A prediction model for treatment decisions in distal radial physeal injuries: A multicenter retrospective study

Background: There are no clearly defined guidelines for the management of distal radial physeal injuries. We aimed to identify the risk factors for patients with distal radial physeal trauma for the risk of deformity, physeal closure, and revision procedure and develop a predictive model. Methods: The retrospective study included patients less than 16 years old with displaced distal radial physeal injuries treated between 2011 and 2018 across five centers in the United Kingdom. Deformity was defined as a volar angulation of >11°, dorsal angulation of >15°, a radial inclination of <15° or >23°, or positive ulnar variance. Presence of a bony bar spanning the physis was considered physeal closure. Results: This study comprised of 479 patients. In that, 32 (6.6%) patients had a second procedure. Also, 49 (10.2%) patients had closure of physis, and 28 (6%) patients had deformity at the end of follow-up. The occurrence of deformity had a strong correlation with age (p = 0.04) and immobilization duration (p = 0.003). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that age >12.5 years (p = 0.006) and sagittal angulation of >21.7° (p = 0.002) had a higher odd of deformity. Immobilization for <4.5 weeks (p = 0.01) had a higher revision rate. The nomograms showed good calibration, with a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 75%. Interpretation: The nomograms provide accurate, pragmatic multivariate predictive models. Anatomical reduction is recommended in patients >12.5 years of age with >22° of dorsal angulation with cast immobilization for no less than 4.5 weeks. Any revision procedure should be performed within 11 days from the date of injury to reduce the risk of physeal damage.

[1]  S. Jens,et al.  Well-founded practice or personal preference: a comparison of established techniques for measuring ulnar variance in healthy children and adolescents , 2019, European Radiology.

[2]  C. Goldfarb,et al.  Radiologic Evaluation of the Distal Radius Indices in Early And Late Childhood. , 2018, The Iowa orthopaedic journal.

[3]  Amir R Rizkala,et al.  Outcomes of Nonoperative Treatment of Salter-Harris II Distal Radius Fractures , 2016, Hand.

[4]  Alexander Zlotnik,et al.  A General-purpose Nomogram Generator for Predictive Logistic Regression Models , 2015 .

[5]  J. Kasser,et al.  Rockwood and Wilkins' Fractures in Children , 2014 .

[6]  R. Jaarsma,et al.  Risk Factors for Redisplacement of Pediatric Distal Forearm and Distal Radius Fractures , 2012, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[7]  M. McQueen,et al.  What are the radiological predictors of functional outcome following fractures of the distal radius? , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  B. Snyder,et al.  Cast Immobilization Versus Percutaneous Pin Fixation of Displaced Distal Radius Fractures in Children: A Prospective, Randomized Study , 2005, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[9]  I. Helenius,et al.  Marked initial displacement predicts complications in physeal fractures of the distal radius: An analysis of fracture characteristics, primary treatment and complications in 109 patients , 2005, Acta orthopaedica.

[10]  M. S. Larsen,et al.  Remodeling of Salter-Harris Type II Epiphyseal Plate Injury of the Distal Radius , 2004, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[11]  E. Ippolito,et al.  Physeal fractures of the distal radius and ulna: long-term prognosis. , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[12]  L. Klenerman,et al.  Fractures of the Distal Radius and Ulna , 1995, Journal of hand surgery.

[13]  W. Linhart,et al.  [Forearm fractures in children]. , 1994, Unfallchirurgie.

[14]  E. Larsen,et al.  Remodeling of angulated distal forearm fractures in children. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  A. Crawford Pitfalls and complications of fractures of the distal radius and ulna in childhood. , 1988, Hand clinics.

[16]  J. Esterhai,et al.  Fracture of the distal radial epiphysis. Characteristics and surgical treatment of premature, post-traumatic epiphyseal closure. , 1984, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  C. McCullough,et al.  Malunited fractures of the forearm in children. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  C. A. Peterson,et al.  Analysis of the incidence of injuries to the epiphyseal growth plate. , 1972, The Journal of trauma.

[19]  L. Rogers,et al.  The radiography of epiphyseal injuries. , 1970, Radiology.

[20]  W. Robert Harris,et al.  Injuries Involving the Epiphyseal Plate , 1963 .

[21]  K. Sakakida,et al.  [Epiphysial separation in the long bones]. , 1962, Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai zasshi.

[22]  R. K. Gandhi,et al.  Spontaneous correction of deformity following fractures of the forearm in children , 1962, The British journal of surgery.