposure to Opposing Views , 2009 .

[89]  Dana McKay.  Gotta keep 'em separated: why the single search box may not be right for libraries , 2011, CHINZ '11.

[90]  Tammera M. Race,et al.  Resource Discovery Tools: Supporting Serendipity , 2012 .

[91]  Charles L. Viles,et al.  User effort in query construction and interface selection , 2000, DL '00.

[92]  Vannevar Bush,et al.  As we may think , 1945, INTR.

[93]  Dana McKay,et al.  Down the Superhighway in a Single Tome: Examining the Impact of Book Format on Borrowing Interactions , 2015, OZCHI.

[94]  S. Erdelez.  Information encountering: a conceptual framework for accidental information discovery , 1997 .

[95]  Dana McKay,et al.  One Way or Another I'm Gonna Find Ya: The Influence of Input Mechanism on Scrolling in Complex Digital Collections , 2019, 2019 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL).

[96]  A. Arvidsson,et al.  Echo Chamber or Public Sphere? Predicting Political Orientation and Measuring Political Homophily in Twitter Using Big Data , 2014 .

[97]  Don R. Swanson,et al.  Historical note: Information retrieval and the future of an illusion , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[98]  Stephen E. Robertson,et al.  On the history of evaluation in IR , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..

[99]  David Bawden,et al.  The dark side of information: overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies , 2009, J. Inf. Sci..

[100]  Raya Fidel,et al.  Human Information Interaction: An Ecological Approach to Information Behavior , 2012 .