Measuring conservation program best management practice implementation and maintenance at the watershed scale

There is growing interest in evaluating the impacts at the watershed scale of agricultural best management practices (BMPs) designed to improve water quality. Many approaches to impact assessment require detailed information about actual BMP use by farmers and landowners in a watershed. This paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of using formal USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service records of conservation program participation as an indicator of spatial and temporal patterns of BMP implementation and maintenance. Field interviews with conservation program participants revealed potential limitations with official records regarding (1) documentation of the incidence of successful BMP implementation, (2) the nature of the BMPs that were implemented, (3) accurate measurement of the timing and location of BMP implementations, and (4) information about the long-term use and maintenance of implemented BMPs. The results suggest that official records should be field-verified before being used as indicators of BMP use. The findings also point to a larger need for development of more robust and accurate systems for tracking BMP implementation and maintenance over periods of time.

[1]  Ray B. Bryant,et al.  Cannonsville Reservoir and Town Brook watersheds: Documenting conservation efforts to protect New York City's drinking water , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[2]  D. C. Flanagan,et al.  Application of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool and Annualized Agricultural Non-Point Source models in the St. Joseph River watershed , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[3]  W. J. Gburek,et al.  Use of the SWAT Model to Quantify Water Quality Effects of Agricultural BMPs at the Farm-Scale Level , 2008 .

[4]  Megan W. Lang,et al.  Water quality and conservation practice effects in the Choptank River watershed , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[5]  Mark D. Tomer,et al.  Assessment of the Iowa River's South Fork watershed: Part 2. Conservation practices , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[6]  Greg Lindsey,et al.  Maintenance of stormwater BMPs in four Maryland counties: A status report , 1992 .

[7]  Ronald L. Bingner,et al.  Conservation practices and gully erosion contributions in the Topashaw Canal watershed , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[8]  David D. Bosch,et al.  Long-term stream chemistry trends in the southern Georgia Little River Experimental Watershed , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[9]  H. L. Batten,et al.  Little River Experimental Watershed, Tifton, Georgia, United States: A historical geographic database of conservation practice implementation , 2007 .

[10]  Patrick J. Starks,et al.  Environmental effects of agricultural conservation: A framework for research in two watersheds in Oklahoma's Upper Washita River Basin , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[11]  D. Karlen.  A new paradigm for natural resources research: The Conservation Effects Assessment Project , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[12]  Joseph R. Makuch,et al.  The first five years of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[13]  D. Lambert,et al.  The value of integrated CEAP-ARMS survey data in conservation program analysis , 2007 .

[14]  James A. Larson,et al.  Adoption and Abandonment of Precision Soil Sampling in Cotton Production , 2008 .

[15]  Zachary M Easton,et al.  Modeling watershed-scale effectiveness of agricultural best management practices to reduce phosphorus loading. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[16]  D. Bosch,et al.  Little River Experimental Watershed, Tifton, Georgia, United States: A geographic database , 2007 .

[17]  R. Bailey,et al.  Effectiveness of best management practices in improving stream ecosystem quality , 2007, Hydrobiologia.

[18]  J. G. Arnold,et al.  MODELING A SMALL, NORTHEASTERN WATERSHED WITH DETAILED, FIELD-LEVEL DATA , 2008 .

[19]  Saied Mostaghimi,et al.  ANIMALWASTE BMP IMPACTS ON SEDIMENT AND NUTRIENT LOSSES IN RUNOFF FROM THE OWL RUN WATERSHED , 2000 .

[20]  Douglas Jackson-Smith,et al.  The Dynamics of Agricultural Biotechnology Adoption: Lessons from series rBST Use in Wisconsin, 1994–2001 , 2004 .

[21]  Bernard A. Engel,et al.  EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 20 YEARS AFTER INSTALLATION: BLACK CREEK WATERSHED, INDIANA , 2004 .

[22]  Zachary M Easton,et al.  Combined monitoring and modeling indicate the most effective agricultural best management practices. , 2008, Journal of environmental quality.

[23]  Bernard A. Engel,et al.  Evaluation of Nutrient Management Plans Using an Integrated Modeling Approach , 2007 .

[24]  A. R. Dedrick,et al.  The length we go: Measuring environmental benefits of conservation practices , 2004 .

[25]  S. Mooney,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of actions to mitigate nutrient loss from agriculture: a review of methods. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[26]  J. Arnold,et al.  Suitability of SWAT for the Conservation Effects Assessment Project: Comparison on USDA Agricultural Research Service Watersheds , 2007 .

[27]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[28]  C. Cox,et al.  Building blocks to effectively assessing the environmental benefits of conservation practices , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[29]  Douglas Jackson-Smith,et al.  The Dynamics Of Agricultural Biotechnology Adoption: Lessons From Rbst Use In Wisconsin, 1994-2001 , 2002 .

[30]  Mazdak Arabi,et al.  Modeling long-term water quality impact of structural BMPs , 2006 .