Metal hypersensitivity testing in patients undergoing joint replacement: a systematic review.

We report a systematic review and meta-analysis of the peer-reviewed literature focusing on metal sensitivity testing in patients undergoing total joint replacement (TJR). Our purpose was to assess the risk of developing metal hypersensitivity post-operatively and its relationship with outcome and to investigate the advantages of performing hypersensitivity testing. We undertook a comprehensive search of the citations quoted in PubMed and EMBASE: 22 articles (comprising 3634 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The frequency of positive tests increased after TJR, especially in patients with implant failure or a metal-on-metal coupling. The probability of developing a metal allergy was higher post-operatively (odds ratio (OR) 1.52 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06 to 2.31)), and the risk was further increased when failed implants were compared with stable TJRs (OR 2.76 (95% CI 1.14 to 6.70)). Hypersensitivity testing was not able to discriminate between stable and failed TJRs, as its predictive value was not statistically proven. However, it is generally thought that hypersensitivity testing should be performed in patients with a history of metal allergy and in failed TJRs, especially with metal-on-metal implants and when the cause of the loosening is doubtful.

[1]  G. Altomare,et al.  Metal sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implants: a prospective study , 2011, Contact dermatitis.

[2]  James S. Taylor,et al.  Pragmatic approach to the clinical work‐up of patients with putative allergic disease to metallic orthopaedic implants before and after surgery , 2011, The British journal of dermatology.

[3]  Edward Ebramzadeh,et al.  Histological Features of Pseudotumor-like Tissues From Metal-on-Metal Hips , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  H. Gill,et al.  Lymphocyte proliferation responses in patients with pseudotumors following metal‐on‐metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  M. Bruze,et al.  Hypersensitivity reactions from metallic implants: a future challenge that needs to be addressed , 2010, The British journal of dermatology.

[6]  L. Filgueira,et al.  Metal is not inert: role of metal ions released by biocorrosion in aseptic loosening--current concepts. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[7]  F. Nestle,et al.  Increased metal allergy in patients with failed metal‐on‐metal hip arthroplasty and peri‐implant T‐lymphocytic inflammation , 2009, Allergy.

[8]  M. Thomsen,et al.  Implantatallergieregister – ein erster Erfahrungsbericht , 2009, Der Orthopäde.

[9]  D. Tigani,et al.  Sensitivity to implant materials in patients with total knee arthroplasties. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[10]  S. Goodman.  Wear particles, periprosthetic osteolysis and the immune system. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[11]  C. Case,et al.  Orthopaedic metals and their potential toxicity in the arthroplasty patient: A review of current knowledge and future strategies. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  G. Holt,et al.  The biology of aseptic osteolysis. , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Loosening and osteolysis associated with metal-on-metal bearings: A local effect of metal hypersensitivity? , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  N. Baldini,et al.  Sensitivity to implant materials in patients undergoing total hip replacement. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[16]  C. A. Jones,et al.  Total joint arthroplasties: current concepts of patient outcomes after surgery. , 2005, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[17]  T. Glant,et al.  Lymphocyte responses in patients with total hip arthroplasty , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  V. Bykerk,et al.  Consensus Statement , 2004, Pediatric Clinical Practice Guidelines & Policies.

[19]  D. Gawkrodger,et al.  Metal sensitivities and orthopaedic implants revisited: the potential for metal allergy with the new metal‐on‐metal joint prostheses , 2003, The British journal of dermatology.

[20]  P. Coenraads,et al.  Evidence‐based diagnosis in patch testing , 2003, Contact dermatitis.

[21]  N. Athanasou,et al.  Two distinct cellular mechanisms of osteoclast formation and bone resorption in periprosthetic osteolysis , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[22]  G. Riet,et al.  Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  Jonathan J Deeks,et al.  Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. , 2001, BMJ.

[24]  P. Benya,et al.  Characteristics of degeneration in an unstable knee with a coronal surface step-off. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[25]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Metal sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implants. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  G. Ciapetti,et al.  Expression of the CD69 activation antigen on lymphocytes of patients with hip prosthesis. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[27]  A. Menter.  Pharmacokinetics and safety of tazarotene. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[28]  D. Gawkrodger,et al.  Contact sensitivity to nickel and other metals in jewelry reactors. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[29]  G. Ciapetti,et al.  The effects of metal corrosion debris on immune system cells. , 1998, La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento.

[30]  Stanley A. Brown,et al.  Distribution of cobalt chromium wear and corrosion products and biologic reactions. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  J. Bellón,et al.  Similarity in behavior of polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) prostheses implanted into different interfaces. , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[32]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[33]  A. H. Waterman,et al.  Allergy in hip arthroplasty , 1985, Contact dermatitis.

[34]  G. Rooker,et al.  Metal sensitivity in patients undergoing hip replacement. A prospective study. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[35]  P. Zilko,et al.  Metal sensitivity causing loosened joint prostheses. , 1980, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[36]  S. A. Brown,et al.  Metal allergy and the surgical patient. , 1980, American journal of surgery.

[37]  B. Magnusson,et al.  Metal sensitivity in patients with metal-to-plastic total hip arthroplasties. , 1980, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[38]  M. Snaith,et al.  Metal sensitivity in patients with a hinge arthroplasty of the knee. , 1978, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[39]  J. Nater,et al.  Metal sensitivity before and after total hip arthroplasty. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[40]  D. Munro-Ashman,et al.  Rejection of metal to metal prosthesis and skin sensitivity to cobalt , 1976, Contact dermatitis.

[41]  J. Brostoff,et al.  Metal sensitivity in patients with joint replacement arthroplasties. , 1975, British medical journal.

[42]  J. Scales,et al.  Incidence of metal sensitivity in patients with total joint replacements. , 1975, British medical journal.

[43]  E. M. Evans,et al.  Metal sensitivity as a cause of bone necrosis and loosening of the prosthesis in total joint replacement. , 1974, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[44]  J. Scales,et al.  Concentration of Wear Products in Hair, Blood, and Urine after Total Hip Replacement , 1973, British medical journal.

[45]  T J Joyce,et al.  Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: A consequence of excess wear. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[46]  J. Thyssen,et al.  A case-control study , 2009 .

[47]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Biologic effects of implant debris. , 2009, Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases.

[48]  P. Campbell,et al.  An unusual lymphocytic perivascular infiltration in tissues around contemporary metal-on-metal joint replacements. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[49]  C. Lohmann,et al.  Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[50]  N. Baldini,et al.  Ion release in patients with metal-on-metal hip bearings in total joint replacement: a comparison with metal-on-polyethylene bearings. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[51]  V. Milavec-Puretić,et al.  Sensitivity to metals in 40 patients with failed hip endoprosthesis , 1998, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[52]  L. Török,et al.  Investigation into the development of allergy to metal in recipients of implanted hip prostheses: a prospective study , 1995 .

[53]  L. Parrini,et al.  Allergy to components of total hip arthroplasty before and after surgery. , 1992, Italian journal of orthopaedics and traumatology.

[54]  M. Freeman,et al.  Sensitivity to titanium. A cause of implant failure? , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[55]  J. Galante,et al.  Metallosis associated with a stable titanium-alloy femoral component in total hip replacement. A case report. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.