An Evaluation of Students’ Practical Intelligence and Ability to Diagnose Equipment Faults

Abstract Acquiring practical intelligence play an important role in laboratory work and it occurs when the students are performing tasks the laboratory. Nonetheless, practical intelligence has not yet been assessed or measured. Furthermore, since engineering practice also relies on substantial practical intelligence, it would be useful to study the extent to which students acquire this. The aim of this research is to find ways to measure changes in practical intelligence in order to assess informal learning in engineering laboratory classes. We would also like to test the relationship between practical intelligence acquired in laboratory classes with the ability to diagnose simple experiment faults in laboratory arrangements. A methodology of evaluating practical intelligence and assessment of faults diagnosis tasks are described and the results of this study are discussed.

[1]  Rolf Isermann,et al.  Fault diagnosis of machines via parameter estimation and knowledge processing - Tutorial paper , 1991, Autom..

[2]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge. , 1985 .

[3]  M. Eraut.  Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. , 2000, The British journal of educational psychology.

[4]  Karin Garmer,et al.  A hand-ergonomics training kit: development and evaluation of a package to support improved awareness and critical thinking. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  M. Polanyi.  Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy , 1959 .

[6]  Cyrus C. M. Mody.  The Sounds of Science: Listening to Laboratory Practice , 2005 .

[7]  Burford J Furman,et al.  Asynchronous Hands-On Experiments for Mechatronics Education , 2002 .

[8]  Scott D. Johnson.  Understanding Troubleshooting Styles To Improve Training Methods. , 1995 .

[9]  William B. Rouse,et al.  Review and Evaluation of Empirical Research in Troubleshooting , 1985 .

[10]  Randall T. MacPherson.  Factors Affecting Technological Trouble Shooting Skills. , 1998 .

[11]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Roles of Recognition Processes and Look-Ahead Search in Time-Constrained Expert Problem Solving: Evidence From Grand-Master-Level Chess , 1996 .

[12]  László Monostori.  New trends in machine tool monitoring and diagnostics , 1988 .

[13]  James Trevelyan,et al.  A Framework For Understanding Engineering Practice , 2008 .

[14]  Anit Somech,et al.  Tacit Knowledge in Academia: Its Effects on Student Learning and Achievement , 1999 .

[15]  Wendy M. Williams,et al.  Testing common sense. , 1995 .

[16]  T. J. Watson.  The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education , 2005 .

[17]  James Trevelyan,et al.  Experience in laboratory and the ability to diagnose equipment faults , 2007 .

[18]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  Capturing Technological Opportunity Via Japan's Star Scientists: Evidence from Japanese Firms' Biotech Patents and Products , 1998 .

[19]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  A model for evaluating the effectiveness of remote engineering laboratories and simulations in education , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[20]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Tacit Knowledge, Practical Intelligence, General Mental Ability, and Job Knowledge , 1993 .

[21]  D. Halpern.  Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking , 1995 .

[22]  Jeffrey W. Flesher,et al.  An Exploration of Technical Troubleshooting Expertise in Design, Manufacturing, and Repair Contexts. , 1993 .

[23]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Practical Intelligence for Success in School. , 1990 .

[24]  Michael E. Gorman,et al.  Types of Knowledge and Their Roles in Technology Transfer , 2002 .

[25]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  In the Backrooms of Science , 1994 .

[26]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Finding Students Who Are Wise, Practical, and Creative. , 2007 .

[27]  Nancy H. Leonard,et al.  Tacit Knowledge in Academia: A Proposed Model and Measurement Scale , 2005, The Journal of psychology.

[28]  Nauman Aslam,et al.  A web-based remote interactive laboratory for Internetworking education , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[29]  James Trevelyan,et al.  Can practical intelligence from a laboratory experience be measured , 2008 .

[30]  G. Gibbs.  Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods , 1988 .

[31]  Andrew Nafalski,et al.  Remote laboratories versus virtual and real laboratories , 2003, 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003..

[32]  Camilla Østerberg Rump,et al.  Getting it right: conceptual development from student to experienced engineer , 2007 .

[33]  Juan C. Lucena,et al.  Globalization and organizational change: engineers’ experiences and their implications for engineering education , 2006 .

[34]  James Trevelyan,et al.  Technical Coordination in Engineering Practice , 2007 .

[35]  N. J Brown,et al.  Mechatronics “a graduate perspective” , 2002 .

[36]  Malcolm James Ree,et al.  Intelligence Is the Best Predictor of Job Performance , 1992 .

[37]  Scott D. Johnson.  A Description of Expert and Novice Performance Differences on Technical Troubleshooting Tasks. , 1989 .

[38]  R. Sternberg,et al.  The g-ocentric View of Intelligence and Job Performance Is Wrong , 1993 .

[39]  Martyn Hill,et al.  An evaluation of the student response to electronics teaching using a CAL package , 1995 .

[40]  Richard K. Wagner,et al.  Tacit knowledge in everyday intelligent behavior. , 1987 .

[41]  Euan Lindsay,et al.  Effects of laboratory access modes upon learning outcomes , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[42]  L.R. Lattuca,et al.  Panel Session - Engineering Change: Findings from a Study of the Impact of EC2000 , 2006, Proceedings. Frontiers in Education. 36th Annual Conference.