Liver fibrosis: noninvasive assessment with MR elastography versus aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index.

PURPOSE To prospectively compare the sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography with those of the routinely available aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) test for staging hepatic fibrosis in patients who have undergone liver biopsy for suspicion of chronic liver disease, with histopathologic examination as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was approved by the ethics committee. All patients gave written informed consent. Eighty-eight patients (37 men, 51 women; mean age, 54.0 years +/- 13.1 [standard deviation]) who underwent liver biopsy for suspicion of chronic liver disease underwent MR elastography and APRI testing within 2 days after liver biopsy. At histopathologic examination, the fibrosis stage was assessed according to METAVIR scores (fibrosis scores F0 [no fibrosis] to F4 [cirrhosis]). MR elastography was performed by transmitting mechanical waves within the liver and measuring the small cyclic displacement of the liver spins with a phase-contrast spin-echo sequence. The performances of MR elastography and APRI testing were assessed, and the optimal cutoff values for fibrosis stage were determined with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS At MR elastography, areas under the ROC curves (A(z)) for elasticity and viscosity, respectively, were 0.999 and 0.863 at fibrosis scores greater than or equal to F2, 0.997 and 0.962 at scores greater than or equal to F3, and 1.000 and 0.986 at score F4. A(z) values for elasticity at MR were significantly larger than those for the APRI (0.854 at scores > or = F2, P < .001; 0.886 at scores > or = F3, P = .003; and 0.851 at score F4, P = .004). Optimal cutoff values of elasticity were 2.5 kPa for fibrosis scores greater than or equal to F2, 3.1 kPa for scores greater than or equal to F3, and 4.3 kPa for score F4. CONCLUSION Large A(z) values for elasticity (>0.990 for scores > or = F2, > or = F3, and F4) show that MR elastography was accurate in liver fibrosis staging and superior to biochemical testing with APRIs.

[1]  J. McHutchison,et al.  Clinical use of hyaluronic acid as a predictor of fibrosis change in hepatitis C , 2003, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology.

[2]  E. Korn Sample size tables for bounding small proportions. , 1986, Biometrics.

[3]  E. Mezey,et al.  Sampling variability on percutaneous liver biopsy. , 1979, Archives of internal medicine.

[4]  L. Castéra,et al.  Pain experienced during percutaneous liver biopsy , 1999, Hepatology.

[5]  D. Rockey,et al.  Noninvasive measures of liver fibrosis , 2006, Hepatology.

[6]  B. V. Van Beers,et al.  Hepatic flow parameters measured with MR imaging and Doppler US: correlations with degree of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. , 2003, Radiology.

[7]  F. Degos,et al.  Practices of Liver Biopsy in France: Results of a Prospective Nationwide Survey , 2000, Hepatology.

[8]  Richard L Ehman,et al.  MR elastography of the liver: preliminary results. , 2006, Radiology.

[9]  R. Contreras,et al.  Noninvasive diagnosis of liver cirrhosis using DNA sequencer–based total serum protein glycomics , 2004, Nature Network Boston.

[10]  B. Maharaj,et al.  SAMPLING VARIABILITY AND ITS INFLUENCE ON THE DIAGNOSTIC YIELD OF PERCUTANEOUS NEEDLE BIOPSY OF THE LIVER , 1986, The Lancet.

[11]  Claude B Sirlin,et al.  Liver fibrosis: noninvasive diagnosis with double contrast material-enhanced MR imaging. , 2006, Radiology.

[12]  A. Cohen,et al.  Comparison of correlated correlations. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  Wen-Chun Yeh,et al.  Elastic modulus measurements of human liver and correlation with pathology. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  P. Bedossa,et al.  An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C , 1996, Hepatology.

[15]  P. Bedossa,et al.  Intraobserver and Interobserver Variations in Liver Biopsy Interpretation in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C , 1994 .

[16]  Nathalie Wong,et al.  Prediction of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis B infection by serum proteomic fingerprinting: a pilot study. , 2005, Clinical chemistry.

[17]  V. de Lédinghen,et al.  Diagnosis of cirrhosis by transient elastography (FibroScan): a prospective study , 2005, Gut.

[18]  N. Ganne-Carrié,et al.  Liver stiffness measurement selects patients with cirrhosis at risk of bearing large oesophageal varices. , 2006, Journal of hepatology.

[19]  R. Soloway,et al.  Observer error and sampling variability tested in evaluation of hepatitis and cirrhosis by liver biopsy , 1971, The American Journal of Digestive Diseases.

[20]  V. de Lédinghen,et al.  Prospective comparison of transient elastography, Fibrotest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. , 2005, Gastroenterology.

[21]  T. Poynard,et al.  Biochemical markers of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C virus infection: a prospective study , 2001, The Lancet.

[22]  B. V. Van Beers,et al.  Liver fibrosis: non‐invasive assessment with MR elastography , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[23]  G. Leandro,et al.  Impact of liver biopsy size on histological evaluation of chronic viral hepatitis: the smaller the sample, the milder the disease. , 2003, Journal of hepatology.

[24]  Christos Christidis,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis by measurement of stiffness in patients with chronic hepatitis C , 2005, Hepatology.

[25]  E. Brunt,et al.  Grading and staging the histopathological lesions of chronic hepatitis: The Knodell histology activity index and beyond , 2000, Hepatology.

[26]  A. Memon,et al.  Sampling Variability on Percutaneous Liver Biopsy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection , 2003, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[27]  P. Bedossa,et al.  Appropriateness of liver biopsy. , 2000, Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie.

[28]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  Viscoelastic shear properties of in vivo breast lesions measured by MR elastography. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[29]  M Fink,et al.  Imaging anisotropic and viscous properties of breast tissue by magnetic resonance‐elastography , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  M. Ziol,et al.  Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[31]  M. Pirisi,et al.  Value of two noninvasive methods to detect progression of fibrosis among HCV carriers with normal aminotransferases , 2005, Hepatology.

[32]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C , 2003, Hepatology.

[33]  D. Rockey Antifibrotic therapy in chronic liver disease. , 2005, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[34]  L. Serfaty,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of hyaluronan and type III procollagen amino-terminal peptide serum assays as markers of liver fibrosis in chronic viral hepatitis C evaluated by ROC curve analysis. , 1996, Clinical chemistry.

[35]  S. Friedman,et al.  Liver fibrosis -- from bench to bedside. , 2003, Journal of hepatology.

[36]  L. Seeff,et al.  Aasld Practice Guideline Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment of Hepatitis C , 2003 .

[37]  M. Torbenson,et al.  Progression of liver fibrosis among injection drug users with chronic hepatitis C , 2006, Hepatology.

[38]  V. Paradis,et al.  Sampling variability of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C , 2003, Hepatology.

[39]  J. Bruix,et al.  Management of hepatocellular carcinoma , 2005, Hepatology.

[40]  J. F. Greenleaf,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography: Non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[41]  Isamu Ohashi,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements with diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of hepatic fibrosis , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.