Microfabricated porous silicon backbone for stable neural interfaces

Abstract To fabricate a porous silicon–polymer hybrid neural electrode with the capability of adaptive stiffness, a critical microfabrication process was developed and the porous silicon (PSi) backbone of the neural electrode was prepared for mass production on 8-in. wafers via microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technologies. Surface characteristics of the microfabricated PSi backbone were determined using scanning electronmicroscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and Fourier transform infrared spectrum (FTIR). Moreover, acute cytotoxicity of the PSi backbone was assessed by seeding a mouse fibroblast cell line (L929) on the surface. After 2 days of culture, morphology of cells was observed using a fluorescence microscope, and relative cell viability was also used to quantitatively evaluate the cytotoxicity. Compared to Si samples, relative cell attachment of PSi samples was 192.77±27.19% due to the nano featured surface providing more suitable sites for cell adhesion, indicating that the microfabricated PSi backbone was cytocompatible.

[1]  Min-Yuan Cheng,et al.  Implantable Polyimide Cable for Multichannel High-Data-Rate Neural Recording Microsystems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Jens Schouenborg,et al.  Porous silicon as a potential electrode material in a nerve repair setting: Tissue reactions. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[3]  Gang Xu,et al.  Preparation and photoluminescence of nanocrystalline Si-rich silicon oxide films by PECVD , 2007 .

[4]  M. Edirisinghe,et al.  Porosity and Strength of Silicon Carbide Foams Prepared Using Preceramic Polymers , 2002 .

[5]  A. Wee,et al.  Surface and optical analyses of porous silicon membranes , 1994 .

[6]  T. Young,et al.  Study on the Si–Si Vibrational States of the Near Surface Region of Porous Silicon , 2000 .

[7]  Giuliano Iurilli,et al.  Flexible, all-polymer microelectrode arrays for the capture of cardiac and neuronal signals. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[8]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Cell–matrix adhesion , 2007, Journal of cellular physiology.

[9]  Yufeng Zheng,et al.  Corrosion behaviour and biocompatibility evaluation of low modulus Ti–16Nb shape memory alloy as potential biomaterial , 2009 .

[10]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Actions from thoughts , 2001, Nature.

[11]  Mohammad Reza Abidian,et al.  Multifunctional Nanobiomaterials for Neural Interfaces , 2009 .

[12]  Saida P. Khan,et al.  Biocompatibility assessment of next generation materials for brain implantable microelectrodes , 2011 .

[13]  E. Secret,et al.  Initial stem cell adhesion on porous silicon surface: molecular architecture of actin cytoskeleton and filopodial growth , 2014, Nanoscale Research Letters.

[14]  Jon A. Mukand,et al.  Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia , 2006, Nature.

[15]  P. Tresco,et al.  Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  D. Kipke,et al.  Neural probe design for reduced tissue encapsulation in CNS. , 2007, Biomaterials.