THE IMPACT OF INTERNET COMMUNICATIONS ON SOCIAL INTERACTION

ABSTRACT The Internet is clearly on the way to becoming an integral tool of business, communication, and popular culture in many parts of the world. Computer Mediated Communications has a wide range of supporters and detractors. Some individuals argue the Internet will revolutionize social interactions, where others argue that the Internet will lead to loss of privacy, impersonal communications and isolation. There are also those who argue that the Internet is also being presented as a pedagogical tool for changing how public education is delivered. We believe that the Internet is a neutral social structural tool with several positive possibilities. However, the Internet's extraordinary growth is not without concern. Of particular relevance is the issue of the potential impact of the Internet and computer-mediated communications on the nature and quality of social interaction, especially among young people. This article is an analysis of the possible consequences online communication might have on social interaction rituals. We focus on the current cyber-youth who have grown up with the Internet being a routine part of their everyday life and interaction rituals. A review of current research literature on online interaction and education use of the Internet reveals that in the United States a significant portion of youths are actively using the Internet as an important form of social interaction. This article explores what possible positive and negative outcomes may arise from cyber-youth using the Internet as a primary means of social interaction and how that might influence their development of their interaction ritual skills.

[1]  J. Sempsey The death of distance: How the communications revolution will change our lives , 1998 .

[2]  D. Hindman The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[3]  Oren Etzioni,et al.  Communities: Virtual vs. Real , 1997, Science.

[4]  Joseph Schmitz Structural relations, electronic media, and social change: the Public Electronic Network and the homeless , 1997 .

[5]  D. Tapscott Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation , 1984 .

[6]  Jennifer L. Gregg,et al.  Reformulating the Internet paradox: Social cognitive explanations of Internet use and depression. , 2001 .

[7]  D. Sunshine Hillygus,et al.  The impact of internet use of sociability: time-diary findings , 2002 .

[8]  Spencer E. Cahill Toward a Sociology of the Person* , 1998 .

[9]  Larry Cuban Teachers and machines : the classroom use of technology since 1920 , 1986 .

[10]  Louis Althusser,et al.  Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays , 1971 .

[11]  Patricia R. Webb Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community , 1996 .

[12]  B. Fredrickson What Good Are Positive Emotions? , 1998, Review of general psychology : journal of Division 1, of the American Psychological Association.

[13]  T. Postmes,et al.  Social Cues and Impression Formation in CMC , 2003 .

[14]  R. Spears,et al.  Social influence and the influence of the 'social' in computer-mediated communication. , 1992 .

[15]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[16]  W. Allen Martin,et al.  Being There Is What Matters , 1999 .

[17]  Wilson P. Dizard Meganet: How The Global Communications Network Will Connect Everyone On Earth , 1997 .

[18]  E. Goffman The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[19]  Pramod K. Nayar,et al.  The Internet in everyday life , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  G. Pronovost THE INTERNET AND TIME DISPLACEMENT: A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE , 2002 .

[21]  N. Nie,et al.  Internet and society: a preliminary report , 2001 .

[22]  James R. Layton,et al.  No Significant Difference Phenomenon , 1999, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[23]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Beyond Hearing : Where Real-World and Online Support Meet , 2002 .

[24]  Jamie P. Merisotis The "What's-the-Difference?" Debate , 1999 .

[25]  T. Scheff,et al.  Microsociology: Discourse, Emotion and Social Structure , 1993 .

[26]  Dennis Waskul,et al.  Cyberself: The Emergence of Self in Online Chat , 1997, Inf. Soc..

[27]  Noriko Hara,et al.  Students’ Distress with a Web-based Distance Education Course: An Ethnographic Study of Participants' Experiences , 2003 .

[28]  Steven E. Miller Civilizing cyberspace - policy, power and the information superhighway , 1995 .

[29]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Beyond hearing: Where the real-world and online support meet. , 2002 .

[30]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization. , 1992 .

[31]  Kheir Al-Kodmany GIS in the Urban Landscape: Reconfiguring neighbourhood planning and design processes , 2000 .

[32]  Jonathan Gershuny,et al.  MASS MEDIA, LEISURE AND HOME IT: A PANEL TIME-DIARY APPROACH , 2002 .

[33]  Edward Schwartz,et al.  NetActivism - how citizens use the internet , 1996 .

[34]  D. Schultz The Dialogue of Justice: Toward a Self-Reflective Society , 1995 .

[35]  E. Goffman Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behavior , 1967 .

[36]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[37]  David W. Moore POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS AND THE KNOWLEDGE-GAP HYPOTHESIS , 1987 .

[38]  Andrew Feenberg No Frills in the Virtual Classroom , 1999 .