Corpus tools as an affordance to learning in professional legal education

Abstract Considerable research has now been undertaken into the development of different approaches to exploiting language corpora for pedagogic purposes in the context of ESP. The question of how language corpora might be utilized by students beyond the immediate language-teaching context is, however, one as yet seldom addressed in the literature. This study attempts to explore the relationship between student use of online corpus tools and academic and professional discourse practices in the context of a professional legal training course at The City University of Hong Kong. Students enrolled in this course were given instruction in how to consult an online concordancer as language support when completing their legal writing assignments. Drawing on narratives of student experience, and other informant data including detailed logs of searches and the outcomes of assessments of English language proficiency, the paper discusses the ways in which students make strategic use of the corpus tools provided to develop competence in writing for legal purposes. The paper concludes by appraising the potential of corpus-based methods as an affordance for studying the practice of Law, in particular as a means of enhancing the acquisition of professional expertise by novice lawyers.

[1]  Henry Widdowson,et al.  On the limitations of linguistics applied , 2000 .

[2]  Christopher N. Candlin,et al.  Concordancing and the Teaching of the Vocabulary of Academic English , 1998 .

[3]  Vijay Bhatia,et al.  Legal discourse: Opportunities and threats for corpus linguistics , 2004 .

[4]  Hyunsook Yoon,et al.  ESL student attitudes toward corpus use in L2 writing , 2004 .

[5]  Sabine Braun,et al.  From pedagogically relevant corpora to authentic language learning contents , 2005, ReCALL.

[6]  Tom Cobb,et al.  Can Learners Use Concordance Feedback for Writing Errors , 2004 .

[7]  Tom Cobb,et al.  Is There Any Measurable Learning from Hands-On Concordancing?. , 1997 .

[8]  S. Bax.  CALL—past, present and future , 2003 .

[9]  Mohsen Ghadessy,et al.  Small corpus studies and ELT : theory and practice , 2001 .

[10]  Claire Fiona Kennedy,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF INTERMEDIATE STUDENTS' APPROACHES TO CORPUS INVESTIGATION , 2001 .

[11]  John M. Swales,et al.  A corpus-based EAP course for NNS doctoral students: Moving from available specialized corpora to self-compiled corpora , 2006 .

[12]  Angela Chambers,et al.  Corpus consultation and advanced learners’ writing skills in French , 2004 .

[13]  Börje Holmberg,et al.  Distance education and languages : evolution and change , 2005 .

[14]  Angela Chambers.  INTEGRATING CORPUS CONSULTATION IN LANGUAGE STUDIES , 2005 .

[15]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[16]  U. Connor,et al.  Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics , 2004 .

[17]  Laura Gavioli,et al.  Exploring corpora for ESP learning , 2005 .

[18]  J. Milton,et al.  From Parrots to Puppet masters: fostering creative and authentic language use with online tools , 2005 .

[19]  Tim Johns,et al.  Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar: From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of Data-driven Learning , 1994 .

[20]  Anne Wichmann,et al.  Teaching and Language Corpora , 1997 .

[21]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices , 1999 .

[22]  John Milton,et al.  Feedback in Second Language Writing: Resource-rich Web-based feedback: Helping learners become independent writers , 2006 .

[23]  John Flowerdew,et al.  Concordancing as a tool in course design , 1993 .

[24]  Anthony McEnery,et al.  Rethinking Language Pedagogy from a Corpus Perspective: Papers from the Third International Conference on Teaching and Language Corpora , 2000 .

[25]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Feedback in Second Language Writing: Author index , 2006 .