Language Helps Children Succeed on a Classic Analogy Task

Adult humans show exceptional relational ability relative to other species. In this research, we trace the development of this ability in young children. We used a task widely used in comparative research-the relational match-to-sample task, which requires participants to notice and match the identity relation: for example, AA should match BB instead of CD. Despite the simplicity of this relation, children under 4 years of age failed to pass this test (Experiment 1), and their performance did not improve even with initial feedback (Experiment 2). In Experiments 3 and 4, we found that two kinds of symbolic-linguistic experience can facilitate relational reasoning in young children. Our findings suggest that children learn to become adept analogical thinkers, and that language fosters this learning in at least two distinct ways.

[1]  Barbara Landau,et al.  More Than Meets the Eye , 2008, Psychological science.

[2]  D. Gentner,et al.  Relational language and the development of relational mapping , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Maya Hickmann,et al.  Language, Space and Development , 2010 .

[4]  R. K. Thompson,et al.  Language-naive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) judge relations between relations in a conceptual matching-to-sample task. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[5]  D. Gentner,et al.  Similarity and the development of rules , 1998, Cognition.

[6]  D. Gentner,et al.  The analogical mind : perspectives from cognitive science , 2001 .

[7]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  Ellen M. Markman,et al.  Categorization and Naming in Children: Problems of Induction , 1989 .

[9]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Similar and Different: The Differentiation of Basic-Level Categories , 1997 .

[10]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  The effect of language on similarity: The use of relational labels improves young children’s performance in a mapping task , 1998 .

[11]  Roger K. R. Thompson,et al.  Categorical perception and conceptual judgments by nonhuman primates: the paleological monkey and the analogical ape , 2000, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  D. Gentner,et al.  Where Hypotheses Come From: Learning New Relations by Structural Alignment , 2010 .

[13]  D. Gentner,et al.  Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. , 1997 .

[14]  D. Gentner.  Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* , 1983 .

[15]  E A Wasserman,et al.  Entropy detection by pigeons: response to mixed visual displays after same-different discrimination training. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[16]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.

[17]  J. Call,et al.  Great apes’ capacities to recognize relational similarity , 2009, Cognition.

[18]  Joël Fagot,et al.  Generalized Relational Matching by Guinea Baboons (Papio papio) in Two-by-Two-Item Analogy Problems , 2011, Psychological science.

[19]  D. Gentner,et al.  Comparison in the Development of Categories , 1999 .

[20]  D. Premack,et al.  Infant chimpanzees spontaneously perceive both concrete and abstract same/different relations. , 1990, Child development.

[21]  D. Gentner,et al.  Making a silk purse out of two sow's ears: young children's use of comparison in category learning. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  L. Smith.  Young children's understanding of attributes and dimensions: a comparison of conceptual and linguistic measures. , 1984, Child development.

[23]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Mutual bootstrapping between language and analogical processing , 2010, Language and Cognition.

[24]  David A. Washburn,et al.  Monkeys trained with same/different symbols do not match relations: (536982012-161) , 1997 .

[25]  Derek C. Penn,et al.  Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[26]  L. Hermer-Vazquez,et al.  Language, space, and the development of cognitive flexibility in humans: the case of two spatial memory tasks , 2001, Cognition.

[27]  A. Wright,et al.  Mechanisms of same/different concept learning in primates and avians , 2006, Behavioural Processes.

[28]  Florencia K. Anggoro,et al.  Structure mapping and relational language support children's learning of relational categories. , 2011, Child development.

[29]  Timothy M. Flemming,et al.  Disconnect in concept learning by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): judgment of relations and relations-between-relations. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[30]  Lisa M. Oakes,et al.  Early Category and Concept Development: Making Sense of the Blooming, Buzzing Confusion , 2008 .

[31]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Why we’re so smart , 2003 .

[32]  D. Gentner,et al.  Language and the career of similarity. , 1991 .

[33]  David Premack,et al.  The codes of man and beasts , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[34]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Relational language supports relational cognition in humans and apes , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[35]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Spatial language facilitates spatial cognition: Evidence from children who lack language input , 2013, Cognition.

[36]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Bootstrapping the Mind: Analogical Processes and Symbol Systems , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[37]  S. Waxman.  Links between object categorization and naming: Origins and emergence in human infants , 2003 .