SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams

Misperception of nonwords created by adjacent letter transpositions (TL anagrams) indicates that word recognition is based on an orthographic matching process that is tolerant of minor positional errors in the letter sequence. We report five experiments that investigate the extent to which the misperception of TL anagrams is influenced by orthographic and phonological properties of the letter string. The first two experiments demonstrate that in a lexical decision task with masked target displays, false positive responses are more likely for unpronounceable than for pronounceable TL items. In Experiment 3 this effect was observed in an identification task as a trade-off between lexical responses and correct identification. A fourth experiment provided additional evidence that these effects are mediated by phonological rather than orthographic processing. This interpretation was strengthened by a final experiment showing that dyslexic participants did not show the pronounceability effect in lexical decision. These results are interpreted in terms of inhibition of lexical responses to TL anagrams by incompatible phonological representations of the letter string.

[1]  D. O. Robinson,et al.  The role of bigram frequency in the perception of words and nonwords , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[2]  M. Masson Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[3]  Lynn E. Snyder,et al.  College students with dyslexia: persistent linguistic deficits and foreign language learning. , 2000, Dyslexia.

[4]  V. Standish Skilled Reading with Impaired Phonology: A Case Study , 1996 .

[5]  Shelley Miller-Shaul,et al.  The characteristics of young and adult dyslexics readers on reading and reading related cognitive tasks as compared to normal readers. , 2005, Dyslexia.

[6]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Effects of Phonological and Orthographic Neighbourhood Density Interact in Visual Word Recognition , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[7]  J. Grainger,et al.  Phonology and Orthography in Visual Word Recognition: Evidence from Masked Non-Word Priming , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. , 1994 .

[9]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[10]  G. C. Orden,et al.  Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  How to deal with "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. , 1999 .

[12]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[13]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[14]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Homographic entries in the internal lexicon , 1970 .

[15]  G. C. Orden A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading , 1987 .

[16]  M. Bruck Persistence of dyslexics' phonological awareness deficits. , 1992 .

[17]  Mark Yates,et al.  Phonological neighbors speed visual word processing: evidence from multiple tasks. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming , 1991 .

[19]  D. Shankweiler,et al.  Phonology and the Problems of Learning to Read and Write , 1985 .

[20]  Padraic Monaghan,et al.  Reading, sublexical units and scrambled words: Capturing the human data , 2004 .

[21]  Maggie Bruck,et al.  Component Spelling Skills of College Students with Childhood Diagnoses of Dyslexia , 1993 .

[22]  S. Lupker,et al.  Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ , 2004 .

[23]  M T Turvey,et al.  Phonological codes are early sources of constraint in visual semantic categorization , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[25]  S. Lupker,et al.  Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[26]  M. Snowling,et al.  The development of grapheme-phoneme correspondence in normal and dyslexic readers. , 1980, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[27]  U. Goswami,et al.  Phonological Skills and Learning to Read , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[28]  M. Bruck Word Recognition and Component Phonological Processing Skills of Adults with Childhood Diagnosis of Dyslexia , 1993 .

[29]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Word superiority, pseudoword superiority, and learning to read: A comparison of dyslexic and normal readers , 2003, Brain and Language.

[30]  K. Forster,et al.  Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[31]  D. Howard,et al.  Developmental Phonological Dyslexia: Real Word Reading Can Be Completely Normal , 1996 .

[32]  J. Grainger,et al.  Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters , 2004 .

[33]  G. Stone,et al.  Strategic control of processing in word recognition. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  C. Whitney How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  R. L. Majeres Phonological and Orthographic Coding Skills in Adult Readers , 2005, The Journal of general psychology.

[36]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Varieties of developmental dyslexia , 1993, Cognition.

[37]  K. Forster,et al.  Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? , 1987 .

[38]  D. Compton The Relationships Among Phonological Processing, Orthographic Processing, and Lexical Development in Children with Reading Disabilities , 2002 .

[39]  J. Rack,et al.  Orthographic and phonetic coding in developmental dyslexia. , 1985, British journal of psychology.

[40]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition , 1971 .

[41]  J C Ziegler,et al.  Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision: still a challenge for current word recognition models. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  D W Massaro,et al.  Visual, orthographic, phonological, and lexical influences in reading. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  R. Frost Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails. , 1998 .

[44]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  Evidence for the use of assembled phonology in accessing the meaning of printed words. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Patterns of word and nonword processing in skilled and less-skilled readers , 1999 .

[46]  S. M. Chambers Letter and order information in lexical access , 1979 .

[47]  S. Andrews Lexical Retrieval and Selection Processes: Effects of Transposed-Letter Confusability , 1996 .

[48]  Chris Westbury,et al.  The Probability of the Least Likely Non-Length-Controlled Bigram Affects Lexical Decision Reaction Times , 2002, Brain and Language.

[49]  R. Campbell,et al.  Phonological Dyslexia and Dysgraphia in a Highly Literate Subject: A Developmental Case with Associated Deficits of Phonemic Processing and Awareness , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[50]  Uta Frith,et al.  Phonological difficulties in high-functioning dyslexics , 1996 .

[51]  Ron Borowsky,et al.  Diagnostics of phonological lexical processing: Pseudohomophone naming advantages, disadvantages, and base-word frequency effects , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[52]  M. Snowling,et al.  Cognitive assessment of dyslexic students in higher education. , 2002, The British journal of educational psychology.

[53]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.

[54]  L. Siegel,et al.  Evidence for Superior Orthographic Skills in Dyslexics , 1995 .

[55]  Colin J. Davis,et al.  The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. , 2001 .