Comparison of 1-year vs 2-year change in regional cartilage thickness in osteoarthritis results from 346 participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.
暂无分享,去创建一个
F Eckstein | W Wirth | M Hudelmaier | F. Eckstein | M. Nevitt | B. Wyman | F. Baribaud | M. Hudelmaier | S. Maschek | W. Wirth | R. Davies | A Gimona | B T Wyman | O. Benichou | M Nevitt | O Benichou | F Baribaud | S Maschek | S Larroque | R Y Davies | J H Lee | J. Lee | A. Gimona | S. Larroque
[1] M. Nevitt,et al. Longitudinal performance evaluation and validation of fixed-flexion radiography of the knee for detection of joint space loss. , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.
[2] S. van der Linden,et al. Deciding on progression of joint damage in paired films of individual patients: smallest detectable difference or change , 2004, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.
[3] F Eckstein,et al. Sensitivity to change of cartilage morphometry using coronal FLASH, sagittal DESS, and coronal MPR DESS protocols--comparative data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). , 2010, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.
[4] J. Raynauld,et al. Analysis of the precision and sensitivity to change of different approaches to assess cartilage loss by quantitative MRI in a longitudinal multicentre clinical trial in patients with knee osteoarthritis , 2008, Arthritis research & therapy.
[5] F. Cicuttini,et al. Knee cartilage loss in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis over 4.5 years , 2006, Arthritis research & therapy.
[6] F. Eckstein,et al. Imaging in osteoarthritis. , 2008, Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America.
[7] Felix Eckstein,et al. Accuracy and precision of quantitative assessment of cartilage morphology by magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.
[8] Felix Eckstein,et al. Impact of coil design on the contrast‐to‐noise ratio, precision, and consistency of quantitative cartilage morphometry at 3 Tesla: A pilot study for the osteoarthritis initiative , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[9] F. Eckstein,et al. Femorotibial Cartilage Morphology: Reproducibility of Different Metrics and Femoral Regions, and Sensitivity to Change in Disease , 2010, Cells Tissues Organs.
[10] Felix Eckstein,et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-based cartilage loss in painful contralateral knees with and without radiographic joint space narrowing: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. , 2009, Arthritis and rheumatism.
[11] Felix Eckstein,et al. Quantitative MRI of cartilage and bone: degenerative changes in osteoarthritis , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.
[12] F. Eckstein,et al. Relationship of compartment-specific structural knee status at baseline with change in cartilage morphology: a prospective observational study using data from the osteoarthritis initiative , 2009, Arthritis research & therapy.
[13] H C Charles,et al. Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial , 2008, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.
[14] F. Eckstein,et al. Presence, location, type and size of denuded areas of subchondral bone in the knee as a function of radiographic stage of OA - data from the OA initiative. , 2010, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.
[15] F Eckstein,et al. Regional analysis of femorotibial cartilage loss in a subsample from the Osteoarthritis Initiative progression subcohort. , 2009, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.
[16] F Eckstein,et al. Osteoarthritis may not be a one-way-road of cartilage loss--comparison of spatial patterns of cartilage change between osteoarthritic and healthy knees. , 2010, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.
[17] F. Eckstein,et al. One year change of knee cartilage morphology in the first release of participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative progression subcohort: association with sex, body mass index, symptoms and radiographic osteoarthritis status , 2008, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.
[18] D. Altman,et al. Statistics Notes: Some examples of regression towards the mean , 1994 .
[19] F. Eckstein,et al. Quantitative MR imaging of cartilage and trabecular bone in osteoarthritis. , 2009, Radiologic clinics of North America.
[20] Felix Eckstein,et al. Patterns of femorotibial cartilage loss in knees with neutral, varus, and valgus alignment. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.
[21] A. Nelson. Region of interest analysis: by selecting regions with denuded areas can we detect greater amounts of change? , 2010 .
[22] Johanne Martel-Pelletier,et al. Risk factors associated with the loss of cartilage volume on weight-bearing areas in knee osteoarthritis patients assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: a longitudinal study , 2007, Arthritis research & therapy.
[23] Felix Eckstein,et al. Does the use of ordered values of subregional change in cartilage thickness improve the detection of disease progression in longitudinal studies of osteoarthritis? , 2009, Arthritis and rheumatism.
[24] F. Eckstein,et al. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (OA): morphological assessment. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.
[25] Adrian G Barnett,et al. Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. , 2004, International journal of epidemiology.
[26] Erika Schneider,et al. The osteoarthritis initiative: report on the design rationale for the magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the knee. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.
[27] S Totterman,et al. Region of interest analysis: by selecting regions with denuded areas can we detect greater amounts of change? , 2010, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.
[28] F. Eckstein,et al. 387 ORDERED VALUES OF CARTILAGE LOSS IN KNEE SUBREGIONS MORE EFFICIENTLY DIFFERENTIATE PROGRESSION AT DIFFERENT RADIOGRAPHIC STAGES OF OA: DATA FROM THE OA INITIATIVE , 2009 .
[29] Johanne Martel-Pelletier,et al. Long term evaluation of disease progression through the quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis patients: correlation with clinical symptoms and radiographic changes , 2005, Arthritis research & therapy.
[30] R Burgkart,et al. Proposal for a nomenclature for magnetic resonance imaging based measures of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.
[31] T P Andriacchi,et al. Considerations in measuring cartilage thickness using MRI: factors influencing reproducibility and accuracy. , 2005, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.
[32] T. Schnitzer,et al. Change in regional cartilage morphology and joint space width in osteoarthritis participants versus healthy controls: a multicentre study using 3.0 Tesla MRI and Lyon–Schuss radiography , 2008, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.
[33] F Eckstein,et al. Two year longitudinal change and test-retest-precision of knee cartilage morphology in a pilot study for the osteoarthritis initiative. , 2007, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.
[34] S Totterman,et al. Change in cartilage morphometry: a sample of the progression cohort of the Osteoarthritis Initiative , 2008, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.
[35] J. Lynch,et al. Comparison of fixed-flexion positioning with fluoroscopic semi-flexed positioning for quantifying radiographic joint-space width in the knee: test-retest reproducibility , 2003, Skeletal Radiology.
[36] Johanne Martel-Pelletier,et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of knee osteoarthritis progression over two years and correlation with clinical symptoms and radiologic changes. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.
[37] Felix Eckstein,et al. Spatial patterns of cartilage loss in the medial femoral condyle in osteoarthritic knees: Data from the osteoarthritis initiative , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[38] Felix Eckstein,et al. A Technique for Regional Analysis of Femorotibial Cartilage Thickness Based on Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.