Theta motion: a paradoxical stimulus to explore higher order motion extraction

Apparent motion stimuli of increasing complexity have been applied to analyse the mechanisms underlying visual motion perception. In the present paper it is investigated how motion detectors respond to three classes of stimuli which are realized as random-dot kinematograms. (i) In the most conventional stimuli, Fourier motion, a group of dots is displaced coherently in a random-dot pattern. (ii) In drift-balanced motion stimuli a bar made of static random dots is shifted in front of another random-dot pattern. (iii) In the novel class of stimuli, theta motion, an object which is exclusively defined by dot motion into one direction, is moving itself into the opposite direction. It is shown in psychophysical experiments that human observers perceive the direction of object motion in all three classes of stimuli. Simple motion detectors, however, only extract the motion direction of the object in the case of Fourier stimuli, and in the case of drift-balanced stimuli, if a nonlinear preprocessing is assumed. Any of the model alternatives discussed so far just detects the moving dots but not the object in a theta-stimulus, as is illustrated by a combinatorial analysis using a simplified version of a motion detector of the correlation type, which operates on a discrete time scale and takes only discrete values. In order to account for the detection of theta-motion, a model consisting of two hierarchical layers of motion detectors is developed, and simulated for conditions as used in the psychophysical experiments. The perception of theta-motion and the two-layer model is discussed in relation to psychophysical data and theoretical considerations from the literature, to try to incorporate the proposed two-layer model into a general scheme of visual motion processing.

[1]  H. Barlow,et al.  The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit's retina. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  S. Ullman The interpretation of structure from motion , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[3]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[4]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Illusory motion in visual displays , 1984, Vision Research.

[6]  JM Zanker On the detectability of phi- and theta-motion , 1990 .

[7]  Johannes M. Zanker,et al.  On the development of motion perception in human infants , 1993 .

[8]  Shaul Hochstein,et al.  Size, flux and luminance effects in the apparent motion correspondence process , 1989, Vision Research.

[9]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Motion: the long and short of it. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[10]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Velocity step responses of the human gaze pursuit system. Experiments with sigma-movement , 1985, Vision Research.

[11]  E C Hildreth,et al.  Incremental rigidity scheme for recovering structure from motion: position-based versus velocity-based formulations. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[12]  B. Hassenstein,et al.  Systemtheoretische Analyse der Zeit-, Reihenfolgen- und Vorzeichenauswertung bei der Bewegungsperzeption des Rüsselkäfers Chlorophanus , 1956 .

[13]  J. van Santen,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  S. Anstis,et al.  Effects of Luminance and Contrast on Direction of Ambiguous Apparent Motion , 1985, Perception.

[15]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Visual figure–ground discrimination in the honeybee: the role of motion parallax at boundaries , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[16]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Deficits in speed discrimination following lesions of the lateral suprasylvian cortex in the cat , 1989, Visual Neuroscience.

[17]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Single visual neurons code opposing motion independent of direction. , 1983, Science.

[18]  John Wattam-Bell,et al.  The development of maximum displacement limits for discrimination of motion direction in infancy , 1992, Vision Research.

[19]  C. Baker,et al.  The basis of area and dot number effects in random dot motion perception , 1982, Vision Research.

[20]  D. Burr,et al.  Seeing objects in motion , 1986, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[21]  G. Sperling,et al.  Second-order motion perception: space/time separable mechanisms , 1989, [1989] Proceedings. Workshop on Visual Motion.

[22]  W C Gogel,et al.  The Perception of Relative Motion by Young Infants , 1978, Perception.

[23]  G. Johansson Visual motion perception. , 1975, Scientific American.

[24]  W. Newsome,et al.  A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT) , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  William A. Simpson,et al.  The use of different features by the matching process in short-range motion , 1990, Vision Research.

[26]  G Sperling,et al.  Two motion perception mechanisms revealed through distance-driven reversal of apparent motion. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Davida Y. Teller,et al.  Statistical properties of staircase estimates , 1970 .

[28]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Interattribute apparent motion , 1989, Vision Research.

[29]  Johannes M. Zanker,et al.  Parietal DC-shifts as correlates of motion perception , 1992 .

[30]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[31]  J. Dannemiller,et al.  The detection of slow stimulus movement in 2- to 5-month-olds. , 1989, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[32]  Johannes M. Zanker,et al.  Behavioural response of the fly to Fourier-, drift-balanced and paradox motion stimuli (Theta-motion) , 1991 .

[33]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Course Control in Insects , 1989 .

[34]  JM Zanker Effects of nonlinear preprocessing on the spatial limits of motion detection , 1991 .

[35]  D. Regan,et al.  Figure-ground segregation by motion contrast and by luminance contrast. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[36]  B. Julesz,et al.  Displacement limits, directional anisotropy and direction versus form discrimination in random-dot cinematograms , 1983, Vision Research.

[37]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Intact “biological motion” and “structure from motion” perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: A case study , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[38]  G. Sperling,et al.  Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[39]  Mary M. Conte,et al.  Motion mechanisms have only limited access to form information , 1990, Vision Research.

[40]  A Gorea,et al.  Motion processing by chromatic and achromatic visual pathways. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[41]  D. Regan Orientation discrimination for objects defined by relative motion and objects defined by luminance contrast , 1989, Vision Research.

[42]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Biological image motion processing: A review , 1985, Vision Research.

[43]  G. Sperling Three stages and two systems of visual processing. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[44]  G Curio,et al.  SIGMA‐MOVEMENT AND SIGMA‐NYSTAGMUS: A NEW TOOL TO INVESTIGATE THE GAZE‐PURSUIT SYSTEM AND VISUAL‐MOVEMENT PERCEPTION IN MAN AND MONKEY * , 1981, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[45]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system , 1961 .

[46]  C. Koch,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: from computational theory to neuronal mechanisms. , 1986, Annual review of neuroscience.

[47]  Á. Szél,et al.  Four cone types characterized by anti-visual pigment antibodies in the pigeon retina. , 1989, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[48]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  Visual course control in flies relies on neuronal computation of object and background motion , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[49]  J. Atkinson,et al.  Human visual development over the first 6 months of life. A review and a hypothesis. , 1984, Human neurobiology.

[50]  Donald M. MacKay,et al.  Visual Stability and Voluntary Eye Movements , 1973 .

[51]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex. , 1987, Annual review of neuroscience.

[52]  S. Anstis,et al.  Phi movement as a subtraction process. , 1970, Vision research.

[53]  A. Pantle,et al.  Apparent Movement of Successively Generated Subjective Figures , 1978, Perception.