Human Resource Flow and Software Firm Performance: The Role of Direct vs. Indirect Competitors

Recent years have witnessed increasingly stiff competition for talents among software firms. The economic impact of obtaining workers from or losing workers to competing firms, however, has rarely been quantified. Built on the literature of human resource flow and firm competition, this study examines the impact of human resource flows from and to different types of competitors on company performance. In particular, we divide competitors into direct and indirect competitors according to their market and resource similarity. Using a large dataset on labour mobility derived from LinkedIn.com, we quantify the impact of employees who came from or joined direct and indirect competitors respectively. We find that employees from competitors bring great benefits to the recipient firms. Specifically, a 1 percent increase of the number of employees from direct (indirect) competitors that join the focal company in the previous year increases the company’s economic value added by 0.054 (0.074) percent in the current year. Our results also contribute to the existing literature on human resources and company strategy and provide practical implications to recruiters and policy makers in the software industry.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[2]  M. Hitt,et al.  Direct and Moderating Effects of Human Capital on Strategy and Performance in Professional Service Firms: A Resource-Based Perspective , 2001 .

[3]  Max Chen.  Competitor analysis and interfirm riva-lry: toward a theoretical integration , 1996 .

[4]  Neus Palomeras,et al.  Markets for Inventors: Learning-by-Hiring as a Driver of Mobility , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Spinoffs and the Mobility of U.S. Merchant Semiconductor Inventors , 2015, Manag. Sci..

[6]  Karin Hoisl.  Does mobility increase the productivity of inventors? , 2006 .

[7]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  Technical and Strategic Human Resource Management Effectiveness as Determinants of Firm Performance , 1997 .

[8]  April Franco,et al.  Who leaves, where to, and why worry? employee mobility, entrepreneurship and effects on source firm performance , 2012 .

[9]  M. Arellano,et al.  Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations , 1991 .

[10]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[11]  D. Budescu.  Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. , 1993 .

[12]  Ke-Wei Huang,et al.  Engineer/Scientist Careers: Patents, Online Profiles, and Misclassification Bias , 2014 .

[13]  David A. Griffith,et al.  An Examination of Exploration and Exploitation Capabilities: Implications for Product Innovation and Market Performance , 2007 .

[14]  Gerard Hoberg,et al.  Product Market Synergies and Competition in Mergers and Acquisitions: A Text-Based Analysis , 2008 .

[15]  I. Png,et al.  Trade Secrets Law and Mobility: Evidence from 'Inevitable Disclosure' , 2015 .

[16]  C. Lengnick-Hall,et al.  Strategic Human Resources Management: A Review of the Literature and a Proposed Typology , 1988 .

[17]  A. Pakes,et al.  The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry , 1992 .

[18]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending , 1996 .

[19]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based perspective , 1994 .

[20]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage , 2004 .

[21]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[22]  Mengqi Wang,et al.  Firm-Level Productivity Analysis for Software as a Service Companies , 2009, ICIS.

[23]  Steven D. Maurer,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring The Economic Effectiveness of Human Resource Activities , 1988 .

[24]  Stephan Kudyba,et al.  Research Report: Increasing Returns to Information Technology , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  C. Oliver.  SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: COMBINING INSTITUTIONAL AND RESOURCE- BASED VIEWS , 1997 .

[26]  Ronald J. Mann,et al.  Do Patents Facilitate Financing in the Software Industry? , 2005 .

[27]  Chung-ki Min,et al.  The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: a Firm Level Analysis , 1997 .

[28]  I. Png,et al.  Trade Secrets Law and Engineer / Scientist Mobility : Evidence from “ Inevitable Disclosure ” , 2013 .

[29]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..