Mechanical Modulation of Cartilage Structure and Function During Embryogenesis in the Chick

The mechanical behavior of cartilage is intimately related to its biochemical composition, and tissue composition is known to be influenced by its local mechanical loading environment. Although this phenomenon has been well-studied in adult cartilage, few investigations have examined such structure–function relationships in embryonic cartilage. The goal of this work was to elucidate the role of mechanical loading on the development of cartilage composition during embryogenesis. Using an embryonic chick model, cartilage from the tibiofemoral joints of immobilized embryos was compared to that of controls. The normal time course of changes in glycosaminoglycan/DNA and hydroxyproline/DNA were significantly influenced by loading history, with the most pronounced effects observed between days 9 and 14 during the period of most rapid increase in motility in control embryos. Stress-relaxation tests conducted on samples from day 14 indicate that the effects of embryonic immobilization on cartilage matrix composition have direct consequences for the mechanical behavior of the tissue, resulting in compromised material properties (e.g. 50% reduction in Einst). Because embryogenesis provides a unique model for identifying key factors which influence the establishment of functional biomechanical tissues in the skeleton, these data suggest that treating mechanical loading as an in vitro culture variable for tissue engineering approaches to cartilage repair is likely to be a sound approach.

[1]  D. Stocum,et al.  Development of the tibiotarsus in the chick embryo: biosynthetic activities of histologically distinct regions. , 1979, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[2]  R M Aspden,et al.  Effects of mechanical load on cartilage matrix biosynthesis in vitro. , 1991, Matrix.

[3]  van de Stadt Rj,et al.  Effects of loading on the synthesis of proteoglycans in different layers of anatomically intact articular cartilage in vitro. , 1992, The Journal of rheumatology.

[4]  V. Hamburger,et al.  Observations and experiments on spontaneous rhythmical behavior in the chick embryo. , 1963, Developmental biology.

[5]  A. Grodzinsky,et al.  Mechanical regulation of cartilage biosynthetic behavior: physical stimuli. , 1994, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[6]  M. Chiquet,et al.  Mechanical modulation of tenascin‐C and collagen‐XII expression during avian synovial joint formation , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[7]  A. K. Williamson,et al.  Growth Responses of Cartilage to Static and Dynamic Compression , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  T. Sandström,et al.  The effect of continuous mechanical pressure upon the turnover of articular cartilage proteoglycans in vitro. , 1982, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  Albert C. Chen,et al.  Static and dynamic compression modulate matrix metabolism in tissue engineered cartilage , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[10]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Functional tissue engineering: the role of biomechanics in articular cartilage repair. , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  T D Brown,et al.  Experimental determination of the linear biphasic constitutive coefficients of human fetal proximal femoral chondroepiphysis. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  H. Helminen,et al.  Local stimulation of proteoglycan synthesis in articular cartilage explants by dynamic compression in vitro , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[13]  D. Mitrovic Development of the articular cavity in paralyzed chick embryos and in chick embryo limb buds cultured on chorioallantoic membranes. , 1982, Acta anatomica.

[14]  I. Martin,et al.  Development and validation of a bioreactor for physical stimulation of engineered cartilage. , 2003, Biorheology.

[15]  J. C. Copray,et al.  Effects of compressive forces on proliferation and matrix synthesis in mandibular condylar cartilage of the rat in vitro. , 1985, Archives of oral biology.

[16]  S W O'Driscoll,et al.  Periosteum responds to dynamic fluid pressure by proliferating in vitro , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[17]  A. Grodzinsky,et al.  Biosynthetic response of cartilage explants to dynamic compression , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  G A Ateshian,et al.  Functional tissue engineering of articular cartilage through dynamic loading of chondrocyte-seeded agarose gels. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[19]  R. Oppenheim,et al.  Periodic motility of normal and spinal chick embryos between 8 and 17 days of incubation. , 1965, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[20]  I. Siegel,et al.  Injury and Repair of the Musculoskeletal Soft Tissues , 1988 .

[21]  V. Mow,et al.  Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression? Theory and experiments. , 1980, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[22]  E B Hunziker,et al.  Mechanical compression modulates matrix biosynthesis in chondrocyte/agarose culture. , 1995, Journal of cell science.

[23]  A. Grodzinsky,et al.  Fluorometric assay of DNA in cartilage explants using Hoechst 33258. , 1988, Analytical biochemistry.

[24]  L. Creemers,et al.  Microassay for the assessment of low levels of hydroxyproline. , 1997, BioTechniques.

[25]  R. Schneiderman,et al.  Effects of mechanical and osmotic pressure on the rate of glycosaminoglycan synthesis in the human adult femoral head cartilage: An in vitro study , 1986, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[26]  D. Buttle,et al.  Improved quantitation and discrimination of sulphated glycosaminoglycans by use of dimethylmethylene blue. , 1986, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[27]  G. Lust,et al.  Effect of compressive loading and unloading on the synthesis of total protein, proteoglycan, and fibronectin by canine cartilage explants , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[28]  Gerard A. Ateshian,et al.  Influence of Seeding Density and Dynamic Deformational Loading on the Developing Structure/Function Relationships of Chondrocyte-Seeded Agarose Hydrogels , 2002, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  K. Brandt,et al.  Effects of static and cyclic compressive loading on articular cartilage plugs in vitro. , 1984, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[30]  A Ratcliffe,et al.  The effects of matrix compression on proteoglycan metabolism in articular cartilage explants. , 1994, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[31]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Structure and function of embryonic growth plate in the absence of functioning skeletal muscle , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[32]  Albert C. Chen,et al.  Compressive properties and function—composition relationships of developing bovine articular cartilage , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[33]  A. Grodzinsky,et al.  Mechanical and physicochemical determinants of the chondrocyte biosynthetic response , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[34]  J. C. Copray,et al.  Effects of polypeptide growth factors on mandibular condylar cartilage of the rat in vitro. , 1988, Journal de biologie buccale.