Protection of the Internal Mammary Artery Pedicle with Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane

Abstract With increasing frequency, reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery is being performed in the setting of a patent internal mammary artery (IMA) graft. Injury to the IMA graft at reoperation can result in ischemic myocardial injury and cardiac arrest. This descriptive laboratory study examined use of a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane wrap to protect the IMA pedicle during sternal reentry. Six pigs (25–30 kg) underwent median sternotomy and takedown of left and right IMAs. Grafts were implanted in the epicardium by a modified Vineberg procedure. In each animal, one IMA was wrapped circumferentially with PTFE, while the contralateral bare IMA served as the control. Redo sternotomy was performed 3 months later. Severe adhesions between chest wall, myocardium, and bare IMA grafts were encountered in six of six animals. PTFE‐wrapped IMAs were easily identified by appearance and by palpation. There was no adherence between PTFE membranes and surrounding tissue, nor was there evidence of cellular infiltration, disruption, or contraction of the membrane. Most notably, PTFE membranes could not be cut or injured with the electrocautery, since they are electrical nonconductors. This study demonstrates that PTFE membrane: (1) is relatively inert and incites minimal surrounding tissue reaction; and (2) is impenetrable to electrocautery injury. Further studies are necessary to determine the impact of PTFE membrane on IMA graft patency and wound infection. PTFE membrane may prove clinically useful in protecting patent IMA pedicles during reoperative cardiac surgery.

[1]  J. González-Santos,et al.  Selective and adjustable pericardial flap to protect internal mammary artery grafts. , 1990, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  R. Vogel,et al.  Experience with the polytetrafluoroethylene surgical membrane for pericardial closure in operations for congenital cardiac defects. , 1989, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  S. Hoshino,et al.  Long-term results of the clinical use of an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene surgical membrane as a pericardial substitute. , 1988, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[4]  V. Ferraris,et al.  Pericardial substitutes: a survey. , 1988, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  G. Hollweg,et al.  Clinical Experience with Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Gore‐Tex® Surgical Membrane for Pericardial Closure: A Study of 110 Cases , 1988, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[6]  B. Berry,et al.  Protection and expanded use of the left internal mammary artery graft by pericardial flap technique. , 1988, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

[7]  G. Hollweg,et al.  Closure of the pericardium using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene GORE-TEX-Surgical Membrane: clinical experience. , 1987, The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon.

[8]  S. Mills Complications associated with the use of heterologous bovine pericardium for pericardial closure. , 1986, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[9]  C. Duran,et al.  Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene surgical membrane for pericardial closure. An experimental study. , 1985, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[10]  F. Loop,et al.  Long-term (5 to 12 years) serial studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts. , 1985, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[11]  S. Phillips,et al.  Inflammatory epicardial reaction to processed bovine pericardium: case report. , 1984, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[12]  F. Loop,et al.  Trends in selection and results of coronary artery reoperations. , 1983, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  B. Gersh,et al.  The morbidity and mortality of reoperation for coronary artery disease and analysis of late results with use of actuarial estimate of event-free interval. , 1983, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[14]  C. Duran,et al.  Clinical experience with glutaraldehyde-preserved heterologous pericardium for the closure of the pericardium after open heart surgery. , 1982, The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon.

[15]  A. Geha,et al.  Use of silicone rubber as a pericardial substitute to facilitate reoperation in cardiac surgery. , 1981, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[16]  C. Duran,et al.  Heterologous pericardium for the closure of pericardial defects. , 1978, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  F. Spencer,et al.  Use of autologous fascia lata as a pericardial substitute following open-heart surgery. , 1977, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[18]  T. J. Tarnay,et al.  Partial replacement of pericardium with dura substitute. , 1973, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[19]  J. Derrick,et al.  The prevention of pleural and pericardial adhesions with Silastic. , 1968, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[20]  M. K. Mazuji,et al.  SILICONIZED DACRON AS A PERICARDIAL PATCH. , 1963, Archives of surgery.