Intestinal Stem Cell Replacement Follows a Pattern of Neutral Drift

Gut Stem Cell Replacement Gut cell turnover is characteristically rapid and relies on stem cells in the crypts that lie between the intestinal villi. The prevailing view is that stem cell division is asymmetric with one daughter retaining a stem cell character; however, this pattern of stem cell turnover does not always apply. Using long-term lineage tracing, Lopez-Garcia et al. (p. 822, published online 23 September) showed that the loss of a stem cell was compensated for by the multiplication of a neighboring cell. The rate of stem-cell loss was found to be equivalent to the rate of cell division, indicating that symmetric cell division was the rule for gut stem cells and implying stochastic expansion, contraction, and extinction of clones occurs. Intestinal stem cells form an equipotent population where loss of a stem cell is compensated for by multiplication of a neighbor. With the capacity for rapid self-renewal and regeneration, the intestinal epithelium is stereotypical of stem cell–supported tissues. Yet the pattern of stem cell turnover remains in question. Applying analytical methods from population dynamics and statistical physics to an inducible genetic labeling system, we showed that clone size distributions conform to a distinctive scaling behavior at short times. This result demonstrates that intestinal stem cells form an equipotent population in which the loss of a stem cell is compensated by the multiplication of a neighbor, leading to neutral drift dynamics in which clones expand and contract at random until they either take over the crypt or they are lost. Combined with long-term clonal fate data, we show that the rate of stem cell replacement is comparable to the cell division rate, implying that neutral drift and symmetrical cell divisions are central to stem cell homeostasis.

[1]  U. Paulus,et al.  Clonality and life cycles of intestinal crypts explained by a state dependent stochastic model of epithelial stem cell organization. , 1997, Journal of Theoretical Biology.

[2]  C. Potten Cell cycles in cell hierarchies. , 1986, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[3]  Allon M. Klein,et al.  Mouse germ line stem cells undergo rapid and stochastic turnover. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[4]  D. Appleton,et al.  Cell population kinetics in the mouse jejunal crypt , 1975, Virchows Archiv. B, Cell pathology.

[5]  D. Appleton,et al.  Variation in the cell cycle time in the crypts of lieberkühn of the mouse , 1979, Virchows Archiv. B, Cell pathology including molecular pathology.

[6]  Hans Clevers,et al.  Spindle orientation bias in gut epithelial stem cell compartments is lost in precancerous tissue. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[7]  B. A. J. Ponder,et al.  A clonal marker induced by mutation in mouse intestinal epithelium , 1988, Nature.

[8]  H. Clevers,et al.  Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5 , 2007, Nature.

[9]  N. Wright,et al.  Crypt fission in the small intestine and colon. A mechanism for the emergence of G6PD locus-mutated crypts after treatment with mutagens. , 1995, The American journal of pathology.

[10]  F M Watt,et al.  Out of Eden: stem cells and their niches. , 2000, Science.

[11]  Christopher S Potten,et al.  Intestinal stem cells protect their genome by selective segregation of template DNA strands. , 2002, Journal of cell science.

[12]  R. Shivdasani,et al.  Stem cells: The intestinal–crypt casino , 2010, Nature.

[13]  G. Williams,et al.  Demonstration of somatic mutation and colonic crypt clonality by X-linked enzyme histochemistry , 1988, Nature.

[14]  Xi C. He,et al.  Current view: intestinal stem cells and signaling. , 2008, Gastroenterology.

[15]  C. Potten,et al.  Gut instincts: thoughts on intestinal epithelial stem cells. , 2000, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[16]  D. Winton,et al.  Stem-cell organization in mouse small intestine , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Sean J. Morrison,et al.  Asymmetric and symmetric stem-cell divisions in development and cancer , 2006, Nature.

[18]  Allon M Klein,et al.  Kinetics of cell division in epidermal maintenance. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  H. Clevers,et al.  Very long-term self-renewal of small intestine, colon, and hair follicles from cycling Lgr5+ve stem cells. , 2008, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[20]  M Bjerknes,et al.  Assessment of the symmetry of stem-cell mitoses. , 1985, Biophysical journal.

[21]  N. Wright,et al.  The kinetics of villus cell populations in the mouse small intestine , 1982, Cell and tissue kinetics.

[22]  G. Williams,et al.  A stem cell niche theory of intestinal crypt maintenance based on a study of somatic mutation in colonic mucosa. , 1992, The American journal of pathology.

[23]  M. Loeffler,et al.  Somatic mutation, monoclonality and stochastic models of stem cell organization in the intestinal crypt. , 1993, Journal of theoretical biology.