Measuring multiple spike train synchrony

Measures of multiple spike train synchrony are essential in order to study issues such as spike timing reliability, network synchronization, and neuronal coding. These measures can broadly be divided in multivariate measures and averages over bivariate measures. One of the most recent bivariate approaches, the ISI-distance, employs the ratio of instantaneous interspike intervals (ISIs). In this study we propose two extensions of the ISI-distance, the straightforward averaged bivariate ISI-distance and the multivariate ISI-diversity based on the coefficient of variation. Like the original measure these extensions combine many properties desirable in applications to real data. In particular, they are parameter-free, time scale independent, and easy to visualize in a time-resolved manner, as we illustrate with in vitro recordings from a cortical neuron. Using a simulated network of Hindemarsh-Rose neurons as a controlled configuration we compare the performance of our methods in distinguishing different levels of multi-neuron spike train synchrony to the performance of six other previously published measures. We show and explain why the averaged bivariate measures perform better than the multivariate ones and why the multivariate ISI-diversity is the best performer among the multivariate methods. Finally, in a comparison against standard methods that rely on moving window estimates, we use single-unit monkey data to demonstrate the advantages of the instantaneous nature of our methods.

[1]  Jude F. Mitchell,et al.  Differential Attention-Dependent Response Modulation across Cell Classes in Macaque Visual Area V4 , 2007, Neuron.

[2]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spike-triggered neural characterization. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[3]  M. Kendall,et al.  Classical inference and the linear model , 1999 .

[4]  George L. Gerstein,et al.  Neural assemblies: technical issues, analysis, and modeling , 2001, Neural Networks.

[5]  Daniel Chicharro,et al.  Measuring spike train synchrony between neuronal populations , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[6]  A. W. Kemp,et al.  Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics. , 1994 .

[7]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Reliability of spike timing in neocortical neurons. , 1995, Science.

[8]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  Elimination of response latency variability in neuronal spike trains , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  Conor J. Houghton,et al.  A New Multineuron Spike Train Metric , 2008, Neural Computation.

[10]  Klaus Lehnertz,et al.  Measuring synchronization in coupled model systems: A comparison of different approaches , 2007 .

[11]  J. White,et al.  Frequency selectivity of layer II stellate cells in the medial entorhinal cortex. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Antonio Politi,et al.  Measuring spike train synchrony , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  Mark C. W. van Rossum,et al.  A Novel Spike Distance , 2001, Neural Computation.

[14]  F. Mechler,et al.  Neural coding of spatial phase in V1 of the macaque monkey. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  J. D. Hunter,et al.  Resonance effect for neural spike time reliability. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Paul H. E. Tiesinga,et al.  A New Correlation-Based Measure of Spike Timing Reliability , 2002, Neurocomputing.

[17]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Regulation of spike timing in visual cortical circuits , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[18]  R Quian Quiroga,et al.  Event synchronization: a simple and fast method to measure synchronicity and time delay patterns. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  Fortunato Tito Arecchi,et al.  A Feature-Based Model of Semantic Memory: The Importance of Being Chaotic , 2005, BVAI.

[20]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks , 2004, Science.

[21]  R Krahe,et al.  Robustness and variability of neuronal coding by amplitude-sensitive afferents in the weakly electric fish eigenmannia. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  J. Hindmarsh,et al.  A model of neuronal bursting using three coupled first order differential equations , 1984, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[23]  Antonio Politi,et al.  Measuring spike train reliability , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[24]  V. Booth,et al.  Causal entropies—A measure for determining changes in the temporal organization of neural systems , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[25]  Jonathan D. Victor,et al.  Metric-space analysis of spike trains: theory, algorithms and application , 1998, q-bio/0309031.

[26]  W G Hopkins,et al.  Measures of Reliability in Sports Medicine and Science , 2000, Sports medicine.

[27]  R. Kass,et al.  Multiple neural spike train data analysis: state-of-the-art and future challenges , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  David J. Christini,et al.  Real-Time Linux Dynamic Clamp: A Fast and Flexible Way to Construct Virtual Ion Channels in Living Cells , 2001, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  M. Kendall,et al.  Kendall's advanced theory of statistics , 1995 .

[30]  J. Victor,et al.  Nature and precision of temporal coding in visual cortex: a metric-space analysis. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  P H E Tiesinga,et al.  Chaos-induced modulation of reliability boosts output firing rate in downstream cortical areas. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.