Habitat selection by the highly endangered long-horned beetle Rosalia alpina in Southern Europe: a multiple spatial scale assessment

Despite the popularity of the saproxylic cerambycid Rosalia alpina as a flagship species, its ecology is still poorly know, especially in the southern part of its range. Detailed information on its habitat preferences is needed to plan appropriate management. We set our multiple spatial scale assessment of habitat preferences in a beech forest of central Italy whose landscape, featuring both unmanaged forest and two types of grazed open forest, allowed us to look at the influence of different land uses. Preferred trees occurred in open sites, and those close to tall undergrowth were avoided. A range of moribund or dead trees were used: those preferred had a lower percentage canopy closure, significantly thicker bark, and were more sun-exposed, than the average. Logistic regression showed that the most important variables for selection were distance from nearest occupied tree, bark thickness, undergrowth height and irradiation. Occurrence likelihood augmented as the distance from nearest other occupied tree increased. Despite being mostly unmanaged, forest was avoided, whereas open forest (with trees pruned by ‘shredding’) was used more than expected. Although intensive forestry limits the availability of dead wood, closed forest may be unsuitable when shadowing useful substrate. The disappearance of traditional forms of forest management as shredding and moderate cattle grazing may lead to woody vegetation expansion and habitat closure eventually threatening the persistence of R. alpina. The return to traditional habitat management would be beneficial to R. alpina, an issue that conservation plans should carefully take it into account.

[1]  Bengt Gunnar Jonsson,et al.  Ecology of Species Living on Dead Wood - Lessons for Dead Wood Management , 2005 .

[2]  M. McGeoch The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicators , 2007 .

[3]  B. Nordén,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of silvicultural measures to increase substrate availability for red-listed wood-living organisms in Norway spruce forests , 2006 .

[4]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Threatened Plant, Animal, and Fungus Species in Swedish Forests: Distribution and Habitat Associations , 1994 .

[5]  Maja Jurc,et al.  FOREST AS A HABITAT OF SAPROXYLIC BEETLES ON NATURA 2000 SITES IN SLOVENIA , 2008 .

[6]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE , 2002, Ecology.

[7]  P. Duelli,et al.  Der Alpenbock (Rosalia alpina). Ein seltener Bockkäfer als Flaggschiff-Art , 2005 .

[8]  Gustaf Aulén,et al.  Ecology and distribution history of the white-backed woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos in Sweden : Den vitryggiga hackspettens Dendrocopos leucotos ekologi och utbredningshistoria i Sverige , 1988 .

[9]  L. Kaila,et al.  Dead trees left in clear-cuts benefit saproxylic Coleoptera adapted to natural disturbances in boreal forest , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[10]  S. Mazzoleni,et al.  Roost selection by barbastelle bats (Barbastella barbastellus, Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) in beech woodlands of central Italy: consequences for conservation , 2004 .

[11]  B. Groombridge Global biodiversity: status of the earth's living resources. , 1992 .

[12]  Å. Lindelöw,et al.  Saproxylic Beetles in Standing Dead Wood Density in Relation to Substrate Sun-exposure and Diameter , 2005, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[13]  B. Schröder,et al.  Modelling habitat and spatial distribution of an endangered longhorn beetle - A case study for saproxylic insect conservation , 2007 .

[14]  E. J. Milner-Gulland,et al.  Conservation and Sustainable Use , 2007 .

[15]  M. Konvička,et al.  Habitat preferences of oak-feeding xylophagous beetles in a temperate woodland: implications for forest history and management , 2009, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[16]  S. Stuart,et al.  Wildlife in a changing world : an analysis of the 2008 IUCN red list of threatened species , 2009 .

[17]  Y. Basset,et al.  Insect conservation: finding the way forward , 2008 .

[18]  J. Ragle,et al.  IUCN Red List of Threatened Species , 2010 .

[19]  Clyde W. Neu,et al.  A TECHNIQUE FOR ANALYSIS OF UTILIZATION- AVAILABILITY DATA' , 1974 .

[20]  E. J. Milner-Gulland,et al.  Conservation and Sustainable Use: A Handbook of Techniques , 2008 .

[21]  G. Mikusiński,et al.  The white-backed woodpecker: umbrella species for forest conservation planning? , 2008, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[22]  J. Millar,et al.  Male-Produced Aggregation Pheromone of the Cerambycid Beetle Rosalia funebris , 2009, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[23]  Martin C.D. Speight,et al.  Saproxylic Invertebrates and Their Conservation , 1989 .

[24]  T. Ranius,et al.  The influence of forest regrowth, original canopy cover and tree size on saproxylic beetles associated with old oaks. , 2000 .

[25]  T. New Are Lepidoptera an effective ‘umbrella group‘ for biodiversity conservation? , 1997, Journal of Insect Conservation.