Studentized Dynamical System for Robust Object Tracking

This paper describes a studentized dynamical system (SDS) for robust target tracking using a subspace representation. Dynamical systems (DS) provide a powerful framework for the probabilistic modeling of temporal sequences. Visual tracking problems are often cast as a sequential inference problem within the DS framework and a compact way to model the observation distributions (i.e., object appearances) is through probabilistic principal component analysis (PPCA). PPCA is a classic Gaussian based subspace representation method and a popular tool for appearance modeling. Although Gaussian density has theoretically nice properties, resulting in models that are always tractable, they are also severely limited in practical settings. One of the central issues in the use of PPCA for target appearance modeling is that it is very sensitive to outliers. The Gaussian density has a very light tail, while real world data with outliers exhibit heavy tails. Recently, more heavy-tailed distributions (e.g., Student's t-distribution) have been introduced to increase the robustness of the original PPCA. We propose to augment the traditional target tracking DS by adding a set of auxiliary latent variables to adjust the shape of the observation distribution. We show that by carefully choosing the probability density of these auxiliary latent variables, a more robust observation distribution can be obtained with tails heavier than Gaussian. Numerical experiments verify that the proposed SDS has a better capability to handle considerable amount of outlier noise and an improved tracking performance over DS with a Gaussian based observation model.

[1]  BlakeAndrew,et al.  C ONDENSATION Conditional Density Propagation forVisual Tracking , 1998 .

[2]  B. Ripley,et al.  Robust Statistics , 2018, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[3]  Chuanhai Liu ML Estimation of the MultivariatetDistribution and the EM Algorithm , 1997 .

[4]  Steve R. Waterhouse,et al.  Bayesian Methods for Mixtures of Experts , 1995, NIPS.

[5]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  JPDAF based HMM for real-time contour tracking , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[6]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Robust Bayesian Mixture Modelling , 2005, ESANN.

[7]  D. Ruppert Robust Statistics: The Approach Based on Influence Functions , 1987 .

[8]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[9]  A. Zellner Bayesian and Non-Bayesian Analysis of the Regression Model with Multivariate Student- t Error Terms , 1976 .

[10]  David Mackay,et al.  Probable networks and plausible predictions - a review of practical Bayesian methods for supervised neural networks , 1995 .

[11]  Michel Verleysen,et al.  Robust Bayesian clustering , 2007, Neural Networks.

[12]  Charles M. Bishop Variational principal components , 1999 .

[13]  Andrew Blake,et al.  Probabilistic Tracking with Exemplars in a Metric Space , 2002, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[14]  Neil D. Lawrence,et al.  Variational inference for Student-t models: Robust Bayesian interpolation and generalised component analysis , 2005, Neurocomputing.

[15]  Michael J. Black,et al.  EigenTracking: Robust Matching and Tracking of Articulated Objects Using a View-Based Representation , 1996, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[16]  Yong Li,et al.  Robust Bayesian PCA with Student’s t-distribution: The variational inference approach , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[17]  Ming-Hsuan Yang,et al.  Incremental Learning for Visual Tracking , 2004, NIPS.

[18]  Frank Dellaert,et al.  A Rao-Blackwellized particle filter for EigenTracking , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004..

[19]  Chuanhai Liu,et al.  ML Estimation of the Multivariate t Distribution and the EM Algorithm , 1997 .

[20]  David J. Fleet,et al.  Robust online appearance models for visual tracking , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[21]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to statistical pattern recognition (2nd ed.) , 1990 .

[22]  David J. Fleet,et al.  Robust Online Appearance Models for Visual Tracking , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[23]  Yong Li,et al.  Coupled Hidden Markov Models for Robust EO/IR Target Tracking , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[24]  Pavel Pudil,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 2006 .

[25]  Michael E. Tipping,et al.  A Variational Approach to Robust Regression , 2001, ICANN.

[26]  Michael E. Tipping,et al.  Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis , 1999 .

[27]  Sam T. Roweis,et al.  EM Algorithms for PCA and SPCA , 1997, NIPS.

[28]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Comparison of Approximate Methods for Handling Hyperparameters , 1999, Neural Computation.

[29]  Frank Dellaert,et al.  Robust Generative Subspace Modeling: The Subspace t Distribution , 2004 .

[30]  J. Hardin,et al.  Generalized Linear Models and Extensions , 2001 .

[31]  Guangyu Wang,et al.  Breakdown points of t-type regression estimators , 2000 .

[32]  Ming-Hsuan Yang,et al.  Incremental Learning for Robust Visual Tracking , 2008, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[33]  Yong Li,et al.  An EM algorithm for robust Bayesian PCA with student’s t-distribution , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[34]  Michel Verleysen,et al.  Robust probabilistic projections , 2006, ICML.

[35]  Frank Dellaert,et al.  MCMC-based particle filtering for tracking a variable number of interacting targets , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[36]  Michael Isard,et al.  CONDENSATION—Conditional Density Propagation for Visual Tracking , 1998, International Journal of Computer Vision.