Pleiotropic functions of a conserved insect-specific Hox peptide motif

The proteins that regulate developmental processes in animals have generally been well conserved during evolution. A few cases are known where protein activities have functionally evolved. These rare examples raise the issue of how highly conserved regulatory proteins with many roles evolve new functions while maintaining old functions. We have investigated this by analyzing the function of the `QA' peptide motif of the Hox protein Ultrabithorax (Ubx), a motif that has been conserved throughout insect evolution since its establishment early in the lineage. We precisely deleted the QA motif at the endogenous locus via allelic replacement in Drosophila melanogaster. Although the QA motif was originally characterized as involved in the repression of limb formation, we have found that it is highly pleiotropic. Curiously, deleting the QA motif had strong effects in some tissues while barely affecting others, suggesting that QA function is preferentially required for a subset of Ubx target genes. QA deletion homozygotes had a normal complement of limbs, but, at reduced doses of Ubx and the abdominal-A (abd-A) Hox gene, ectopic limb primordia and adult abdominal limbs formed when the QA motif was absent. These results show that redundancy and the additive contributions of activity-regulating peptide motifs play important roles in moderating the phenotypic consequences of Hox protein evolution, and that pleiotropic peptide motifs that contribute quantitatively to several functions are subject to intense purifying selection.

[1]  W. McGinnis,et al.  Evolutionarily conserved domains required for activation and repression functions of the Drosophila Hox protein Ultrabithorax , 2005, Development.

[2]  E. Davidson Genomic Regulatory Systems: Development and Evolution , 2005 .

[3]  S. Carroll,et al.  Evolution at Two Levels: On Genes and Form , 2005, PLoS biology.

[4]  L. Pick,et al.  Cofactor-Interaction Motifs and the Cooption of a Homeotic Hox Protein into the Segmentation Pathway of Drosophila melanogaster , 2005, Current Biology.

[5]  S. Carroll,et al.  Direct regulation of knot gene expression by Ultrabithorax and the evolution of cis-regulatory elements in Drosophila , 2005, Development.

[6]  Y. Tomoyasu,et al.  Ultrabithorax is required for membranous wing identity in the beetle Tribolium castaneum , 2005, Nature.

[7]  D. J. McKay,et al.  Direct integration of Hox and segmentation gene inputs during Drosophila development , 2004, Nature.

[8]  M. Lynch,et al.  The Origins of Genome Complexity , 2003, Science.

[9]  P. Bryant,et al.  Genetic analysis of the ADGF multigene family by homologous recombination and gene conversion in Drosophila. , 2003, Genetics.

[10]  R. Lamb,et al.  Functional divergence within the APETALA3/PISTILLATA floral homeotic gene lineages , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  William McGinnis,et al.  Evolution of transcription factor function. , 2003, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[12]  S. Carroll,et al.  Quantitative trait loci responsible for variation in sexually dimorphic traits in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2003, Genetics.

[13]  M. Laubichler Review of: Carroll, Sean B., Jennifer K. Grenier and Scott D. Weatherbee: From DNA to diversity : molecular genetics and the evolution of animal design. Malden, Mass [u.a.]: Blackwell Science 2001 , 2003 .

[14]  N. Gostling,et al.  From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design , 2002, Heredity.

[15]  R. Mann,et al.  Specificity of Distalless repression and limb primordia development by abdominal Hox proteins. , 2002, Developmental cell.

[16]  S. Carroll,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of selector gene function and evolution. , 2002, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[17]  S. Hayashi,et al.  Evolving role of Antennapedia protein in arthropod limb patterning. , 2002, Development.

[18]  S. Carroll,et al.  Hox repression of a target gene: extradenticle-independent, additive action through multiple monomer binding sites. , 2002, Development.

[19]  G. Rubin,et al.  Targeted mutagenesis by homologous recombination in D. melanogaster. , 2002, Genes & development.

[20]  T. Kaufman,et al.  Exploring the myriapod body plan: expression patterns of the ten Hox genes in a centipede. , 2002, Development.

[21]  William McGinnis,et al.  Hox protein mutation and macroevolution of the insect body plan , 2002, Nature.

[22]  Sean B. Carroll,et al.  Evolution of a transcriptional repression domain in an insect Hox protein , 2002, Nature.

[23]  Urs Schmidt-Ott,et al.  A single Hox3 gene with composite bicoid and zerknüllt expression characteristics in non-Cyclorrhaphan flies , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Targeted mutagenesis by homologous recombination in Drosophila melanogaster , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[25]  S. Jia,et al.  Transcriptional repression: the long and the short of it. , 2001, Genes & development.

[26]  M. Akam,et al.  Evolution of Ftz protein function in insects , 2001, Current Biology.

[27]  L. Pick,et al.  Drosophila fushi tarazu a gene on the border of homeotic function , 2001, Current Biology.

[28]  Y. Rong,et al.  A targeted gene knockout in Drosophila. , 2001, Genetics.

[29]  W. Bender,et al.  P element homing to the Drosophila bithorax complex. , 2000, Development.

[30]  D. Stern PERSPECTIVE: EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY AND THE PROBLEM OF VARIATION , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[31]  Y. Rong,et al.  Gene targeting by homologous recombination in Drosophila. , 2000, Science.

[32]  G. Church,et al.  Microarray analysis of the transcriptional network controlled by the photoreceptor homeobox gene Crx , 2000, Current Biology.

[33]  S. Carroll,et al.  Functional evolution of the Ultrabithorax protein. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Aneel K. Aggarwal,et al.  Structure of a DNA-bound Ultrabithorax–Extradenticle homeodomain complex , 1999, Nature.

[35]  S. Carroll,et al.  Ultrabithorax function in butterfly wings and the evolution of insect wing patterns , 1999, Current Biology.

[36]  D. Stern A role of Ultrabithorax in morphological differences between Drosophila species , 1998, Nature.

[37]  A Auerbach,et al.  Drosophila engrailed can substitute for mouse Engrailed1 function in mid-hindbrain, but not limb development. , 1998, Development.

[38]  R. White,et al.  Nucleocytoplasmic localisation of extradenticle protein is spatially regulated throughout development in Drosophila. , 1997, Development.

[39]  J. B. Jaynes,et al.  A conserved region of engrailed, shared among all en-, gsc-, Nk1-, Nk2- and msh-class homeoproteins, mediates active transcriptional repression in vivo. , 1996, Development.

[40]  A. Mccarthy Development , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[41]  S. Carroll,et al.  The Development of Crustacean Limbs and the Evolution of Arthropods , 1995, Science.

[42]  E. Lewis,et al.  Complete sequence of the bithorax complex of Drosophila. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  J. B. Jaynes,et al.  Inserting the Ftz homeodomain into engrailed creates a dominant transcriptional repressor that specifically turns off Ftz target genes in vivo. , 1995, Development.

[44]  P. Callaerts,et al.  Induction of ectopic eyes by targeted expression of the eyeless gene in Drosophila. , 1995, Science.

[45]  M. Cleary,et al.  Pbx proteins display hexapeptide-dependent cooperative DNA binding with a subset of Hox proteins. , 1995, Genes & development.

[46]  J. Botas,et al.  Direct regulation of decapentaplegic by Ultrabithorax and its role in Drosophila midgut morphogenesis , 1994, Cell.

[47]  C. Rieder,et al.  Greatwall kinase , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[48]  L. Pick,et al.  The mouse Hox-1.3 gene is functionally equivalent to the Drosophila Sex combs reduced gene. , 1993, Genes & development.

[49]  Juan Botas,et al.  Homeotic genes of the bithorax complex repress limb development in the abdomen of the Drosophila embryo through the target gene Distal-less , 1992, Cell.

[50]  D. Labie,et al.  Molecular Evolution , 1991, Nature.

[51]  S. Cohen,et al.  Establishment of imaginal discs and histoblast nests in Drosophila , 1991, Mechanisms of Development.

[52]  T. Sato,et al.  The Ultrabithorax gene of Drosophila and the specification of abdominal histoblasts. , 1991, Developmental biology.

[53]  W. McGinnis,et al.  Human Hox-4.2 and Drosophila Deformed encode similar regulatory specificities in Drosophila embryos and larvae , 1990, Cell.

[54]  K. Schughart,et al.  Mouse Hox-2.2 specifies thoracic segmental identity in Drosophila embryos and larvae , 1990, Cell.

[55]  F. Karch,et al.  abdA expression in Drosophila embryos. , 1990, Genes & development.

[56]  R. Mann,et al.  Functional dissection of ultrabithorax proteins in D. melanogaster , 1990, Cell.

[57]  S. Cohen Specification of limb development in the Drosophila embryo by positional cues from segmentation genes , 1990, Nature.

[58]  M. Krasnow,et al.  Transcriptional activation and repression by Ultrabithorax proteins in cultured Drosophila cells , 1989, Cell.

[59]  M. Krasnow,et al.  An Ultrabithorax protein binds sequences near its own and the Antennapedia P1 promoters , 1988, Cell.

[60]  M. Wilcox,et al.  Protein products of the bithorax complex in Drosophila , 1984, Cell.

[61]  E. Lewis,et al.  Molecular Genetics of the Bithorax Complex in Drosophila melanogaster , 1983, Science.

[62]  K. Madhavan,et al.  Morphogenesis of the epidermis of adult abdomen of Drosophila. , 2017, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[63]  E. Lewis A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila , 1978, Nature.

[64]  A. Garcı́a-Bellido Genetic control of wing disc development in Drosophila. , 2008, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[65]  E. Lewis Genes and Developmental Pathways , 1963 .

[66]  S. Wright,et al.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations. , 1931, Genetics.