Vibrotactile speech tracking support: cognitive prerequisites.

Fourteen postlingually hearing-impaired participants took part in an intervention study on the potential benefit of three types of tactile aids (i.e., the Tactilator, Minivib 3, and the Tactaid 7). Although training by means of computerized tracking had substantial effects on speech tracking rate, no differential effects of type of aid emerged. However, a cognitive test battery revealed that training efficacy is directly dependent on the cognitive prerequisites of the individual speechreader. The speed with which an individual can make phonological judgments (i.e., rhyme judgments) and visual word decoding from lipreading proved to be critical cognitive skills. We conclude that these skills must be further assessed and taken into account when rehabilitation/training programs are launched.

[1]  J. Rönnberg,et al.  Visual speech processing: word-decoding and word-discrimination related to sentence-based speechreading and hearing-impairment. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[2]  G. Clark,et al.  A comparison of two training strategies for speech recognition with an electrotactile speech processor. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  J. Rönnberg,et al.  Information-processing skill and speech-reading. , 1989, British journal of audiology.

[4]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  Components of fluent reading , 1985 .

[5]  Geoff Plant,et al.  A single-transducer vibrotactile aid to lipreading , 1987, Speech Commun..

[6]  M E Demorest,et al.  Lipreading sentences with vibrotactile vocoders: performance of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J. Rönnberg,et al.  The relationship between verbal ability and sentence-based speechreading. , 1992, Scandinavian audiology.

[8]  J. Rönnberg.  Cognitive characteristics of skilled tactiling: The case of GS , 1993 .

[9]  Jerker Rönnberg.  What makes a skilled speechreader , 1995 .

[10]  Karl-Erik Spens,et al.  Profound deafness and speech communication , 1995 .

[11]  Sture Allén,et al.  Nusvensk frekvensordbok baserad på tidningstext = Frequency Dictionary of Present-Day Swedish based on newspaper material , 1970 .

[12]  Janet M. Weisenberger,et al.  Comparison of two single‐channel vibrotactile aids for the hearing impaired , 1986 .

[13]  M. J. Osberger,et al.  Speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  P J Blamey,et al.  Tactile-auditory speech perception by unimodally and bimodally trained normal-hearing subjects. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[15]  J. Rönnberg,et al.  Audio-visual speechreading in a group of hearing aid users. The effects of onset age, handicap age, and degree of hearing loss. , 1996, Scandinavian audiology.

[16]  P L Brooks,et al.  Continuing evaluation of the Queen's University tactile vocoder. I: Identification of open set words. , 1986, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[17]  J M Weisenberger,et al.  The role of tactile aids in providing information about acoustic stimuli. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  L. Kozma-Spytek,et al.  Evaluating tactile aids for speech perception and production by hearing-impaired adults and children. , 1991, The American journal of otology.

[19]  A E Carney,et al.  Vibrotactile perception of suprasegmental features of speech: a comparison of single-channel and multichannel instruments. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Jerker Rönnberg,et al.  Cognitive and communicative function : The effects of chronological age and "handicap age" , 1990 .

[21]  D. Oller,et al.  Multisensory narrative tracking by a profoundly deaf subject using an electrocutaneous vocoder and a vibrotactile aid. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[22]  P K Kuhl,et al.  Investigating the MESA (multipoint electrotactile speech aid): the transmission of connected discourse. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  F. Musiek,et al.  SN10 auditory evoked potential revisited. , 1991, The American journal of otology.

[24]  B L Scott,et al.  A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speech. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  J Rönnberg,et al.  Tactiling: a usable support system for speechreading? , 1992, British journal of audiology.

[26]  J Rönnberg,et al.  Internal speech functioning and speechreading in deafened and normal hearing adults. , 1994, Scandinavian audiology.

[27]  A E Carney,et al.  Speech perception with a single-channel cochlear implant: a comparison with a single-channel tactile device. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[28]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Speechreading enhancement: a comparison of spatial-tactile display of voice fundamental frequency (F0) with auditory F0. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  J M Weisenberger,et al.  Relative performance of single-channel and multichannel tactile aids for speech perception. , 1991, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[30]  L. Bernstein,et al.  Single-channel vibrotactile supplements to visual perception of intonation and stress. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  P L Brooks,et al.  Continuing evaluation of the Queen's University tactile vocoder II: Identification of open set sentences and tracking narrative. , 1986, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[32]  S Arlinger,et al.  Verbal information-processing capabilities and cochlear implants: implications for preoperative predictors of speech understanding. , 1996, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[33]  B Lyxell.  Skilled speechreading: a single-case study. , 1994, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[34]  Q. Summerfield.  Some preliminaries to a comprehensive account of audio-visual speech perception. , 1987 .

[35]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Spatial, tactile presentation of voice fundamental frequency as a supplement to lipreading: results of extended training with a single subject. , 1988, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[36]  J M Weisenberger,et al.  Comparative Effectiveness of Correction Strategies in Connected Discourse Tracking , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[37]  A E Carney,et al.  Vibrotactile perception of segmental features of speech: a comparison of single-channel and multichannel instruments. , 1988, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[38]  P. Ackerman.  Predicting individual differences in complex skill acquisition: dynamics of ability determinants. , 1992, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  P L Brooks,et al.  Evaluation of a tactile vocoder for work recognition. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.