Correlation bundle statistics in fMRI data

Traditionally fMRI data analysis aims at identifying brain areas in which the amplitude of the BOLD signal responds to experimental stimulations. However, since the brain acts as a network, we would expect differential effects on network topology. Therefore, the target of statistical inference should not only be individual voxels or brain areas but rather network connections. Here we introduce a new approach to correlation-based statistics in fMRI. At the heart of our approach is the concept of correlation bundles as a functional analogy to anatomical fibre bundles. Statistical tests are applied to these bundles using large-scale inference methods such as FDR. We call this approach correlation bundle statistics (CBS). In contrast to previous correlation-based approaches to fMRI statistics, CBS does not require a presegmentation or smoothing of the data so that anatomical specificity is preserved. The result of a CBS analysis is not a set of voxels or brain regions but rather a set of correlation bundles that are found to be significantly affected by some experimental manipulation.

[1]  Korbinian Strimmer,et al.  A unified approach to false discovery rate estimation , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[2]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  Three-Dimensional Mean-Shift Edge Bundling for the Visualization of Functional Connectivity in the Brain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[3]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Network-based statistic: Identifying differences in brain networks , 2010, NeuroImage.

[4]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[5]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Multiplexed Echo Planar Imaging for Sub-Second Whole Brain FMRI and Fast Diffusion Imaging , 2010, PloS one.

[6]  B. Efron.  Size, power and false discovery rates , 2007, 0710.2245.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  False discovery rate revisited: FDR and topological inference using Gaussian random fields , 2009, NeuroImage.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[10]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[11]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Connectivity differences in brain networks , 2012, NeuroImage.

[12]  Noah D. Brenowitz,et al.  Whole-brain, time-locked activation with simple tasks revealed using massive averaging and model-free analysis , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Nelson J. Trujillo-Barreto,et al.  On the Fisher's Z transformation of correlation random fields , 2009 .

[14]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Applications of random field theory to functional connectivity , 1998, Human brain mapping.