An External Orientation to the Study of Causal Beliefs

Characteristic differences between Chinese and Western cultures are argued to have meaningful implications for attributional belief research and its extension into new cultural settings. This study examined attributional beliefs within and across samples from Taiwan and the United States. To meet unique demands inherent in Chinese culture, an externally oriented perspective was introduced. Accordingly, a new instrument for the assessment of attributional beliefs was developed and demonstrated as providing reliable dimension measurement. Results indicated that although the internal structure of the attributional belief construct appeared valid across the samples, the patterns of dimension relations within each sample were unique. Furthermore, internal and external locus dimensions, assessed separately, appeared to represent distinct concepts and show differential association with adjustment variables. Findings were interpreted based on sociocultural differences between the samples.

[1]  L. A. Pervin.  Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research , 1992 .

[2]  C. Steele.  The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self , 1988 .

[3]  Craig A. Anderson,et al.  The Causal Structure of Situations: The Generation of Plausible Causal Attributions as a Function of Type of Event Situation , 1983 .

[4]  H. Triandis.  Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. , 1989, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[5]  D. T. Mizokawa,et al.  Attributions of Academic Success and Failure , 1990 .

[6]  J. Mitchell.  Personality correlates of attributional style. , 1989, The Journal of psychology.

[7]  R. Larsen,et al.  The Satisfaction with Life Scale , 1985, Journal of personality assessment.

[8]  E. L. Gaier,et al.  Causal Attributions for College Success and Failure , 1994 .

[9]  K. Hwang.  Face and Favor: The Chinese Power Game , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  Kuo-shu Yang,et al.  The nature of achievement motivation in collectivist societies. , 1994 .

[11]  D. Ho.  Chinese patterns of socialization: A critical review. , 1986 .

[12]  G. Ichheiser.  MISINTERPRETATIONS OF PERSONALITY IN EVERYDAY LIFE AND THE PSYCHOLOGIST'S FRAME OF REFERENCE , 1943 .

[13]  B. Weiner.  Achievement Motivation and Attribution Theory , 1974 .

[14]  J. Harvey,et al.  New Directions in Attribution Research , 2018 .

[15]  C. Hui.  Measurement of individualism-collectivism , 1988 .

[16]  U. Renker.  [Motivation for work]. , 1975, Zeitschrift fur die gesamte Hygiene und ihre Grenzgebiete.

[17]  B. Weiner,et al.  Some Methodological Pitfalls in Attributional Research. , 1983 .

[18]  K. Crittenden,et al.  Self-Effacement and Social Responsibility , 1994 .

[19]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[20]  C. Carver,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES How Should Multifaceted Personality Constructs Be Tested ? Issues Illustrated by Self-Monitoring , Attributional Style , and Hardiness , 2004 .

[21]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. , 1996 .

[22]  Craig A. Anderson,et al.  A Controllability Attributional Model of Problems in Living: Dimensional and Situational Interactions in the Prediction of Depression and Loneliness , 1991 .

[23]  K. Crittenden.  Asian Self-Effacement or Feminine Modesty? , 1991 .

[24]  Michael Harris Bond,et al.  The Psychology of the Chinese people , 1986 .

[25]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  Individualism versus collectivism or versus authoritarianism , 1996 .

[26]  C Peterson,et al.  Causal explanations as a risk factor for depression: theory and evidence. , 1984, Psychological review.

[27]  C J Robins,et al.  Attributions and depression: why is the literature so inconsistent? , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  G. W. Bradley.  Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. , 1978 .

[29]  P. Sweeney,et al.  Attributional style in depression: a meta-analytic review. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  H. Triandis.  The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts , 1989 .

[31]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[32]  B. Weiner,et al.  A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. , 1979, Journal of educational psychology.

[33]  L. Abramson.  Social cognition and clinical psychology: A synthesis. , 1988 .

[34]  Michael Harris Bond,et al.  The handbook of Chinese psychology. , 1996 .

[35]  Michael Harris Bond,et al.  On the Empirical Identification of Dimensions for Cross-Cultural Comparisons , 1989 .

[36]  J. Berry,et al.  Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research , 1986 .

[37]  W. Zung.  A SELF-RATING DEPRESSION SCALE. , 1965, Archives of general psychiatry.

[38]  K. Crittenden.  Presidential Address on CAUSAL ATTRIBUTION IN SOCIOCULTURAL CONTEXT , 1989 .

[39]  Kuo-shu Yang.  The psychological transformation of the Chinese people as a result of societal modernization. , 1996 .

[40]  G. Metalsky,et al.  The hopelessness theory of depression: Does the research test the theory? , 1988 .

[41]  Gangyan Si,et al.  Causal Attribution Perception in Sports Achievement , 1995 .

[42]  C. Peterson,et al.  An Expanded Attributional Style Questionnaire. , 1988, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[43]  L H Chiu.  Locus of control differences between American and Chinese adolescents. , 1988, The Journal of social psychology.

[44]  Edward McAuley,et al.  Causal attributions, causal dimensions, and affective reactions to success and failure , 1986 .

[45]  M. Bond,et al.  Exploring implicit personality theories with indigenous or imported constructs: the Chinese case. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  B. Weiner.  An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. , 1985, Psychological review.

[47]  P. Tetlock.  Explaining Teacher Explanations of Pupil Performance; A Self-Presentation Interpretation. , 1980 .

[48]  D. Russell.  The Causal Dimension Scale: A measure of how individuals perceive causes. , 1982 .

[49]  R. Brislin.  The wording and translation of research instruments. , 1986 .

[50]  Craig A. Anderson,et al.  Validity and utility of the attributional style construct at a moderate level of specificity. , 1988 .

[51]  L. Abramson,et al.  Depressive attributional style. , 1979, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[52]  Tsung-Yi Lin,et al.  Chinese societies and mental health , 1995 .

[53]  Martin E. P. Seligman,et al.  Are Americans more Optimistic than the Chinese? , 1997 .

[54]  E. Diener,et al.  Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale , 1993 .

[55]  William K. Gabrenya,et al.  Chinese social interaction: Harmony and hierarchy on the good earth. , 1996 .

[56]  M. Gelfand,et al.  Horizontal and Vertical Dimensions of Individualism and Collectivism: A Theoretical and Measurement Refinement , 1995 .

[57]  A. Yu.  Ultimate life concerns, self, and Chinese achievement motivation. , 1996 .