Nanofiltration of a German groundwater of high hardness and NOM content: performance and costs

Nanofiltration of conventionally pretreated groundwater with elevated hardness and content of NOM (Ca2+: 115 mg/L; Mg2+: 12 mg/L; DOC = 2.9 mg/L) was carried out in a German water treatment plant of the public works of Mainz. For the investigated water the employed membrane (NF200B, Filmtec/DOW) showed almost complete rejection (>95%) of NOM, determined by measuring DOC, UVA (254 nm) and AOX- and THM-formation potential. Due to the high concentration of SO42− and presumably due to complexation of Ca2+ with humic substances the rejection of Ca2+ and Mg2+ was unexpectedly high (>74% and >86%, respectively) compared to a pure CaCl2 solution (R(CaCl2) <45%). Within an operation period of 4 weeks no significant fouling occurred (flux decline <2%). This was mainly due to the pre-treatment of the raw water (deferrization, demanganization, rapid sand filtration). The operating costs for a nanofiltration plant were calculated to about € 0.23/m3 at a permeate output of 20,000 m3/d which means an increase of the price for drinking water approximately 9%. By blending the permeate and the conventionally treated water at a ratio to yield a DOC concentration in the blend of 1 mg/L, the additional costs for nanofiltration would come to € 0.11/m3.

[1]  Jaeweon Cho,et al.  Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: factors and mechanisms affecting rejection and flux decline with charged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane , 2000 .

[2]  Robert A. Bergman,et al.  Cost of membrane softening in Florida , 1996 .

[3]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  Cost estimates for membrane filtration and conventional treatment , 1994 .

[4]  R. Scott Summers,et al.  Evaluating NF for DBP control with the RBSMT , 1995 .

[5]  P. Swart,et al.  Humic membrane foulants in natural brown water: characterization and removal , 1998 .

[6]  Gilbert Galjaard,et al.  Monitoring particulate fouling in membrane systems , 1998 .

[7]  F. Digiano,et al.  Influence of NOM composition on nanofiltration , 1996 .

[8]  G. Abbt-Braun,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A PREDICTIVE MODEL FOR CALCULATION OF MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF HUMIC SUBSTANCES , 1998 .

[9]  C. R. Reiss,et al.  Surface water treatment using nanofiltration—pilot testing results and design considerations , 1999 .

[10]  H. Ruiz,et al.  A pilot study on groundwater natural organics removal by low-pressure membranes , 1995 .

[11]  J. O'Donnell,et al.  Supplying high quality drinking water to remote communities in Scotland , 1998 .

[12]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes , 1997 .

[13]  David M. Nickerson,et al.  NF performance at full and pilot scale , 1999 .

[14]  Patrick MacCarthy,et al.  Aquatic Humic Substances: Influence on Fate and Treatment of Pollutants , 1988 .

[15]  J. Rook.  Formation of Haloforms during Chlorination of natural Waters , 1974 .

[16]  Claire Ventresque,et al.  An outstanding feat of modern technology: the Mery-sur-Oise nanofiltration Treatment plant (340,000 m3/d) , 2000 .

[17]  G. Amy,et al.  Seasonal variations of nanofiltration (NF) foulants: identification and control , 2000 .

[18]  D. Grasso,et al.  STRUCTURAL AND BEHAVIORAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A COMMERCIAL HUMIC ACID AND NATURAL DISSOLVED AQUATIC ORGANIC MATTER , 1990 .

[19]  T. Speth,et al.  Nanofiltration Foulants from a Treated Surface Water , 1998 .

[20]  Francis A. DiGiano,et al.  NOM Accumulation at NF Membrane Surface: Impact of Chemistry and Shear , 1998 .

[21]  P. Lipp,et al.  Nanofiltration in Combination with Limestone Filtration for Treating a Soft Spring Water Containing High Amounts of Humic Substances , 1996 .

[22]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Effect of humic substances and anionic surfactants on the surface charge and performance of reverse osmosis membranes , 1998 .

[23]  Samer Adham,et al.  Characteristics and costs of MF and UF plants , 1996 .

[24]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  Cost Modeling and Estimation of Crossflow Membrane Filtration Processes , 2000 .

[25]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  Cost Model for Low-Pressure Membrane Filtration , 1993 .

[26]  D. Welch,et al.  Nanofiltration for colour removal - 8 years' operational experience in Scotland , 2001 .

[27]  J. J. Morgan,et al.  Aquatic Chemistry: Chemical Equilibria and Rates in Natural Waters , 1970 .

[28]  M. Clark,et al.  Adsorption of aquatic humic substances on hydrophobic ultrafiltration membranes , 1994 .

[29]  Andrea I. Schäfer,et al.  Nanofiltration of Natural Organic Matter: Removal, Fouling and the Influence of Multivalent Ions , 1998 .

[30]  A. Fane,et al.  Fouling effects on rejection in the membrane filtration of natural waters , 2000 .

[31]  Zeyad S. Tarawneh,et al.  Modified Fouling Indexultrafiltration to compare pretreatment processes of reverse osmosis feedwater , 2000 .

[32]  B. Ericsson,et al.  Nanofiltration of highly colored raw water for drinking water production , 1997 .

[33]  F. Frimmel,et al.  Specific interactions of organic substances in size-exclusion chromatography , 2000 .

[34]  F. Frimmel,et al.  Fractionation of natural organic matter by size exclusion chromatography: Properties and stability of fractions , 2000 .