Methodology for Site Classification Estimation Using Strong Ground Motion Data from the Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake

The ground motions of the Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake ( Mw =7.6) were recorded at 420 strong-motion stations, including 69 near-fault sites. However, the site conditions of many stations are not available. Among 420 strong-motion stations, the site conditions are known for only 87 stations, which were classified into four groups (S1, S2, S3, and S4) by using borehole data and some surface geology. This paper presents a methodology to estimate the missing site condition information at strong-motion stations in Taiwan. The method is based on the shape of the 5% damped pseudo-acceleration spectrum of the horizontal ground motion component normalized with respect to average PGA, where the classification scheme is developed using the data from the 87 stations for which the site conditions are known. Possible effects of soil nonlinearity, and distance to the fault on the classification are investigated. The results obtained from the proposed methodology are well correlated with the available known site classification information data. The methodology is then applied to estimate the site condition for the other 333 stations without known site classification. Our results are compared to previous results obtained based on interpretation of geologic maps and geomorphologic data. We find that the two approaches agree in 71% of the cases. We also tested the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio technique to estimate the site classification of other 333 strong-motion stations. However, this technique resulted in lower accuracy than does the proposed technique based on the spectral shape of normalized response spectra.

[1]  Cwb CWB Free-Field Strong-Motion Data from the 921 Chi-Chi Earthquake , 1999 .

[2]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Stochastic finite-fault modeling of ground motions from the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. II. Widespread Nonlinear response at soil sites , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[3]  Jamison H. Steidl,et al.  Borehole Response Studies at the Garner Valley Downhole Array, Southern California , 2002 .

[4]  Raúl R. Castro,et al.  Some aspects of source characteristics of the 19 September 1985 Michoacan earthquake and ground motion amplification in and near Mexico City from strong motion data , 1988 .

[5]  S. Tsuboi,et al.  Verification of Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral-Ratio Technique for Estimation of Site Response Using Borehole Seismographs , 2001 .

[6]  Roger D. Borcherdt,et al.  Estimates of Site-Dependent Response Spectra for Design (Methodology and Justification) , 1994 .

[7]  Angelo D'Ambrisi,et al.  Nonlinear statistic and dynamic analysis of reinforced concrete subassemlages. Report No. UCB/EERC 92/08, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, U.S.A., 1992 , 1992 .

[8]  Y Nakamura,et al.  A METHOD FOR DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS ESTIMATION OF SUBSURFACE USING MICROTREMOR ON THE GROUND SURFACE , 1989 .

[9]  R. Borcherdt Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay , 1970 .

[10]  E. Field,et al.  Nonlinear ground-motion amplification by sediments during the 1994 Northridge earthquake , 1997, Nature.

[11]  Raj V. Siddharthan,et al.  On the characteristics of nonlinear soil response , 1993 .

[12]  I. M. Idriss,et al.  Influence of Soil Conditions on Ground Motions During Earthquakes , 1969 .

[13]  H. Bolton Seed,et al.  Site-dependent spectra for earthquake-resistant design , 1976, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[14]  Francisco J. Chávez-García,et al.  Are microtremors useful in site response evaluation , 1994 .

[15]  Walter J. Silva,et al.  Properties of Vertical Ground Motions , 2002 .

[16]  I. Beresnev,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF NON-LINEAR SITE AMPLIFICATION AT TWO DOWNHOLE STRONG GROUND MOTION ARRAYS IN TAIWAN , 1995 .

[17]  Kuo-Liang Wen,et al.  Nonlinear Soil Response a Reality? , 2022 .

[18]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Integrated Use of Seismograph and Strong-Motion Data to Determine Soil Amplification: Response of the Fraser River Delta to the Duvall and Georgia Strait Earthquakes , 2000 .

[19]  Kuo-Liang Wen,et al.  The accuracy of soil response estimates using soil-to-rock spectral ratios , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[20]  Yi-Ben Tsai,et al.  Site Classification of Taiwan Free-Field Strong-Motion Stations , 2004 .

[21]  Keiiti Aki,et al.  Simultaneous study of the source, path, and site effects on strong ground motion during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake: A preliminary result on pervasive nonlinear site effects , 1991 .

[22]  Kuo-Liang Wen,et al.  Non‐linear soil response in ground motions , 1994 .

[23]  Edward H. Field,et al.  A comparison and test of various site-response estimation techniques, including three that are not reference-site dependent , 1995 .