Geometric calibration for LiDAR-camera system fusing 3D-2D and 3D-3D point correspondences.

Calibrating the extrinsic parameters on a system of 3D Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) and the monocular camera is a challenging task, because accurate 3D-2D or 3D-3D point correspondences are hard to establish from the sparse LiDAR point clouds in the calibration procedure. In this paper, we propose a geometric calibration method for estimating the extrinsic parameters of the LiDAR-camera system. In this method, a novel combination of planar boards with chessboard patterns and auxiliary calibration objects are proposed. The planar chessboard provides 3D-2D and 3D-3D point correspondences. Auxiliary calibration objects provide extra constraints for stable calibration results. After that, a novel geometric optimization framework is proposed to utilize these point correspondences, thus leading calibration results robust to LiDAR sensor noise. Besides, we contribute an automatic approach to extract point clouds of calibration objects. In the experiments, our method has a superior performance over state-of-the-art calibration methods. Furthermore, we verify our method by computing depth map and improvements can also be found. These results demonstrate that our method performance on the LiDAR-camera system is applicable for future advanced visual applications.

[1]  Yuehui Song,et al.  Correction technology of a polarization lidar with a complex optical system. , 2016, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[2]  Bo Yang,et al.  On-orbit calibration approach for optical navigation camera in deep space exploration. , 2016, Optics express.

[3]  Xiang Peng,et al.  Structured light field 3D imaging. , 2016, Optics express.

[4]  Zhengyou Zhang,et al.  Camera calibration with one-dimensional objects , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  Zhiyong Pang,et al.  Super multi-view three-dimensional display technique for portable devices. , 2016, Optics express.

[6]  Kyungeun Cho,et al.  Calibration between Color Camera and 3D LIDAR Instruments with a Polygonal Planar Board , 2014, Sensors.

[7]  Zhengyou Zhang,et al.  A Flexible New Technique for Camera Calibration , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  Yaorong Ge,et al.  Surface-based 3D image registration using the iterative closest-point algorithm with a closest-point transform , 1996, Medical Imaging.

[9]  George Karypis,et al.  Empirical and Theoretical Comparisons of Selected Criterion Functions for Document Clustering , 2004, Machine Learning.

[10]  You Yang,et al.  Group geometric calibration and rectification for circular multi-camera imaging system. , 2018, Optics express.

[11]  Zhanyi Hu,et al.  Camera calibration with moving one-dimensional objects , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[12]  Fuqiang Zhou,et al.  Precise calibration of binocular vision system used for vision measurement. , 2014, Optics express.

[13]  Xiang Peng,et al.  Ray calibration and phase mapping for structured-light-field 3D reconstruction. , 2018, Optics express.

[14]  Dimitrios G. Kottas,et al.  3D LIDAR–camera intrinsic and extrinsic calibration: Identifiability and analytical least-squares-based initialization , 2012, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[15]  V. Lepetit,et al.  EPnP: An Accurate O(n) Solution to the PnP Problem , 2009, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[16]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Method for pan-tilt camera calibration using single control point. , 2015, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[17]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using orthonormal matrices , 1988 .