Modifications to the Aesop's Fable Paradigm Change New Caledonian Crow Performances

While humans are able to understand much about causality, it is unclear to what extent non-human animals can do the same. The Aesop's Fable paradigm requires an animal to drop stones into a water-filled tube to bring a floating food reward within reach. Rook, Eurasian jay, and New Caledonian crow performances are similar to those of children under seven years of age when solving this task. However, we know very little about the cognition underpinning these birds' performances. Here, we address several limitations of previous Aesop's Fable studies to gain insight into the causal cognition of New Caledonian crows. Our results provide the first evidence that any non-human animal can solve the U-tube task and can discriminate between water-filled tubes of different volumes. However, our results do not provide support for the hypothesis that these crows can infer the presence of a hidden causal mechanism. They also call into question previous object-discrimination performances. The methodologies outlined here should allow for more powerful comparisons between humans and other animal species and thus help us to determine which aspects of causal cognition are distinct to humans.

[1]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[2]  Russell D. Gray,et al.  Animal Cognition: Aesop's Fable Flies from Fiction to Fact , 2009, Current Biology.

[3]  N. Clayton,et al.  How Do Children Solve Aesop's Fable? , 2012, PloS one.

[4]  S. Gelman,et al.  Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity In Cognition And Culture , 1994 .

[5]  J. Woodward,et al.  Just do it? Investigating the gap between prediction and action in toddlers’ causal inferences , 2010, Cognition.

[6]  D. Povinelli.  Folk physics for apes : the chimpanzee's theory of how the world works , 2003 .

[7]  N. Emery,et al.  Investigating Physical Cognition in Rooks, Corvus frugilegus , 2006, Current Biology.

[8]  Kathleen M. Silva,et al.  Humans’ folk physics is sensitive to physical connection and contact between a tool and reward , 2008, Behavioural Processes.

[9]  E. Visalberghi,et al.  Lack of comprehension of cause-effect relations in tool-using capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). , 1994, Journal of comparative psychology.

[10]  Derek C. Penn,et al.  Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  J. Call,et al.  Chimpanzees solve the trap problem when the confound of tool-use is removed. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[12]  Nicola S. Clayton,et al.  Tool-use and instrumental learning in the Eurasian jay (Garrulus glandarius) , 2011, Animal Cognition.

[13]  Nicola S. Clayton,et al.  New Caledonian Crows Learn the Functional Properties of Novel Tool Types , 2011, PloS one.

[14]  Alex H. Taylor,et al.  An Investigation into the Cognition Behind Spontaneous String Pulling in New Caledonian Crows , 2010, PloS one.

[15]  Christopher D. Bird,et al.  Rooks Use Stones to Raise the Water Level to Reach a Floating Worm , 2009, Current Biology.

[16]  A. H. Taylor,et al.  Do New Caledonian crows solve physical problems through causal reasoning? , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  G. Hunt.  Manufacture and use of hook-tools by New Caledonian crows , 1996, Nature.

[18]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[19]  A. Gopnik,et al.  The theory theory. , 1994 .

[20]  Kathleen M. Silva,et al.  Methodological-conceptual problems in the study of chimpanzees’ folk physics: How studies with adult humans can help , 2005, Learning & behavior.

[21]  Jackie Chappell,et al.  Morphology and sexual dimorphism of the New Caledonian crow Corvus moneduloides, with notes on its behaviour and ecology , 2004 .

[22]  K. Barton.  MuMIn : multi-model inference, R package version 0.12.0 , 2009 .

[23]  Russell D. Gray,et al.  New Caledonian crows reason about hidden causal agents , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Alex H. Taylor,et al.  Using the Aesop's Fable Paradigm to Investigate Causal Understanding of Water Displacement by New Caledonian Crows , 2014, PloS one.

[25]  Evidence from convergent evolution and causal reasoning suggests that conclusions on human uniqueness may be premature , 2012, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[26]  Nicholas J. Mulcahy,et al.  How great apes perform on a modified trap-tube task , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[27]  Derek C. Penn,et al.  Causal cognition in human and nonhuman animals: a comparative, critical review. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[28]  J. Call,et al.  Tubes, tables and traps: great apes solve two functionally equivalent trap tasks but show no evidence of transfer across tasks , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[29]  J. Call,et al.  The performance of bonobos (Pan paniscus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) in two versions of an object-choice task. , 2009, Journal of comparative psychology.